She defends pedophiles and the Senate Rats protect her

SFGbob

http://twitter.com/CalebJHull/status/1506713052447752205?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1506713052447752205%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitchy.com%2Fbrettt-3136%2F2022%2F03%2F23%2Fsen-dick-durbin-runs-interference-for-ketanji-brown-jackson-over-one-question-from-sen-ted-cruz-about-sentencing%2F

Goduckies

Peace of shit

RaceBannon

When the facts are against you...

http://twitter.com/donwinslow/status/1506753406110560261?t=Zka_EbBLRfM_AMd8GvC5UQ&s=19

http://twitter.com/BMeiselas/status/1506780484226846723?t=bu4MzxMjWGVaYh2K8r45UQ&s=19

Insulting, racist, and sexist

Poor baby can't take the heat like white men

My fake wife laughs at the portrayal of the helpless victim

46XiJCAB

RaceBannon said:

When the facts are against you...

http://twitter.com/donwinslow/status/1506753406110560261?t=Zka_EbBLRfM_AMd8GvC5UQ&s=19

http://twitter.com/BMeiselas/status/1506780484226846723?t=bu4MzxMjWGVaYh2K8r45UQ&s=19

Insulting, racist, and sexist

Poor baby can't take the heat like white men

My fake wife laughs at the portrayal of the helpless victim

#MineToo

46XiJCAB

WaPo Ed. Board says Republicans treating Jackson worse than Kavanaugh was treated.

Clearly

HHusky

46XiJCAB said:

WaPo Ed. Board says Republicans treating Jackson worse than Kavanaugh was treated.

Clearly

Needs to clarify that she likes beer.

UW_Doog_Bot

HHusky said:

46XiJCAB said:

WaPo Ed. Board says Republicans treating Jackson worse than Kavanaugh was treated.

Clearly

Needs to clarify that she likes beer.

Needs to produce alibis from 20 years ago to prove she's not a rapist. Guilty until proven innocent.

46XiJCAB

HHusky said:

46XiJCAB said:

WaPo Ed. Board says Republicans treating Jackson worse than Kavanaugh was treated.

Clearly

Needs to clarify that she likes beer.

You're such a fucking hack. Did your dog kick you yet today? Poor thing probably realizes what a shitty human it has.

RaceBannon

http://twitter.com/NoLieWithBTC/status/1507088502059675649?t=D1xnPEX7QUj78G0Z_-8wiA&s=19

Goduckies

RaceBannon said:

http://twitter.com/NoLieWithBTC/status/1507088502059675649?t=D1xnPEX7QUj78G0Z_-8wiA&s=19

Most qualified? Yes qualified means black woman that she can't define.

And no lie... uh uh uh

46XiJCAB

Cocaine Mitch is a no vote. Jackson isn’t remotely qualified. Her non-answers and inability to define a woman disqualify her. She’s nothing more than your typical leftist radical posing as an unbiased jurist.

LoneStarDawg

MikeDamone

Herr Dazzler loves to protect abusers. Why? What's in it for him?



They should get due process, a fair trial, and a sentence that fits the crime. Consuming is no different than producing. Her argument seems to be that in the past a pedo had to get physical pictures so it was harder to collect a lot. Now the internet makes it easier to get thousands of pictures so without the internet, the pedo wouldn't have as many. Or maybe even none. So they should get a lighter sentence. Solid.

WestlinnDuck

MikeDamone said:

Herr Dazzler loves to protect abusers. Why? What's in it for him?



They should get due process, a fair trial, and a sentence that fits the crime. Consuming is no different than producing. Her argument seems to be that in the past a pedo had to get physical pictures so it was harder to collect a lot. Now the internet makes it easier to get thousands of pictures so without the internet, the pedo wouldn't have as many. Or maybe even none. So they should get a lighter sentence. Solid.

So, the demand for child porn goes up so more child porn is made which requires more children involved with, as the dazzler put it, "sick images". Definitely, deserving of materially lighter sentencing. Just don't make is some moral issue. Think of the real victim.

Goduckies

WestlinnDuck said:

MikeDamone said:

Herr Dazzler loves to protect abusers. Why? What's in it for him?



They should get due process, a fair trial, and a sentence that fits the crime. Consuming is no different than producing. Her argument seems to be that in the past a pedo had to get physical pictures so it was harder to collect a lot. Now the internet makes it easier to get thousands of pictures so without the internet, the pedo wouldn't have as many. Or maybe even none. So they should get a lighter sentence. Solid.

So, the demand for child porn goes up so more child porn is made which requires more children involved with, as the dazzler put it, "sick images". Definitely, deserving of materially lighter sentencing. Just don't make is some moral issue. Think of the real victim.

The real victim, you mean the black pedophile?

WestlinnDuck

Goduckies said:

WestlinnDuck said:

MikeDamone said:

Herr Dazzler loves to protect abusers. Why? What's in it for him?



They should get due process, a fair trial, and a sentence that fits the crime. Consuming is no different than producing. Her argument seems to be that in the past a pedo had to get physical pictures so it was harder to collect a lot. Now the internet makes it easier to get thousands of pictures so without the internet, the pedo wouldn't have as many. Or maybe even none. So they should get a lighter sentence. Solid.

So, the demand for child porn goes up so more child porn is made which requires more children involved with, as the dazzler put it, "sick images". Definitely, deserving of materially lighter sentencing. Just don't make is some moral issue. Think of the real victim.

The real victim, you mean the black pedophile?

Black or white. That's Jackson's view. She is a pedo apologist.

RaceBannon

How you know you hit truth

http://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/1505286273031880705?t=OFgm0FWbEgC4r1sca7p4PQ&s=19

WestlinnDuck

RaceBannon said:

How you know you hit truth

http://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/1505286273031880705?t=OFgm0FWbEgC4r1sca7p4PQ&s=19

And Bezos thought that putting, "Democracy dies in darkness" on his paper was some sort of great virtue signaling.

46XiJCAB

WaPo is not a newspaper. It’s a DIM newsletter.

MikeDamone

WestlinnDuck said:

MikeDamone said:

Herr Dazzler loves to protect abusers. Why? What's in it for him?



They should get due process, a fair trial, and a sentence that fits the crime. Consuming is no different than producing. Her argument seems to be that in the past a pedo had to get physical pictures so it was harder to collect a lot. Now the internet makes it easier to get thousands of pictures so without the internet, the pedo wouldn't have as many. Or maybe even none. So they should get a lighter sentence. Solid.

So, the demand for child porn goes up so more child porn is made which requires more children involved with, as the dazzler put it, "sick images". Definitely, deserving of materially lighter sentencing. Just don't make is some moral issue. Think of the real victim.

You noticed Herr Dazzlers softening of the description too. He can’t say child pornography. It gets characterized as “sick images”. The same as a picture of a pile of dog shit.