That's now the official position of the entire Rat party. They reject any limitation on abortion. They actually made this part of the party platform in 2016. The party of infanticide cares about the children.
That's now the official position of the entire Rat party. They reject any limitation on abortion. They actually made this part of the party platform in 2016. The party of infanticide cares about the children.
I'm for limited abortion choice(when you take a pill only) but that's it... this shit is barbaric
That's now the official position of the entire Rat party. They reject any limitation on abortion. They actually made this part of the party platform in 2016. The party of infanticide cares about the children.
I'm for limited abortion choice(when you take a pill only) but that's it... this shit is barbaric
First 3 months. Allowing an abortion at 8 months is nothing less than infanticide. Which is what all people who care about children do, right Kobe?
That's now the official position of the entire Rat party. They reject any limitation on abortion. They actually made this part of the party platform in 2016. The party of infanticide cares about the children.
Liberals have never met an ultrasound image they wouldn’t abort.
That's now the official position of the entire Rat party. They reject any limitation on abortion. They actually made this part of the party platform in 2016. The party of infanticide cares about the children.
I'm for limited abortion choice(when you take a pill only) but that's it... this shit is barbaric
First 3 months. Allowing an abortion at 8 months is nothing less than infanticide. Which is what all people who care about children do, right Kobe?
We are in agreement here. Although philosophically there is never a morally logical or "right" place at which to draw the line - I've thought, read and talked about this for a long time - I've concluded that, although there's no reconciling it, first 3 mos makes sense and is a necessary albeit unpleasant reality for our society.
Whether the mythical and tightly crafted "right to privacy" used by the Court actually exists is another story
After covid and vaccines especially
Race channeling Billy Rehnquist and Byron the Wizard Buff in the great dissent, say that right to privacy is made up (which, going beyond abortion, is an interesting concept itself):
In his dissenting opinion, Justice William H. Rehnquist argued that the framers of the 14th Amendment did not intend for it to protect a right of privacy, a right which they did not recognize and that they definitely did not intend for it to protect a woman’s decision to have an abortion. Justice Rehnquist further argued that the only right to privacy is that which is protected by the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition of unreasonable searches and seizures. The Ninth Amendment does not apply here, he wrote.
Finally, he concluded that because this issue required a careful balance of the interests of the woman against the interests of the state, it was not an appropriate decision for the Court to make, but instead was a question that should have been left up to state legislatures to resolve.
Now do the % of the millions and millions of murdered babies each year which are African-American. Margaret Sanger and Gates senior knew what they were doing.
Now do the % of the millions and millions of murdered babies each year which are African-American. Margaret Sanger and Gates senior knew what they were doing.
I doubt TKS has ever looked at what Margaret actually said about exterminating blacks. TKS is that stupid and ill informed. Scary actually.
Comments
I don't think that word means what Kobe thinks it means.
Protecting the children
Team de-population at work right thur.
Oklahoma with the over reach. Colorado same. Guess which is the BIG issue in the coming months
Both Big 8 teams are wrong
States can regulate it 3 months plus one day
That's a legal hot take
Whether the mythical and tightly crafted "right to privacy" used by the Court actually exists is another story
After covid and vaccines especially
I'm not calling Durbin a pedophile though.
New case law
In his dissenting opinion, Justice William H. Rehnquist argued that the framers of the 14th Amendment did not intend for it to protect a right of privacy, a right which they did not recognize and that they definitely did not intend for it to protect a woman’s decision to have an abortion. Justice Rehnquist further argued that the only right to privacy is that which is protected by the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition of unreasonable searches and seizures. The Ninth Amendment does not apply here, he wrote.
Finally, he concluded that because this issue required a careful balance of the interests of the woman against the interests of the state, it was not an appropriate decision for the Court to make, but instead was a question that should have been left up to state legislatures to resolve.