Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

A nation of Kobe's

SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,103
edited February 2022 in Tug Tavern
Shapiro makes a statement of fact and of course liberal snowflakes go into hysterics. And instead of telling the snowflakes to grow up, the Admin at Georgetown kowtows to them.




«1

Comments

  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,729 Standard Supporter
    Who is hiring these uneducated snowflakes? Kids I wouldn't trust to pick up the dog poop in the backyard are supposed to function in a competitive adult world? Can you imagine the slobberer handling a customer counter at McDonald's let alone an expresso machine at Starbucks?
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    A lot of folks dreaming of that huge payday.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,103
    46XiJCAB said:

    A lot of folks dreaming of that huge payday.

    How fucked up in the head must a young black woman, who lets be honest here, almost certainly only got into Georgetown Law because of the color of her skin, be to demand "reparations" because someone said a statement of fact that made her snatch hurt?

    Bitch, you've been getting your "reparations" your entire life. Your black skin has done nothing but help you your entire academic career. But is she greatful? Fuck no. Now she literally wants a free lunch because her feelings have been hurt. It's Michelle Obama only 45 years younger.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,627
    Some of us can recognize Shapiro’s statement was idiotic AND simultaneously recognize that college administrators are spineless twits.

    #NotMutuallyExclusive
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,103
    edited February 2022
    HHusky said:

    Some of us can recognize Shapiro’s statement was idiotic AND simultaneously recognize that college administrators are spineless twits.

    #NotMutuallyExclusive

    His statement was poorly worded, but only because asswholes like you and the people you vote for do nothing but wait to pounce on that kind of lame shit. Go ahead Kunt tell us why his statement was "idiotic?"

    He's absolutely right. And of course you say nothing about the students the "spineless twits" are caving to. I think we call those people your fellow Rat party voters Dazzler.


  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,627
    “Poorly worded”

    Yeah, that’s all it was.

    Of course.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,103
    edited February 2022
    HHusky said:

    “Poorly worded”

    Yeah, that’s all it was.

    Of course.

    So you can't tell us why it was "idiotic" Got it. As always, Dazzler runs his mouth and then performs a Kunt act when asked to explain why.

    You want to take a bet on if Biden's pick will come even close resume wise to the pick Shapiro mentioned Dazzler?

    I seem to recall you mentioning quite a few times that Clarence Thomas was an unimpressive legal lightweight who was picked only because of his skin color. I guess your standards have "evolved"
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,627
    edited February 2022
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    “Poorly worded”

    Yeah, that’s all it was.

    Of course.

    So you can't tell us why it was "idiotic" Got it.

    You want to take a bet on if Biden's pick will come even close resume wise to the pick Shapiro mentioned Dazzler?

    I seem to recall you mentioning quite a few times that Clarence Thomas was an unimpressive legal lightweight who was picked only because of his skin color. I guess your standards have "evolved"
    Clarence Thomas was picked for his skin color. This nominee will be picked for her skin color and gender. Sandra Day O’Connor was picked for her gender.

    Your sudden interest in resumes is charmingly naive.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,103
    edited February 2022
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    “Poorly worded”

    Yeah, that’s all it was.

    Of course.

    So you can't tell us why it was "idiotic" Got it.

    You want to take a bet on if Biden's pick will come even close resume wise to the pick Shapiro mentioned Dazzler?

    I seem to recall you mentioning quite a few times that Clarence Thomas was an unimpressive legal lightweight who was picked only because of his skin color. I guess your standards have "evolved"
    Clarence Thomas was picked for his skin color. This nominee will be picked for her skin color and gender. Sandra Day O’Connor was picked for her gender.

    Your sudden interest in resumes is charmingly naive.
    That's a good Kunt, keep dancing. You'd hate to actually back up that worthless twat of a mouth. Appears you believe his statement was "idiotic" for the same reason the Georgetown Coed who now want "free" lunch thinks it was "racist." It made your snatches hurt.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,627
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    “Poorly worded”

    Yeah, that’s all it was.

    Of course.

    So you can't tell us why it was "idiotic" Got it.

    You want to take a bet on if Biden's pick will come even close resume wise to the pick Shapiro mentioned Dazzler?

    I seem to recall you mentioning quite a few times that Clarence Thomas was an unimpressive legal lightweight who was picked only because of his skin color. I guess your standards have "evolved"
    Clarence Thomas was picked for his skin color. This nominee will be picked for her skin color and gender. Sandra Day O’Connor was picked for her gender.

    Your sudden interest in resumes is charmingly naive.
    That's a good Kunt, keep dancing. You'd hate to actually back up that worthless twat of a mouth. Appears you believe his statement was "idiotic" for the same reason the Georgetown Coed who now want "free" lunch thinks it was "racist." It made your snatches hurt.
    Here in 21st Century America, something that “poorly worded” is idiotic. You are shocked! shocked! there was any reaction.

    I am not.

  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,861 Standard Supporter
    edited February 2022



    So Shapiro is a big fat racist because he promoted a race that isn't as oppressed as the race of Biden's supposed nominee?
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,103
    edited February 2022
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    “Poorly worded”

    Yeah, that’s all it was.

    Of course.

    So you can't tell us why it was "idiotic" Got it.

    You want to take a bet on if Biden's pick will come even close resume wise to the pick Shapiro mentioned Dazzler?

    I seem to recall you mentioning quite a few times that Clarence Thomas was an unimpressive legal lightweight who was picked only because of his skin color. I guess your standards have "evolved"
    Clarence Thomas was picked for his skin color. This nominee will be picked for her skin color and gender. Sandra Day O’Connor was picked for her gender.

    Your sudden interest in resumes is charmingly naive.
    That's a good Kunt, keep dancing. You'd hate to actually back up that worthless twat of a mouth. Appears you believe his statement was "idiotic" for the same reason the Georgetown Coed who now want "free" lunch thinks it was "racist." It made your snatches hurt.
    Here in 21st Century America, something that “poorly worded” is idiotic. You are shocked! shocked! there was any reaction.

    I am not.

    I'm about as "shocked" by the reaction as I am that you're dancing like a Kunt refusing to back up your mouth. What he said is nearly 100% accurate despite being poorly worded. You can't now admit that because it goes against your team. So you claim it was "idiotic" while refusing to state why. It's the standard Dazzler the Kunt MO
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,861 Standard Supporter




    So Shapiro is a big fat racist because he promoted a race that isn't as oppressed as the race of Biden's supposed nominee?



    This is so confusing.

    When do the oppression rankings come out?

  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,103
    Dazzler would be agreeing with what Shapiro said if he were talking about a Conservative judge. In fact what Shapiro said is pretty much the way Dazzler has always talked about Clarence Thomas nomination.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,627
    SFGbob said:

    Dazzler would be agreeing with what Shapiro said if he were talking about a Conservative judge. In fact what Shapiro said is pretty much the way Dazzler has always talked about Clarence Thomas nomination.

    Reagan didn’t lie. Said he would pick a woman.

    Biden didn’t lie. Said he would pick a black woman.

    GHWB lied. Said he picked the most qualified person.



  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,103
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Dazzler would be agreeing with what Shapiro said if he were talking about a Conservative judge. In fact what Shapiro said is pretty much the way Dazzler has always talked about Clarence Thomas nomination.

    Reagan didn’t lie. Said he would pick a woman.

    Biden didn’t lie. Said he would pick a black woman.

    GHWB lied. Said he picked the most qualified person.



    So much mouth, and still no answer to why his statement was "idiotic." When you were a young man Dazzler did always aspire to grow-up to be a pathetic Kunt or did it just come to you naturally?
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,103
    edited February 2022
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Dazzler would be agreeing with what Shapiro said if he were talking about a Conservative judge. In fact what Shapiro said is pretty much the way Dazzler has always talked about Clarence Thomas nomination.

    Reagan didn’t lie. Said he would pick a woman.

    Biden didn’t lie. Said he would pick a black woman.

    GHWB lied. Said he picked the most qualified person.



    So what's your problem with Shapiro's statement? Biden is picking a "lesser" black woman. You should be applauding his candor.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,627
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Dazzler would be agreeing with what Shapiro said if he were talking about a Conservative judge. In fact what Shapiro said is pretty much the way Dazzler has always talked about Clarence Thomas nomination.

    Reagan didn’t lie. Said he would pick a woman.

    Biden didn’t lie. Said he would pick a black woman.

    GHWB lied. Said he picked the most qualified person.



    So much mouth, and still no answer to why his statement was "idiotic." When you were a young man Dazzler did always aspire to grow-up to be a pathetic Kunt or did it just come to you naturally?
    Obtuse blob is the best blob.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,103
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Dazzler would be agreeing with what Shapiro said if he were talking about a Conservative judge. In fact what Shapiro said is pretty much the way Dazzler has always talked about Clarence Thomas nomination.

    Reagan didn’t lie. Said he would pick a woman.

    Biden didn’t lie. Said he would pick a black woman.

    GHWB lied. Said he picked the most qualified person.



    So much mouth, and still no answer to why his statement was "idiotic." When you were a young man Dazzler did always aspire to grow-up to be a pathetic Kunt or did it just come to you naturally?
    Obtuse blob is the best blob.
    Kunt Dazzler is unfortunately, the only Dazzler. You've all but agreed with Shapiro's statement Dazzler, Biden is picking a "lesser" black woman.
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,729 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Dazzler would be agreeing with what Shapiro said if he were talking about a Conservative judge. In fact what Shapiro said is pretty much the way Dazzler has always talked about Clarence Thomas nomination.

    Reagan didn’t lie. Said he would pick a woman.

    Biden didn’t lie. Said he would pick a black woman.

    GHWB lied. Said he picked the most qualified person.



    Thomas was the most qualified person. He and Scalia were the two top minds for decades on the Supreme Court. Now it is just Thomas as the the top justice. Thomas makes the wise Latina look like a Sotomayor who thinks that a fireman's exam was inherently racist because black were failing it at a higher rate than whites. That higher knowledge just can't be taught. You need to read the entrails of the Constitution for the penumbras and emanations that are override the actual words of the Constitution.

    Reagan phucked up when he picked O'Connor who had difficulty reading the 14th amendment.
Sign In or Register to comment.