That's the issue with mail in, no chain of custody, that's why it is so hard to prove fraud, it's inherent in the system, it's also why HR1 has Mail voting in it, the Democrats know they stole 2020 from that and want it permanent.
That's the issue with mail in, no chain of custody, that's why it is so hard to prove fraud, it's inherent in the system, it's also why HR1 has Mail voting in it, the Democrats know they stole 2020 from that and want it permanent.
But we need more of this. To want fair elections is to be racist.
I think it was Penn that had 200K of the same. No effect on the election. Miniscule voter fraud. Not big at all. Most secure election ever. If you were a democrat candidate anyway.
Mail in voting fraud 100% happened and happens every election that has it. Its impossible to track. That's why my lib poli Sci professor hated it. Zero chain of custody.
I think it was Penn that had 200K of the same. No effect on the election. Miniscule voter fraud. Not big at all. Most secure election ever. If you were a democrat candidate anyway.
Pennsylvania just broke their constitution. Not a big deal. Quite common really
A Pennsylvania court struck down the state’s mail voting law Friday morning, saying voters must amend the state constitution before such legislation is legal.
The state immediately appealed the ruling to the state Supreme Court, meaning the law will remain in effect during the appeal process. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court is composed of five Democrats and two Republicans.
In her ruling earlier Friday, Commonwealth Court Judge Mary Hannah Leavitt, a Republican, wrote: “No-excuse mail-in voting makes the exercise of the franchise more convenient and has been used four times in the history of Pennsylvania. If presented to the people, a constitutional amendment to end the Article VII, Section 1 requirement of in-person voting is likely to be adopted. But a constitutional amendment must be presented to the people and adopted into our fundamental law before legislation authorizing no-excuse mail-in voting can 'be placed upon our statute books'.
Which is exactly what you said about Covid lab leak theory.
You haven't been following that story very closely, I see.
H pretends he has some great insight and information
Pretends
If you supported dishonest elections, what would you do differently from what the dazzler and the dems are supporting. They pretty much have it covered. The fact that the dazzler won't tell you that if you don't have internal controls, then there is going to be fraud and dishonesty lets you know all about his mythical MBA.
Comments
Why does everybody say you're so dumb?
Pennsylvania just broke their constitution. Not a big deal. Quite common really
A Pennsylvania court struck down the state’s mail voting law Friday morning, saying voters must amend the state constitution before such legislation is legal.
The state immediately appealed the ruling to the state Supreme Court, meaning the law will remain in effect during the appeal process. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court is composed of five Democrats and two Republicans.
In her ruling earlier Friday, Commonwealth Court Judge Mary Hannah Leavitt, a Republican, wrote: “No-excuse mail-in voting makes the exercise of the franchise more convenient and has been used four times in the history of Pennsylvania. If presented to the people, a constitutional amendment to end the Article VII, Section 1 requirement of in-person voting is likely to be adopted. But a constitutional amendment must be presented to the people and adopted into our fundamental law before legislation authorizing no-excuse mail-in voting can 'be placed upon our statute books'.
Pretends