Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Perfectly normal
RaceBannon
Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,737 
in Tug Tavern
https://newsmax.com/newsfront/eric-holder-redistricting-north-carolina/2022/02/22/id/1057956/
North Carolina has become the latest battleground for congressional map redistricting. Eric Holder is the chairman of the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, which formed to draw congressional districts favorable to Democrats.
The former attorney general's nonproft affiliate, National Redistricting Foundation, has financial ties to a North Carolina judge who could soon cast the decisive vote in a legal battle over the state’s congressional maps, The Washington Free Beacon reported.
The judge, Anita Earls, serves on the seven-member North Carolina Supreme Court, which will likely have the final say over which congressional maps the state adopts.
National Redistricting Foundation, endorsed and contributed $200,000 to elect the judge in 2018.
"Monied interests appear to have bought a supreme court justice to decide this redistricting case," state senator Amy Galey, a Republican, said to the Washington Free Beacon.
"Eric Holder paid six figures to elect Earls so she could decide this case," said Galey, who added that Earls should have recused herself from the redistricting case.
Republicans say Earls' ties to Holder are a conflict of interest and warrant her recusal from the redistricting case. Holder endorsed Earls in 2018 amid his push to elect state judges for the purpose of adopting Democrat-friendly congressional maps.
But 2020 was the cleanest election ever
North Carolina has become the latest battleground for congressional map redistricting. Eric Holder is the chairman of the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, which formed to draw congressional districts favorable to Democrats.
The former attorney general's nonproft affiliate, National Redistricting Foundation, has financial ties to a North Carolina judge who could soon cast the decisive vote in a legal battle over the state’s congressional maps, The Washington Free Beacon reported.
The judge, Anita Earls, serves on the seven-member North Carolina Supreme Court, which will likely have the final say over which congressional maps the state adopts.
National Redistricting Foundation, endorsed and contributed $200,000 to elect the judge in 2018.
"Monied interests appear to have bought a supreme court justice to decide this redistricting case," state senator Amy Galey, a Republican, said to the Washington Free Beacon.
"Eric Holder paid six figures to elect Earls so she could decide this case," said Galey, who added that Earls should have recused herself from the redistricting case.
Republicans say Earls' ties to Holder are a conflict of interest and warrant her recusal from the redistricting case. Holder endorsed Earls in 2018 amid his push to elect state judges for the purpose of adopting Democrat-friendly congressional maps.
But 2020 was the cleanest election ever
Comments