BREAKING: Hardcore Husky to ban Donald Sterling for Life

DerekJohnson

Rumor has it he's been posting here under the handle "Ozone"

allpurpleallgold

The O stands for 'oven'.

Fenwick

he deserved to be banned - couldn't play ball for shit anyway.

OZONE

DerekJohnson said:

Rumor has it he's been posting here under the handle "Ozone"

Nah... Sterling is like you... big fan of reverse white guilt.

He got busted and banned.

You had to change the subtitle on your self published book.

hth

dnc

DerekJohnson said:

Rumor has it he's been posting here under the handle "Ozone"

That dude's a major quook man. MAJOR.

[Deleted User]

dnc said:

DerekJohnson said:

Rumor has it he's been posting here under the handle "Ozone"

That dude's a major quook man. MAJOR.

Quook version of IMALOSER for sure.

PurpleJ

He_Needs_More_Time said:

dnc said:

DerekJohnson said:

Rumor has it he's been posting here under the handle "Ozone"

That dude's a major quook man. MAJOR.

Quook version of IMALOSER for sure.

At least the loser was entertaining once in a while. This guy's got nothing.

AZDuck

Ozone had his moments where it seemed like he was starting to get this place dialed in... then... not so much. Is he (RIP) yet?

sarktastic

Fascism is fashionable these days

QuornDawg

allpurpleallgold said:

The O stands for 'oven'.

Ozone is Jewish?

MikeDamone

Sounds like you aren't familiar with the first amendment.

QuornDawg

MikeDamone said:

Sounds like you aren't familiar with the first amendment.

This is not a first amendment issue, it is a freedom of speech issue.

At least that's what I'm hearing

sarktastic

I'm all for freedom of speech... as long as it's been approved first.

OZONE

PurpleJ said:

He_Needs_More_Time said:

dnc said:

DerekJohnson said:

Rumor has it he's been posting here under the handle "Ozone"

That dude's a major quook man. MAJOR.

Quook version of IMALOSER for sure.

At least the loser was entertaining once in a while. This guy's got nothing.

I'm not here to entertain you. You've got your sweatpants drawstring and magnifying glass for that.

CFetters_Nacho_Lover

OZONE said:

PurpleJ said:

He_Needs_More_Time said:

dnc said:

DerekJohnson said:

Rumor has it he's been posting here under the handle "Ozone"

That dude's a major quook man. MAJOR.

Quook version of IMALOSER for sure.

At least the loser was entertaining once in a while. This guy's got nothing.

I'm not here to entertain you. You've got your sweatpants drawstring and magnifying glass for that.

And he's still not entertaining us.

DerekJohnson

OZONE said:

DerekJohnson said:

Rumor has it he's been posting here under the handle "Ozone"

Nah... Sterling is like you... big fan of reverse white guilt.

He got busted and banned.

You had to change the subtitle on your self published book.

hth

The subtitle never changed. HTH

DerekJohnson

What exactly is reverse white guilt anyway?

pawz

DerekJohnson said:

What exactly is reverse white guilt anyway?

Stockholm Syndrome.

DerekJohnson

pawz said:

DerekJohnson said:

What exactly is reverse white guilt anyway?

Stockholm Syndrome.

So that's what that means

pawz

DerekJohnson said:

pawz said:

DerekJohnson said:

What exactly is reverse white guilt anyway?

Stockholm Syndrome.

So that's what that means

Probably not. Sounded good for a second, though.

DerekJohnson

If Stockholm ever gets an NBA team, they should call it the Syndromes.

QuornDawg

Stockholm syndrome, or capture-bonding, is a psychological phenomenon in which hostages express empathy and sympathy and have positive feelings toward their captors, sometimes to the point of defending and identifying with them. These feelings are generally considered irrational in light of the danger or risk endured by the victims, who essentially mistake a lack of abuse from their captors for an act of kindness.[1][2] The FBI's Hostage Barricade Database System shows that roughly 8% of victims show evidence of Stockholm syndrome.[3]

Stockholm syndrome can be seen as a form of traumatic bonding, which does not necessarily require a hostage scenario, but which describes "strong emotional ties that develop between two persons where one person intermittently harasses, beats, threatens, abuses, or intimidates the other."[4] One commonly used hypothesis to explain the effect of Stockholm syndrome is based on Freudian theory. It suggests that the bonding is the individual's response to trauma in becoming a victim. Identifying with the aggressor is one way that the ego defends itself. When a victim believes the same values as the aggressor, they cease to be a threat.[5]

Battered-person syndrome is an example of activating the capture-bonding psychological mechanism, as are military basic training and fraternity bonding by hazing.[dubious – discuss].[6][7][8]

Stockholm syndrome is sometimes erroneously referred to as Helsinki syndrome.[9][10] Helsinki syndrome is more of a case of group think and inattentional blindness to the negative in order to achieve some perceived benefit, a reference to the non-binding Helsinki Accords that attempted to settle post WWII Cold War tensions.

Contents
1 History
2 Evolutionary explanations
3 In economics
4 Lima syndrome
5 Oslo syndrome
6 See also
7 Notes
8 References
9 External links
History[edit]


Kreditbanken at Norrmalmstorg, Stockholm, Sweden.
Stockholm syndrome is named after the Norrmalmstorg robbery of Kreditbanken at Norrmalmstorg in Stockholm, Sweden, in which several bank employees were held hostage in a bank vault from August 23 to 28, 1973, while their captors negotiated with police. During this standoff, the victims became emotionally attached to their captors, rejected assistance from government officials at one point, and even defended their captors after they were freed from their six-day ordeal.[11] The term was coined by the criminologist and psychiatrist Nils Bejerot as "Norrmalmstorgssyndromet" (Swedish) but it became known as "Stockholm Syndrome" abroad.[12] It was originally defined by psychiatrist Frank Ochberg to aid the management of hostage situations.[13]

Evolutionary explanations[edit]
In the view of evolutionary psychology, "the mind is a set of information-processing machines that were designed by natural selection to solve adaptive problems faced by our hunter-gatherer ancestors."[14]

One of the "adaptive problems faced by our hunter-gatherer ancestors", particularly females, was being abducted by another band. Life in the human "environment of evolutionary adaptiveness" (EEA) is thought by researchers such as Israeli military historian Azar Gat to be similar to that of the few remaining hunter-gatherer societies. "Deadly violence is also regularly activated in competition over women. . . . Abduction of women, rape, ... are widespread direct causes of reproductive conflict ..."[15] Being captured[16] and having their dependent children killed might have been fairly common.[17] Women who resisted capture in such situations risked being killed.[18]

Azar Gat argues that war and abductions (capture) were typical of human pre-history.[15] When selection is intense and persistent, adaptive traits (such as capture-bonding) become universal to the population or species.

Partial activation of the capture-bonding psychological trait may lie behind battered-wife syndrome, military basic training, fraternity hazing, and sex practices such as sadism/masochism or bondage/discipline.[6] Being captured by neighbouring tribes was a relatively common event for women in human history, if anything like the recent history of the few remaining primitive tribes. In some of those tribes (Yanomamo, for instance) practically everyone in the tribe is descended from a captive within the last three generations. Perhaps as high as one in ten of females were abducted and incorporated into the tribe that captured them.[6]

In economics[edit]
In June 2012, at the 9th International Conference on Developments in Economic Theory and Policy, in Bilbao, organised by the Department of Applied Economics of the Spanish University of the Basque Country and the British Cambridge Centre for Economic and Public Policy, Department of Land Economy of the University of Cambridge, the concept of Stockholm syndrome was introduced in economics referring to governments that have been "kidnapped" by financial capital because of their need to refinance public debt. They are coerced into accepting high interest rates and conditions that compromise their sovereignty.[citation needed][19][broken citation]

Lima syndrome[edit]
A converse of Stockholm syndrome called Lima syndrome has been proposed, in which abductors develop sympathy for their hostages. There's many reasons why Lima Syndrome can develop in abductors. Sometimes when there are multiple abductors, one or more of them will start to disagree with what they are doing and influence one another, or they just begin to feel bad and don't have the heart to continue hurting their innocent captives. [20] Lima Syndrome was named after an abduction at the Japanese Embassy in Lima, Peru, in 1996, when members of a militant movement took hostage hundreds of people attending a party at the official residence of Japan's ambassador. Within a few hours, the abductors had set free most of the hostages, including the most valuable ones, owing to having sympathy towards them.[21][22]

Oslo syndrome[edit]
A corollary of the Stockholm syndrome, was proposed by Kenneth Levin in his 2005 book The Oslo Syndrome: Delusions of a People Under Siege in which he argued that the syndrome can afflict an entire people.[23][24][25][26]

GrundleStiltzkin

monroecougdad said:

Stockholm syndrome, or capture-bonding, is a ...

BRB,JO

Fire_Marshall_Bill

Someone cut and pasted the Wiki definition!!! Quick, someone quote it and write "disagree!"

Hardy har har! Comedy fucking gold!!!!

GrundleStiltzkin

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

Someone cut and pasted the Wiki definition!!! Quick, someone quote it and write "disagree!"

Hardy har har! Comedy fucking gold!!!!

This thread is already passed that stage. Next up is translating the Wiki into a New Guinea highlands language. Or Armenian.

dnc

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

Someone cut and pasted the Wiki definition!!! Quick, someone quote it and write "disagree!"

Hardy har har! Comedy fucking gold!!!!

Disagree

MikeDamone

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

Someone cut and pasted the Wiki definition!!! Quick, someone quote it and write "disagree!"

Hardy har har! Comedy fucking gold!!!!

You forgot to translate it to a different language. Are you new?

Fire_Marshall_Bill

MikeDamone said:

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

Someone cut and pasted the Wiki definition!!! Quick, someone quote it and write "disagree!"

Hardy har har! Comedy fucking gold!!!!

You forgot to translate it to a different language. Are you new?

Fuck, you're right. Noone has done Hebrew or Japanese for a while. I call those.

OZONE

CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

OZONE said:

PurpleJ said:

He_Needs_More_Time said:

dnc said:

DerekJohnson said:

Rumor has it he's been posting here under the handle "Ozone"

That dude's a major quook man. MAJOR.

Quook version of IMALOSER for sure.

At least the loser was entertaining once in a while. This guy's got nothing.

I'm not here to entertain you. You've got your sweatpants drawstring and magnifying glass for that.

And he's still not entertaining us.

It takes a certain level of cerebral fortitude... that some of you lack.

OZONE

DerekJohnson said:

OZONE said:

DerekJohnson said:

Rumor has it he's been posting here under the handle "Ozone"

Nah... Sterling is like you... big fan of reverse white guilt.

He got busted and banned.

You had to change the subtitle on your self published book.

hth

The subtitle never changed. HTH

Pretty sure saw I saw somebody trying to hawk a copy that didn't have that subtitle on the cover. I could be wrong... mark your calendar.

OZONE

DerekJohnson said:

What exactly is reverse white guilt anyway?

I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt that this is a rhetorical question. If you really can't figure that out... then by god you certainly should not be writing on topics that include race.