Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Questioning the outcome of an election is okay...

2

Comments

  • SourcesSources Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 4,015 Founders Club

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Should have filed 63 lawsuits and had her followers storm the Capitol.

    No need to do that. She knew she already had the permanent bureaucracy, the MSM, the National Security state and useful idiots like you in her corner available to carry out all the dirty work she needed.





    So when is she going to be installed as President?
    I don't know, I've not made the claim that either Hillary or Trump will be installed as President. Fact still stands, she knew she had idiots like you who would swallow like bitches the Russian collusion fraud. She knew that she had the help of the Obama DOJ, FBI and CIA. And she knew that she had people like you in her corner who would happily lie their asses off for her, and turn a blind eye to her paying Russians for dirt in order to impact the 2016 election.




    Russia wanted Daddy to win and interfered in the election. That statement is factual and beyond serious debate.

    Did Daddy win because of Russia's interference? No way of knowing.

    I haven't moved.
    The statement isn't factual
    Your argument is with every serious person in either party.

    Now I realize that serves this populist "pox on both your houses" instinct you and the other gals gravitate to. But the politics of grievance isn't really a cohesive, lasting movement, and judging by one of your posts today, you yourself are ready to jettison the singular personality that allowed your cult hold together for a while.

    Good luck.
    Lot of words to just say you were talking out your ass Dazzler. And of course dodging the question you were asked like the lying Kunt you are was expected.
    Like PIPS's non-explanation about why Putin would prefer a pro-American pro-energy independent Trump versus an America hating PIPS who supports open borders and energy dependence. The next question is how did Putin "steal" the election?
    Gasbag is having a hard time seeing why the guy who threatened the NATO alliance and tried to remove sanctions on Russia as one of his very first acts was preferred by Putin.

    It's tuff!
    Threatened the NATO alliance. Classic.

    Tell us another whiteboard hoax lie, Dazzler. Along with the famous Russian state narrative.

    PT is a gal who never ever would have told the Emperor he had no clothes on.
    I'm hearing trump tried to start ww3

    But even if he didn't he left the situation for it



    When does Biden become culpable for shit.

    And honestly I don't care about Ukraine.


    Unless we must import Ukrainian women along with venezuelan women. Maybe this is our moral prerogative
    White guilt essentially requires it
  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,086
    edited April 2022
    Sources said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Should have filed 63 lawsuits and had her followers storm the Capitol.

    No need to do that. She knew she already had the permanent bureaucracy, the MSM, the National Security state and useful idiots like you in her corner available to carry out all the dirty work she needed.





    So when is she going to be installed as President?
    I don't know, I've not made the claim that either Hillary or Trump will be installed as President. Fact still stands, she knew she had idiots like you who would swallow like bitches the Russian collusion fraud. She knew that she had the help of the Obama DOJ, FBI and CIA. And she knew that she had people like you in her corner who would happily lie their asses off for her, and turn a blind eye to her paying Russians for dirt in order to impact the 2016 election.




    Russia wanted Daddy to win and interfered in the election. That statement is factual and beyond serious debate.

    Did Daddy win because of Russia's interference? No way of knowing.

    I haven't moved.
    The statement isn't factual
    Your argument is with every serious person in either party.

    Now I realize that serves this populist "pox on both your houses" instinct you and the other gals gravitate to. But the politics of grievance isn't really a cohesive, lasting movement, and judging by one of your posts today, you yourself are ready to jettison the singular personality that allowed your cult hold together for a while.

    Good luck.
    Lot of words to just say you were talking out your ass Dazzler. And of course dodging the question you were asked like the lying Kunt you are was expected.
    Like PIPS's non-explanation about why Putin would prefer a pro-American pro-energy independent Trump versus an America hating PIPS who supports open borders and energy dependence. The next question is how did Putin "steal" the election?
    Gasbag is having a hard time seeing why the guy who threatened the NATO alliance and tried to remove sanctions on Russia as one of his very first acts was preferred by Putin.

    It's tuff!
    Threatened the NATO alliance. Classic.

    Tell us another whiteboard hoax lie, Dazzler. Along with the famous Russian state narrative.

    PT is a gal who never ever would have told the Emperor he had no clothes on.
    I'm hearing trump tried to start ww3

    But even if he didn't he left the situation for it



    When does Biden become culpable for shit.

    And honestly I don't care about Ukraine.


    Unless we must import Ukrainian women along with venezuelan women. Maybe this is our moral prerogative
    White guilt essentially requires it
    I agree. I hereby announce my guilt.

    I did have a Nazi grandfather.
    Who got captured and put in a Russian work camp.

    So not only guilt but confusion.

    I wear the shame on my sleeve and agree to house one hot 21 year old Ukrainian as penance.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,628
    edited April 2022

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Should have filed 63 lawsuits and had her followers storm the Capitol.

    No need to do that. She knew she already had the permanent bureaucracy, the MSM, the National Security state and useful idiots like you in her corner available to carry out all the dirty work she needed.





    So when is she going to be installed as President?
    I don't know, I've not made the claim that either Hillary or Trump will be installed as President. Fact still stands, she knew she had idiots like you who would swallow like bitches the Russian collusion fraud. She knew that she had the help of the Obama DOJ, FBI and CIA. And she knew that she had people like you in her corner who would happily lie their asses off for her, and turn a blind eye to her paying Russians for dirt in order to impact the 2016 election.




    Russia wanted Daddy to win and interfered in the election. That statement is factual and beyond serious debate.

    Did Daddy win because of Russia's interference? No way of knowing.

    I haven't moved.
    The statement isn't factual
    Your argument is with every serious person in either party.

    Now I realize that serves this populist "pox on both your houses" instinct you and the other gals gravitate to. But the politics of grievance isn't really a cohesive, lasting movement, and judging by one of your posts today, you yourself are ready to jettison the singular personality that allowed your cult hold together for a while.

    Good luck.
    Lot of words to just say you were talking out your ass Dazzler. And of course dodging the question you were asked like the lying Kunt you are was expected.
    Like PIPS's non-explanation about why Putin would prefer a pro-American pro-energy independent Trump versus an America hating PIPS who supports open borders and energy dependence. The next question is how did Putin "steal" the election?
    Gasbag is having a hard time seeing why the guy who threatened the NATO alliance and tried to remove sanctions on Russia as one of his very first acts was preferred by Putin.

    It's tuff!
    Threatened the NATO alliance. Classic.

    Tell us another whiteboard hoax lie, Dazzler. Along with the famous Russian state narrative.

    PT is a gal who never ever would have told the Emperor he had no clothes on.
    I'm hearing trump tried to start ww3

    But even if he didn't he left the situation for it



    When does Biden become culpable for shit.

    And honestly I don't care about Ukraine.


    Unless we must import Ukrainian women along with venezuelan women. Maybe this is our moral prerogative
    The subject is whether the NATO alliance was threatened by Daddy's presidency.

    I'm happy to agree that Biden is very much to blame for NATO's resurgence.
  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,086
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Should have filed 63 lawsuits and had her followers storm the Capitol.

    No need to do that. She knew she already had the permanent bureaucracy, the MSM, the National Security state and useful idiots like you in her corner available to carry out all the dirty work she needed.





    So when is she going to be installed as President?
    I don't know, I've not made the claim that either Hillary or Trump will be installed as President. Fact still stands, she knew she had idiots like you who would swallow like bitches the Russian collusion fraud. She knew that she had the help of the Obama DOJ, FBI and CIA. And she knew that she had people like you in her corner who would happily lie their asses off for her, and turn a blind eye to her paying Russians for dirt in order to impact the 2016 election.




    Russia wanted Daddy to win and interfered in the election. That statement is factual and beyond serious debate.

    Did Daddy win because of Russia's interference? No way of knowing.

    I haven't moved.
    The statement isn't factual
    Your argument is with every serious person in either party.

    Now I realize that serves this populist "pox on both your houses" instinct you and the other gals gravitate to. But the politics of grievance isn't really a cohesive, lasting movement, and judging by one of your posts today, you yourself are ready to jettison the singular personality that allowed your cult hold together for a while.

    Good luck.
    Lot of words to just say you were talking out your ass Dazzler. And of course dodging the question you were asked like the lying Kunt you are was expected.
    Like PIPS's non-explanation about why Putin would prefer a pro-American pro-energy independent Trump versus an America hating PIPS who supports open borders and energy dependence. The next question is how did Putin "steal" the election?
    Gasbag is having a hard time seeing why the guy who threatened the NATO alliance and tried to remove sanctions on Russia as one of his very first acts was preferred by Putin.

    It's tuff!
    Threatened the NATO alliance. Classic.

    Tell us another whiteboard hoax lie, Dazzler. Along with the famous Russian state narrative.

    PT is a gal who never ever would have told the Emperor he had no clothes on.
    I'm hearing trump tried to start ww3

    But even if he didn't he left the situation for it



    When does Biden become culpable for shit.

    And honestly I don't care about Ukraine.


    Unless we must import Ukrainian women along with venezuelan women. Maybe this is our moral prerogative
    The subject is whether the NATO alliance was threatened by Daddy's presidency.

    I'm happy to agree that Biden is very much to blame for NATO's resurgence.
    I don't care about the subject. Will you admit your white guilt for me to have a 21 year old hot Ukrainian?

    Answer the question
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,628

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Should have filed 63 lawsuits and had her followers storm the Capitol.

    No need to do that. She knew she already had the permanent bureaucracy, the MSM, the National Security state and useful idiots like you in her corner available to carry out all the dirty work she needed.





    So when is she going to be installed as President?
    I don't know, I've not made the claim that either Hillary or Trump will be installed as President. Fact still stands, she knew she had idiots like you who would swallow like bitches the Russian collusion fraud. She knew that she had the help of the Obama DOJ, FBI and CIA. And she knew that she had people like you in her corner who would happily lie their asses off for her, and turn a blind eye to her paying Russians for dirt in order to impact the 2016 election.




    Russia wanted Daddy to win and interfered in the election. That statement is factual and beyond serious debate.

    Did Daddy win because of Russia's interference? No way of knowing.

    I haven't moved.
    The statement isn't factual
    Your argument is with every serious person in either party.

    Now I realize that serves this populist "pox on both your houses" instinct you and the other gals gravitate to. But the politics of grievance isn't really a cohesive, lasting movement, and judging by one of your posts today, you yourself are ready to jettison the singular personality that allowed your cult hold together for a while.

    Good luck.
    Lot of words to just say you were talking out your ass Dazzler. And of course dodging the question you were asked like the lying Kunt you are was expected.
    Like PIPS's non-explanation about why Putin would prefer a pro-American pro-energy independent Trump versus an America hating PIPS who supports open borders and energy dependence. The next question is how did Putin "steal" the election?
    Gasbag is having a hard time seeing why the guy who threatened the NATO alliance and tried to remove sanctions on Russia as one of his very first acts was preferred by Putin.

    It's tuff!
    Threatened the NATO alliance. Classic.

    Tell us another whiteboard hoax lie, Dazzler. Along with the famous Russian state narrative.

    PT is a gal who never ever would have told the Emperor he had no clothes on.
    I'm hearing trump tried to start ww3

    But even if he didn't he left the situation for it



    When does Biden become culpable for shit.

    And honestly I don't care about Ukraine.


    Unless we must import Ukrainian women along with venezuelan women. Maybe this is our moral prerogative
    The subject is whether the NATO alliance was threatened by Daddy's presidency.

    I'm happy to agree that Biden is very much to blame for NATO's resurgence.
    I don't care about the subject. Will you admit your white guilt for me to have a 21 year old hot Ukrainian?

    Answer the question
    Yes, but only if he has a hot sister for me.
  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,086
    edited April 2022
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Should have filed 63 lawsuits and had her followers storm the Capitol.

    No need to do that. She knew she already had the permanent bureaucracy, the MSM, the National Security state and useful idiots like you in her corner available to carry out all the dirty work she needed.





    So when is she going to be installed as President?
    I don't know, I've not made the claim that either Hillary or Trump will be installed as President. Fact still stands, she knew she had idiots like you who would swallow like bitches the Russian collusion fraud. She knew that she had the help of the Obama DOJ, FBI and CIA. And she knew that she had people like you in her corner who would happily lie their asses off for her, and turn a blind eye to her paying Russians for dirt in order to impact the 2016 election.




    Russia wanted Daddy to win and interfered in the election. That statement is factual and beyond serious debate.

    Did Daddy win because of Russia's interference? No way of knowing.

    I haven't moved.
    The statement isn't factual
    Your argument is with every serious person in either party.

    Now I realize that serves this populist "pox on both your houses" instinct you and the other gals gravitate to. But the politics of grievance isn't really a cohesive, lasting movement, and judging by one of your posts today, you yourself are ready to jettison the singular personality that allowed your cult hold together for a while.

    Good luck.
    Lot of words to just say you were talking out your ass Dazzler. And of course dodging the question you were asked like the lying Kunt you are was expected.
    Like PIPS's non-explanation about why Putin would prefer a pro-American pro-energy independent Trump versus an America hating PIPS who supports open borders and energy dependence. The next question is how did Putin "steal" the election?
    Gasbag is having a hard time seeing why the guy who threatened the NATO alliance and tried to remove sanctions on Russia as one of his very first acts was preferred by Putin.

    It's tuff!
    Threatened the NATO alliance. Classic.

    Tell us another whiteboard hoax lie, Dazzler. Along with the famous Russian state narrative.

    PT is a gal who never ever would have told the Emperor he had no clothes on.
    I'm hearing trump tried to start ww3

    But even if he didn't he left the situation for it



    When does Biden become culpable for shit.

    And honestly I don't care about Ukraine.


    Unless we must import Ukrainian women along with venezuelan women. Maybe this is our moral prerogative
    The subject is whether the NATO alliance was threatened by Daddy's presidency.

    I'm happy to agree that Biden is very much to blame for NATO's resurgence.
    I don't care about the subject. Will you admit your white guilt for me to have a 21 year old hot Ukrainian?

    Answer the question
    Yes, but only if he has a hot sister for me.
    You get the venezuelan.

    Nominally.

    As long as I have visiting rights

    I take it back. I get both. But one has to live like a mile away
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,737 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Should have filed 63 lawsuits and had her followers storm the Capitol.

    No need to do that. She knew she already had the permanent bureaucracy, the MSM, the National Security state and useful idiots like you in her corner available to carry out all the dirty work she needed.





    So when is she going to be installed as President?
    I don't know, I've not made the claim that either Hillary or Trump will be installed as President. Fact still stands, she knew she had idiots like you who would swallow like bitches the Russian collusion fraud. She knew that she had the help of the Obama DOJ, FBI and CIA. And she knew that she had people like you in her corner who would happily lie their asses off for her, and turn a blind eye to her paying Russians for dirt in order to impact the 2016 election.




    Russia wanted Daddy to win and interfered in the election. That statement is factual and beyond serious debate.

    Did Daddy win because of Russia's interference? No way of knowing.

    I haven't moved.
    The statement isn't factual
    Your argument is with every serious person in either party.

    Now I realize that serves this populist "pox on both your houses" instinct you and the other gals gravitate to. But the politics of grievance isn't really a cohesive, lasting movement, and judging by one of your posts today, you yourself are ready to jettison the singular personality that allowed your cult hold together for a while.

    Good luck.
    Lot of words to just say you were talking out your ass Dazzler. And of course dodging the question you were asked like the lying Kunt you are was expected.
    Like PIPS's non-explanation about why Putin would prefer a pro-American pro-energy independent Trump versus an America hating PIPS who supports open borders and energy dependence. The next question is how did Putin "steal" the election?
    Gasbag is having a hard time seeing why the guy who threatened the NATO alliance and tried to remove sanctions on Russia as one of his very first acts was preferred by Putin.

    It's tuff!
    Threatened the NATO alliance. Classic.

    Tell us another whiteboard hoax lie, Dazzler. Along with the famous Russian state narrative.

    PT is a gal who never ever would have told the Emperor he had no clothes on.
    I'm hearing trump tried to start ww3

    But even if he didn't he left the situation for it



    When does Biden become culpable for shit.

    And honestly I don't care about Ukraine.


    Unless we must import Ukrainian women along with venezuelan women. Maybe this is our moral prerogative
    The subject is whether the NATO alliance was threatened by Daddy's presidency.

    I'm happy to agree that Biden is very much to blame for NATO's resurgence.
    NATO is worthless to the Ukraine

    Your daddy didn't do shit
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,113

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Should have filed 63 lawsuits and had her followers storm the Capitol.

    No need to do that. She knew she already had the permanent bureaucracy, the MSM, the National Security state and useful idiots like you in her corner available to carry out all the dirty work she needed.





    So when is she going to be installed as President?
    I don't know, I've not made the claim that either Hillary or Trump will be installed as President. Fact still stands, she knew she had idiots like you who would swallow like bitches the Russian collusion fraud. She knew that she had the help of the Obama DOJ, FBI and CIA. And she knew that she had people like you in her corner who would happily lie their asses off for her, and turn a blind eye to her paying Russians for dirt in order to impact the 2016 election.




    Russia wanted Daddy to win and interfered in the election. That statement is factual and beyond serious debate.

    Did Daddy win because of Russia's interference? No way of knowing.

    I haven't moved.
    The statement isn't factual
    Your argument is with every serious person in either party.

    Now I realize that serves this populist "pox on both your houses" instinct you and the other gals gravitate to. But the politics of grievance isn't really a cohesive, lasting movement, and judging by one of your posts today, you yourself are ready to jettison the singular personality that allowed your cult hold together for a while.

    Good luck.
    Lot of words to just say you were talking out your ass Dazzler. And of course dodging the question you were asked like the lying Kunt you are was expected.
    Like PIPS's non-explanation about why Putin would prefer a pro-American pro-energy independent Trump versus an America hating PIPS who supports open borders and energy dependence. The next question is how did Putin "steal" the election?
    Gasbag is having a hard time seeing why the guy who threatened the NATO alliance and tried to remove sanctions on Russia as one of his very first acts was preferred by Putin.

    It's tuff!
    Threatened the NATO alliance. Classic.

    Tell us another whiteboard hoax lie, Dazzler. Along with the famous Russian state narrative.

    Trying to get NATO members to pay their share is a threat to the NATO alliance.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Should have filed 63 lawsuits and had her followers storm the Capitol.

    No need to do that. She knew she already had the permanent bureaucracy, the MSM, the National Security state and useful idiots like you in her corner available to carry out all the dirty work she needed.





    So when is she going to be installed as President?
    I don't know, I've not made the claim that either Hillary or Trump will be installed as President. Fact still stands, she knew she had idiots like you who would swallow like bitches the Russian collusion fraud. She knew that she had the help of the Obama DOJ, FBI and CIA. And she knew that she had people like you in her corner who would happily lie their asses off for her, and turn a blind eye to her paying Russians for dirt in order to impact the 2016 election.




    Russia wanted Daddy to win and interfered in the election. That statement is factual and beyond serious debate.

    Did Daddy win because of Russia's interference? No way of knowing.

    I haven't moved.
    The statement isn't factual
    Your argument is with every serious person in either party.

    Now I realize that serves this populist "pox on both your houses" instinct you and the other gals gravitate to. But the politics of grievance isn't really a cohesive, lasting movement, and judging by one of your posts today, you yourself are ready to jettison the singular personality that allowed your cult hold together for a while.

    Good luck.
    Lot of words to just say you were talking out your ass Dazzler. And of course dodging the question you were asked like the lying Kunt you are was expected.
    Like PIPS's non-explanation about why Putin would prefer a pro-American pro-energy independent Trump versus an America hating PIPS who supports open borders and energy dependence. The next question is how did Putin "steal" the election?
    Gasbag is having a hard time seeing why the guy who threatened the NATO alliance and tried to remove sanctions on Russia as one of his very first acts was preferred by Putin.

    It's tuff!
    Threatened the NATO alliance. Classic.

    Tell us another whiteboard hoax lie, Dazzler. Along with the famous Russian state narrative.

    PT is a gal who never ever would have told the Emperor he had no clothes on.
    I'm hearing trump tried to start ww3

    But even if he didn't he left the situation for it



    When does Biden become culpable for shit.

    And honestly I don't care about Ukraine.


    Unless we must import Ukrainian women along with venezuelan women. Maybe this is our moral prerogative
    The subject is whether the NATO alliance was threatened by Daddy's presidency.

    I'm happy to agree that Biden is very much to blame for NATO's resurgence.
    NATO is worthless to the Ukraine

    Your daddy didn't do shit
    Calm down gal.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,628
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Should have filed 63 lawsuits and had her followers storm the Capitol.

    No need to do that. She knew she already had the permanent bureaucracy, the MSM, the National Security state and useful idiots like you in her corner available to carry out all the dirty work she needed.





    So when is she going to be installed as President?
    I don't know, I've not made the claim that either Hillary or Trump will be installed as President. Fact still stands, she knew she had idiots like you who would swallow like bitches the Russian collusion fraud. She knew that she had the help of the Obama DOJ, FBI and CIA. And she knew that she had people like you in her corner who would happily lie their asses off for her, and turn a blind eye to her paying Russians for dirt in order to impact the 2016 election.




    Russia wanted Daddy to win and interfered in the election. That statement is factual and beyond serious debate.

    Did Daddy win because of Russia's interference? No way of knowing.

    I haven't moved.
    The statement isn't factual
    Your argument is with every serious person in either party.

    Now I realize that serves this populist "pox on both your houses" instinct you and the other gals gravitate to. But the politics of grievance isn't really a cohesive, lasting movement, and judging by one of your posts today, you yourself are ready to jettison the singular personality that allowed your cult hold together for a while.

    Good luck.
    Lot of words to just say you were talking out your ass Dazzler. And of course dodging the question you were asked like the lying Kunt you are was expected.
    Like PIPS's non-explanation about why Putin would prefer a pro-American pro-energy independent Trump versus an America hating PIPS who supports open borders and energy dependence. The next question is how did Putin "steal" the election?
    Gasbag is having a hard time seeing why the guy who threatened the NATO alliance and tried to remove sanctions on Russia as one of his very first acts was preferred by Putin.

    It's tuff!
    Threatened the NATO alliance. Classic.

    Tell us another whiteboard hoax lie, Dazzler. Along with the famous Russian state narrative.

    Trying to get NATO members to pay their share is a threat to the NATO alliance.
    I'm sure calling NATO "obsolete" inspired enormous confidence.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,113
    HHusky said:


    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Should have filed 63 lawsuits and had her followers storm the Capitol.

    No need to do that. She knew she already had the permanent bureaucracy, the MSM, the National Security state and useful idiots like you in her corner available to carry out all the dirty work she needed.





    So when is she going to be installed as President?
    I don't know, I've not made the claim that either Hillary or Trump will be installed as President. Fact still stands, she knew she had idiots like you who would swallow like bitches the Russian collusion fraud. She knew that she had the help of the Obama DOJ, FBI and CIA. And she knew that she had people like you in her corner who would happily lie their asses off for her, and turn a blind eye to her paying Russians for dirt in order to impact the 2016 election.




    Russia wanted Daddy to win and interfered in the election. That statement is factual and beyond serious debate.

    Did Daddy win because of Russia's interference? No way of knowing.

    I haven't moved.
    The statement isn't factual
    Your argument is with every serious person in either party.

    Now I realize that serves this populist "pox on both your houses" instinct you and the other gals gravitate to. But the politics of grievance isn't really a cohesive, lasting movement, and judging by one of your posts today, you yourself are ready to jettison the singular personality that allowed your cult hold together for a while.

    Good luck.
    Lot of words to just say you were talking out your ass Dazzler. And of course dodging the question you were asked like the lying Kunt you are was expected.
    Like PIPS's non-explanation about why Putin would prefer a pro-American pro-energy independent Trump versus an America hating PIPS who supports open borders and energy dependence. The next question is how did Putin "steal" the election?
    Gasbag is having a hard time seeing why the guy who threatened the NATO alliance and tried to remove sanctions on Russia as one of his very first acts was preferred by Putin.

    It's tuff!
    Threatened the NATO alliance. Classic.

    Tell us another whiteboard hoax lie, Dazzler. Along with the famous Russian state narrative.

    Trying to get NATO members to pay their share is a threat to the NATO alliance.
    I'm sure calling NATO "obsolete" inspired enormous confidence.
    I'm sure you talked out your ass and are now pathtically comparing a demand that NATO members pay their obligations is a "threat" to the Alliance.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,628
    <
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:


    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Should have filed 63 lawsuits and had her followers storm the Capitol.

    No need to do that. She knew she already had the permanent bureaucracy, the MSM, the National Security state and useful idiots like you in her corner available to carry out all the dirty work she needed.





    So when is she going to be installed as President?
    I don't know, I've not made the claim that either Hillary or Trump will be installed as President. Fact still stands, she knew she had idiots like you who would swallow like bitches the Russian collusion fraud. She knew that she had the help of the Obama DOJ, FBI and CIA. And she knew that she had people like you in her corner who would happily lie their asses off for her, and turn a blind eye to her paying Russians for dirt in order to impact the 2016 election.




    Russia wanted Daddy to win and interfered in the election. That statement is factual and beyond serious debate.

    Did Daddy win because of Russia's interference? No way of knowing.

    I haven't moved.
    The statement isn't factual
    Your argument is with every serious person in either party.

    Now I realize that serves this populist "pox on both your houses" instinct you and the other gals gravitate to. But the politics of grievance isn't really a cohesive, lasting movement, and judging by one of your posts today, you yourself are ready to jettison the singular personality that allowed your cult hold together for a while.

    Good luck.
    Lot of words to just say you were talking out your ass Dazzler. And of course dodging the question you were asked like the lying Kunt you are was expected.
    Like PIPS's non-explanation about why Putin would prefer a pro-American pro-energy independent Trump versus an America hating PIPS who supports open borders and energy dependence. The next question is how did Putin "steal" the election?
    Gasbag is having a hard time seeing why the guy who threatened the NATO alliance and tried to remove sanctions on Russia as one of his very first acts was preferred by Putin.

    It's tuff!
    Threatened the NATO alliance. Classic.

    Tell us another whiteboard hoax lie, Dazzler. Along with the famous Russian state narrative.

    Trying to get NATO members to pay their share is a threat to the NATO alliance.
    I'm sure calling NATO "obsolete" inspired enormous confidence.
    I'm sure you talked out your ass and are now pathtically comparing a demand that NATO members pay their obligations is a "threat" to the Alliance.
    So you prefer not to deal with the comment, which our allies seized upon, for obvious reasons.

    Or his failure to reaffirm Article 5 when that reaffirmation had been promised.

    An awful lot of Daddy's bitching about supposed unpaid obligations proved to be spurious, btw.

    But he didn't weaken the alliance. Obviously.

  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,868 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Should have filed 63 lawsuits and had her followers storm the Capitol.

    No need to do that. She knew she already had the permanent bureaucracy, the MSM, the National Security state and useful idiots like you in her corner available to carry out all the dirty work she needed.





    So when is she going to be installed as President?
    I don't know, I've not made the claim that either Hillary or Trump will be installed as President. Fact still stands, she knew she had idiots like you who would swallow like bitches the Russian collusion fraud. She knew that she had the help of the Obama DOJ, FBI and CIA. And she knew that she had people like you in her corner who would happily lie their asses off for her, and turn a blind eye to her paying Russians for dirt in order to impact the 2016 election.




    Russia wanted Daddy to win and interfered in the election. That statement is factual and beyond serious debate.

    Did Daddy win because of Russia's interference? No way of knowing.

    I haven't moved.
    The statement isn't factual
    Your argument is with every serious person in either party.

    Now I realize that serves this populist "pox on both your houses" instinct you and the other gals gravitate to. But the politics of grievance isn't really a cohesive, lasting movement, and judging by one of your posts today, you yourself are ready to jettison the singular personality that allowed your cult hold together for a while.

    Good luck.
    Lot of words to just say you were talking out your ass Dazzler. And of course dodging the question you were asked like the lying Kunt you are was expected.
    Like PIPS's non-explanation about why Putin would prefer a pro-American pro-energy independent Trump versus an America hating PIPS who supports open borders and energy dependence. The next question is how did Putin "steal" the election?
    Gasbag is having a hard time seeing why the guy who threatened the NATO alliance and tried to remove sanctions on Russia as one of his very first acts was preferred by Putin.

    It's tuff!
    Threatened the NATO alliance. Classic.

    Tell us another whiteboard hoax lie, Dazzler. Along with the famous Russian state narrative.

    PT is a gal who never ever would have told the Emperor he had no clothes on.
    The fuck are you babbling about now?

  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,113
    edited April 2022
    HHusky said:

    <

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:


    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Should have filed 63 lawsuits and had her followers storm the Capitol.

    No need to do that. She knew she already had the permanent bureaucracy, the MSM, the National Security state and useful idiots like you in her corner available to carry out all the dirty work she needed.





    So when is she going to be installed as President?
    I don't know, I've not made the claim that either Hillary or Trump will be installed as President. Fact still stands, she knew she had idiots like you who would swallow like bitches the Russian collusion fraud. She knew that she had the help of the Obama DOJ, FBI and CIA. And she knew that she had people like you in her corner who would happily lie their asses off for her, and turn a blind eye to her paying Russians for dirt in order to impact the 2016 election.




    Russia wanted Daddy to win and interfered in the election. That statement is factual and beyond serious debate.

    Did Daddy win because of Russia's interference? No way of knowing.

    I haven't moved.
    The statement isn't factual
    Your argument is with every serious person in either party.

    Now I realize that serves this populist "pox on both your houses" instinct you and the other gals gravitate to. But the politics of grievance isn't really a cohesive, lasting movement, and judging by one of your posts today, you yourself are ready to jettison the singular personality that allowed your cult hold together for a while.

    Good luck.
    Lot of words to just say you were talking out your ass Dazzler. And of course dodging the question you were asked like the lying Kunt you are was expected.
    Like PIPS's non-explanation about why Putin would prefer a pro-American pro-energy independent Trump versus an America hating PIPS who supports open borders and energy dependence. The next question is how did Putin "steal" the election?
    Gasbag is having a hard time seeing why the guy who threatened the NATO alliance and tried to remove sanctions on Russia as one of his very first acts was preferred by Putin.

    It's tuff!
    Threatened the NATO alliance. Classic.

    Tell us another whiteboard hoax lie, Dazzler. Along with the famous Russian state narrative.

    Trying to get NATO members to pay their share is a threat to the NATO alliance.
    I'm sure calling NATO "obsolete" inspired enormous confidence.
    I'm sure you talked out your ass and are now pathtically comparing a demand that NATO members pay their obligations is a "threat" to the Alliance.
    So you prefer not to deal with the comment, which our allies seized upon, for obvious reasons.

    Or his failure to reaffirm Article 5 when that reaffirmation had been promised.

    An awful lot of Daddy's bitching about supposed unpaid obligations proved to be spurious, btw.

    But he didn't weaken the alliance. Obviously.

    You mean our "allies" who were free riding off of the American taxpayer for years were upset when they were publicly called out for it and asked to stop being such deadbeats? Those allies?
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,628
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    <

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:


    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Should have filed 63 lawsuits and had her followers storm the Capitol.

    No need to do that. She knew she already had the permanent bureaucracy, the MSM, the National Security state and useful idiots like you in her corner available to carry out all the dirty work she needed.





    So when is she going to be installed as President?
    I don't know, I've not made the claim that either Hillary or Trump will be installed as President. Fact still stands, she knew she had idiots like you who would swallow like bitches the Russian collusion fraud. She knew that she had the help of the Obama DOJ, FBI and CIA. And she knew that she had people like you in her corner who would happily lie their asses off for her, and turn a blind eye to her paying Russians for dirt in order to impact the 2016 election.




    Russia wanted Daddy to win and interfered in the election. That statement is factual and beyond serious debate.

    Did Daddy win because of Russia's interference? No way of knowing.

    I haven't moved.
    The statement isn't factual
    Your argument is with every serious person in either party.

    Now I realize that serves this populist "pox on both your houses" instinct you and the other gals gravitate to. But the politics of grievance isn't really a cohesive, lasting movement, and judging by one of your posts today, you yourself are ready to jettison the singular personality that allowed your cult hold together for a while.

    Good luck.
    Lot of words to just say you were talking out your ass Dazzler. And of course dodging the question you were asked like the lying Kunt you are was expected.
    Like PIPS's non-explanation about why Putin would prefer a pro-American pro-energy independent Trump versus an America hating PIPS who supports open borders and energy dependence. The next question is how did Putin "steal" the election?
    Gasbag is having a hard time seeing why the guy who threatened the NATO alliance and tried to remove sanctions on Russia as one of his very first acts was preferred by Putin.

    It's tuff!
    Threatened the NATO alliance. Classic.

    Tell us another whiteboard hoax lie, Dazzler. Along with the famous Russian state narrative.

    Trying to get NATO members to pay their share is a threat to the NATO alliance.
    I'm sure calling NATO "obsolete" inspired enormous confidence.
    I'm sure you talked out your ass and are now pathtically comparing a demand that NATO members pay their obligations is a "threat" to the Alliance.
    So you prefer not to deal with the comment, which our allies seized upon, for obvious reasons.

    Or his failure to reaffirm Article 5 when that reaffirmation had been promised.

    An awful lot of Daddy's bitching about supposed unpaid obligations proved to be spurious, btw.

    But he didn't weaken the alliance. Obviously.

    You mean our "allies" who were free riding off of the American taxpayer for years were upset when they were publicly called out for it and asked to stop being such deadbeats? Those allies?
    That was always hyperbole.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,113
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    <

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:


    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Should have filed 63 lawsuits and had her followers storm the Capitol.

    No need to do that. She knew she already had the permanent bureaucracy, the MSM, the National Security state and useful idiots like you in her corner available to carry out all the dirty work she needed.





    So when is she going to be installed as President?
    I don't know, I've not made the claim that either Hillary or Trump will be installed as President. Fact still stands, she knew she had idiots like you who would swallow like bitches the Russian collusion fraud. She knew that she had the help of the Obama DOJ, FBI and CIA. And she knew that she had people like you in her corner who would happily lie their asses off for her, and turn a blind eye to her paying Russians for dirt in order to impact the 2016 election.




    Russia wanted Daddy to win and interfered in the election. That statement is factual and beyond serious debate.

    Did Daddy win because of Russia's interference? No way of knowing.

    I haven't moved.
    The statement isn't factual
    Your argument is with every serious person in either party.

    Now I realize that serves this populist "pox on both your houses" instinct you and the other gals gravitate to. But the politics of grievance isn't really a cohesive, lasting movement, and judging by one of your posts today, you yourself are ready to jettison the singular personality that allowed your cult hold together for a while.

    Good luck.
    Lot of words to just say you were talking out your ass Dazzler. And of course dodging the question you were asked like the lying Kunt you are was expected.
    Like PIPS's non-explanation about why Putin would prefer a pro-American pro-energy independent Trump versus an America hating PIPS who supports open borders and energy dependence. The next question is how did Putin "steal" the election?
    Gasbag is having a hard time seeing why the guy who threatened the NATO alliance and tried to remove sanctions on Russia as one of his very first acts was preferred by Putin.

    It's tuff!
    Threatened the NATO alliance. Classic.

    Tell us another whiteboard hoax lie, Dazzler. Along with the famous Russian state narrative.

    Trying to get NATO members to pay their share is a threat to the NATO alliance.
    I'm sure calling NATO "obsolete" inspired enormous confidence.
    I'm sure you talked out your ass and are now pathtically comparing a demand that NATO members pay their obligations is a "threat" to the Alliance.
    So you prefer not to deal with the comment, which our allies seized upon, for obvious reasons.

    Or his failure to reaffirm Article 5 when that reaffirmation had been promised.

    An awful lot of Daddy's bitching about supposed unpaid obligations proved to be spurious, btw.

    But he didn't weaken the alliance. Obviously.

    You mean our "allies" who were free riding off of the American taxpayer for years were upset when they were publicly called out for it and asked to stop being such deadbeats? Those allies?
    That was always hyperbole.
    Look at Mr. photo ID is Jim Crow 2.0 complain about hyperbole.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,628
    edited April 2022
    "Many countries owe us a tremendous amount of money from many years back, where they're delinquent as far as I'm concerned, because the United States has had to pay for them. So if you go back 10 or 20 years, you'll just add it all up, it's massive amounts of money is owed." -- President Daddy

    I was far too fair in calling it "hyperbole".

    There wasn't a speck of truth in this. He made it up.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,113
    HHusky said:

    "Many countries owe us a tremendous amount of money from many years back, where they're delinquent as far as I'm concerned, because the United States has had to pay for them. So if you go back 10 or 20 years, you'll just add it all up, it's massive amounts of money is owed." -- President Daddy

    I was far too fair in calling it "hyperbole".

    There wasn't a speck of truth in this. He made it up.

    Really? Everyone was paying what they were supposed to be paying? For a guy who loves to flyspeck other people's words you sure a lying piece of shit yourself Dazzler.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited April 2022
    HHusky said:

    "Many countries owe us a tremendous amount of money from many years back, where they're delinquent as far as I'm concerned, because the United States has had to pay for them. So if you go back 10 or 20 years, you'll just add it all up, it's massive amounts of money is owed." -- President Daddy

    I was far too fair in calling it "hyperbole".

    There wasn't a speck of truth in this. He made it up.

    Fuck off.

    https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/11/trumps-nato-criticism-is-valid-europe-isnt-spending-enough-on-def.html

    Pay the agreed upon 2% or EMFA. These countries are supposedly so much more enlightened than the US with their social spending, but then can’t “afford” their basic obligations to defense.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,113

    HHusky said:

    "Many countries owe us a tremendous amount of money from many years back, where they're delinquent as far as I'm concerned, because the United States has had to pay for them. So if you go back 10 or 20 years, you'll just add it all up, it's massive amounts of money is owed." -- President Daddy

    I was far too fair in calling it "hyperbole".

    There wasn't a speck of truth in this. He made it up.

    Fuck off.

    https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/11/trumps-nato-criticism-is-valid-europe-isnt-spending-enough-on-def.html

    Pay the agreed upon 2% or EMFA. These countries are supposedly so much more enlightened than the US with their social spending, but then can’t “afford” their basic obligations to defense.
    Not a speck of that is the truth.
Sign In or Register to comment.