H and kobe pretending to care about damage to the economy and supporting fascists says it all
Really horrible people
'It's hurting the economy, you guys!' 'It's anarchy'
FAGS
Owning your own arguments to own the libs.
My argument is that censorship is fascism. And yes I owned you. Do you think before you post?
Do you think @DerekJohnson is a fascist for banning people here?
Take it up with Vanilla. I'm not sure if it's a terms of service thing or not, and I'm never really sure if you want to have an honest discussion or not. Either way, I'm certain that if Trump had asked for certain twitter accounts that were mean to him to be kicked off, that the crying left would have been up in arms. And if we are being honest, it's hard to believe, because there just are no funny left wing twitter accounts. And because all the hypocrisy is on the left.
So you are against fascism except for when it suits you.
I don’t think private companies enforcing a tos is fascism and I don’t think DJ banning people here is either.
Fair enough, we disagree. Technically, maybe, if the terms of service are clear and not arbitrary, I'd agree. In this case, I think you are aware of even left wing people being demonetized, kicked off youtube, etc and it isn't clear why. It's murky and it should be obvious what the politics are behind it. We still disagree and it's my opinion that the terms are not being fairly or objectively used. The pendulum can easily swing the other way too.
So you are against fascism except for when it suits you.
I don’t think private companies enforcing a tos is fascism and I don’t think DJ banning people here is either.
Fair enough, we disagree. Technically, maybe, if the terms of service are clear and not arbitrary, I'd agree. In this case, I think you are aware of even left wing people being demonetized, kicked off youtube, etc and it isn't clear why. It's murky and it should be obvious what the politics are behind it. We still disagree and it's my opinion that the terms are not being fairly or objectively used. The pendulum can easily swing the other way too.
I believe a world where companies can’t have a tos is significantly worse than one where they can.
Now those companies are always going to try and make their tos as murky as possible so they can enforce them however they want. They don’t want a set of rules that makes things fair, they want a set of rules that they can enforce arbitrarily so they can make decisions based on profit.
Essentially I’m saying it’s never going to be fair but it’s better than the alternative.
I also think a lot of this stuff is a mountain out of a mole hill. Right wing youtubers will lose their shit if a video gets demonized but that happens to left wingers all the time. It’s nothing to do with having a political position, it’s about the advertisers.
So you are against fascism except for when it suits you.
I don’t think private companies enforcing a tos is fascism and I don’t think DJ banning people here is either.
Fair enough, we disagree. Technically, maybe, if the terms of service are clear and not arbitrary, I'd agree. In this case, I think you are aware of even left wing people being demonetized, kicked off youtube, etc and it isn't clear why. It's murky and it should be obvious what the politics are behind it. We still disagree and it's my opinion that the terms are not being fairly or objectively used. The pendulum can easily swing the other way too.
I believe a world where companies can’t have a tos is significantly worse than one where they can.
Now those companies are always going to try and make their tos as murky as possible so they can enforce them however they want. They don’t want a set of rules that makes things fair, they want a set of rules that they can enforce arbitrarily so they can make decisions based on profit.
Essentially I’m saying it’s never going to be fair but it’s better than the alternative.
I also think a lot of this stuff is a mountain out of a mole hill. Right wing youtubers will lose their shit if a video gets demonized but that happens to left wingers all the time. It’s nothing to do with having a political position, it’s about the advertisers.
I don't agree that this is just innocent private companies going on their own and trying to stamp out obscenities. Nearly 100% of the time, videos are pulled, accounts are suspended, and content is demonetized because someone is threatened by the narrative. It's either woke activists or elites pulling the strings. That's what the problem is. It's what China is doing. I do see that it somehow doesn't threaten you now because of your politics. I'm against this kind of double secret probation. It never ends well. I still can't understand why more people on the left aren't against this kind of system.
I continue to enjoy you guys getting what you wanted and then “not like that”ing it.
Hurting the economy is the worst thing ever. If people have to die for the economy that’s fine. These truckers are hurting the economy “NOT LIKE THAT”.
Chumps.
The workers want the government mandates forced onto private citizens by private companies to change. Kind of sounds like they don’t like fascism.
Actual truckers, Canadian and American, overwhelmingly oppose this blockade. But American wing nuts love it.
Imagine the teamster Union being against freedom...
dodge
White flag from you. This should be your wet dream, wage slaves uniting against the man to protest unfair mandates that themselves are a drag on the economy. Instead you're all worked up and cheering on the government crackdown. Sad!
I'm a law and order guy.
Not like you "conservatives".
You're a hypocrite. We have values, you have ideology.
You "value" anarchy.
I missed when you stumped for all of the people losing their businesses when real, card carrying anarchists burnt down our cities for 6 months in 2020.
So you are against fascism except for when it suits you.
I don’t think private companies enforcing a tos is fascism and I don’t think DJ banning people here is either.
Fair enough, we disagree. Technically, maybe, if the terms of service are clear and not arbitrary, I'd agree. In this case, I think you are aware of even left wing people being demonetized, kicked off youtube, etc and it isn't clear why. It's murky and it should be obvious what the politics are behind it. We still disagree and it's my opinion that the terms are not being fairly or objectively used. The pendulum can easily swing the other way too.
I believe a world where companies can’t have a tos is significantly worse than one where they can.
Now those companies are always going to try and make their tos as murky as possible so they can enforce them however they want. They don’t want a set of rules that makes things fair, they want a set of rules that they can enforce arbitrarily so they can make decisions based on profit.
Essentially I’m saying it’s never going to be fair but it’s better than the alternative.
I also think a lot of this stuff is a mountain out of a mole hill. Right wing youtubers will lose their shit if a video gets demonized but that happens to left wingers all the time. It’s nothing to do with having a political position, it’s about the advertisers.
I don't agree that this is just innocent private companies going on their own and trying to stamp out obscenities. Nearly 100% of the time, videos are pulled, accounts are suspended, and content is demonetized because someone is threatened by the narrative. It's either woke activists or elites pulling the strings. That's what the problem is. It's what China is doing. I do see that it somehow doesn't threaten you now because of your politics. I'm against this kind of double secret probation. It never ends well. I still can't understand why more people on the left aren't against this kind of system.
It’s not that I’m not threatened, it’s that I think it’ll happen to my side regardless.
I see these arguments from the right like “if they do it to us they’ll do it to you”. Yeah but you would do it to me too.
I view the current Trump brand of republicanism as fascism. It is the worst outcome. So if the libs want to take a baseball bat to it, good. It’s about fucking time they did something.
Our fight will be our fight whether it’s you or them in power.
So you are against fascism except for when it suits you.
I don’t think private companies enforcing a tos is fascism and I don’t think DJ banning people here is either.
Fair enough, we disagree. Technically, maybe, if the terms of service are clear and not arbitrary, I'd agree. In this case, I think you are aware of even left wing people being demonetized, kicked off youtube, etc and it isn't clear why. It's murky and it should be obvious what the politics are behind it. We still disagree and it's my opinion that the terms are not being fairly or objectively used. The pendulum can easily swing the other way too.
I believe a world where companies can’t have a tos is significantly worse than one where they can.
Now those companies are always going to try and make their tos as murky as possible so they can enforce them however they want. They don’t want a set of rules that makes things fair, they want a set of rules that they can enforce arbitrarily so they can make decisions based on profit.
Essentially I’m saying it’s never going to be fair but it’s better than the alternative.
I also think a lot of this stuff is a mountain out of a mole hill. Right wing youtubers will lose their shit if a video gets demonized but that happens to left wingers all the time. It’s nothing to do with having a political position, it’s about the advertisers.
I don't agree that this is just innocent private companies going on their own and trying to stamp out obscenities. Nearly 100% of the time, videos are pulled, accounts are suspended, and content is demonetized because someone is threatened by the narrative. It's either woke activists or elites pulling the strings. That's what the problem is. It's what China is doing. I do see that it somehow doesn't threaten you now because of your politics. I'm against this kind of double secret probation. It never ends well. I still can't understand why more people on the left aren't against this kind of system.
It’s not that I’m not threatened, it’s that I think it’ll happen to my side regardless.
I see these arguments from the right like “if they do it to us they’ll do it to you”. Yeah but you would do it to me too.
I view the current Trump brand of republicanism as fascism. It is the worst outcome. So if the libs want to take a baseball bat to it, good. It’s about fucking time they did something.
Our fight will be our fight whether it’s you or them in power.
Comments
'It's anarchy'
FAGS
After the past 6 years of terrible takes the left has championed, it would be frustrating if someone had all the screenshots they need.
“There has been censorship here”
“Logical fallacy!”
Stick to “so I’m at a bar” posts.
But since you don't know shit...
Now those companies are always going to try and make their tos as murky as possible so they can enforce them however they want. They don’t want a set of rules that makes things fair, they want a set of rules that they can enforce arbitrarily so they can make decisions based on profit.
Essentially I’m saying it’s never going to be fair but it’s better than the alternative.
I also think a lot of this stuff is a mountain out of a mole hill. Right wing youtubers will lose their shit if a video gets demonized but that happens to left wingers all the time. It’s nothing to do with having a political position, it’s about the advertisers.
Must have been an oversight by me.
I see these arguments from the right like “if they do it to us they’ll do it to you”. Yeah but you would do it to me too.
I view the current Trump brand of republicanism as fascism. It is the worst outcome. So if the libs want to take a baseball bat to it, good. It’s about fucking time they did something.
Our fight will be our fight whether it’s you or them in power.