I think you can give the Sark regime a C+ but Sark a C-.
If Woodward does not pay up for Wilcox, Tosh, etc...Sark goes 4-8 in 2012 and probably 7-6 in 2013. I give Sark little credit for the 9-4 and top 15 metrics 2013 team. He deserves a little credit for changing the offense but thats it.
He basically inherited a 5 win team and could not exceed 7 wins. A competent coach (not a Petersen type) would have taken UW to 9-10 wins.
Sark is the greatest coach to ever grace the sidelines of Husky Stadium. It's a shame that an unproven coach will now be given credit for the foundation he set and the personal sacrifice he made for UW.
As Sark returns USC to Carroll'esque glory, HHB's will regret the day they drove him away. The crime in all this is that they will never be held accountable for the permanent damage they've caused the program as they hid behind their anonymity.
I think you can give the Sark regime a C+ but Sark a C-.
If Woodward does not pay up for Wilcox, Tosh, etc...Sark goes 4-8 in 2012 and probably 7-6 in 2013. I give Sark little credit for the 9-4 and top 15 metrics 2013 team. He deserves a little credit for changing the offense but thats it.
He basically inherited a 5 win team and could not exceed 7 wins. A competent coach (not a Petersen type) would have taken UW to 9-10 wins.
I think you can give the Sark regime a C+ but Sark a C-.
If Woodward does not pay up for Wilcox, Tosh, etc...Sark goes 4-8 in 2012 and probably 7-6 in 2013. I give Sark little credit for the 9-4 and top 15 metrics 2013 team. He deserves a little credit for changing the offense but thats it.
He basically inherited a 5 win team and could not exceed 7 wins. A competent coach (not a Petersen type) would have taken UW to 9-10 wins.
I place 2008 squarely on Mark Emmert. How fucking hard would you work if you were fired, but then reinstated later.
Gilby was worse than Tyrone, an utter fucking failure on all levels. Giving Tyrone an F and Sark a C is too much distance between the two. Exclude 2008 and there wasn't a huge difference between Ty and Sark.
I think you can give the Sark regime a C+ but Sark a C-.
If Woodward does not pay up for Wilcox, Tosh, etc...Sark goes 4-8 in 2012 and probably 7-6 in 2013. I give Sark little credit for the 9-4 and top 15 metrics 2013 team. He deserves a little credit for changing the offense but thats it.
He basically inherited a 5 win team and could not exceed 7 wins. A competent coach (not a Petersen type) would have taken UW to 9-10 wins.
Willingham gets a D and Gilby an F.
Oh god here comes the Wilcox love fest again. Improved us from 5-4 to 5-4.
I place 2008 squarely on Mark Emmert. How fucking hard would you work if you were fired, but then reinstated later.
Gilby was worse than Tyrone, an utter fucking failure on all levels. Giving Tyrone an F and Sark a C is too much distance between the two. Exclude 2008 and there wasn't a huge difference between Ty and Sark.
C- And he was not a B recruiter. A B recruiter would have gotten at least one OL guy from the famous bumper crop. He was a C. He inherited a even win talent and won 7 games on average. A C is average. I give him a minus for talking and not ever backing it up.
I think you can give the Sark regime a C+ but Sark a C-.
If Woodward does not pay up for Wilcox, Tosh, etc...Sark goes 4-8 in 2012 and probably 7-6 in 2013. I give Sark little credit for the 9-4 and top 15 metrics 2013 team. He deserves a little credit for changing the offense but thats it.
He basically inherited a 5 win team and could not exceed 7 wins. A competent coach (not a Petersen type) would have taken UW to 9-10 wins.
Willingham gets a D and Gilby an F.
Oh god here comes the Wilcox love fest again. Improved us from 5-4 to 5-4.
I can sort of understand wilcox but tosh? what the fuck did tosh ever do for this program that effected them in 2012. Never have I seen an assistant coach get more credit for accomplishing so little
A-. He was the best play caller in the country and made football fun again. He was also very good with the media. I just wish he recruited a couple more lineman and didn't hire Nick Holt.
Comments
Best play caller in America
Great recruiter, everybody says so
Kick ass pressers and memorials
Master motivator
Hip style
Big time on social media
If Woodward does not pay up for Wilcox, Tosh, etc...Sark goes 4-8 in 2012 and probably 7-6 in 2013. I give Sark little credit for the 9-4 and top 15 metrics 2013 team. He deserves a little credit for changing the offense but thats it.
He basically inherited a 5 win team and could not exceed 7 wins. A competent coach (not a Petersen type) would have taken UW to 9-10 wins.
Willingham gets a D and Gilby an F.
this. Willingham gets a fucking Z
Gilby was worse than Tyrone, an utter fucking failure on all levels. Giving Tyrone an F and Sark a C is too much distance between the two. Exclude 2008 and there wasn't a huge difference between Ty and Sark.
HTH.
600 foot tsunami. 9.7 earthquake. massive fire. NOW
Is complete fucktard considered a grade?
You get a C for being average, which is exactly what he was
Sark was an OK salesman. Terrible closer. No self-awareness.
I don't have a problem with him banging Joey's waitresses either. I married a Bellevue Joey's girl shortly after he arrived.
I am now banned from anywhere within 100 yards of a Joey's, Twin-Peaks or other quality whoreish establishments. Oh the irony...
How does The Sark Cream Pie taste?