Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Biden's Nearly 2M Mail-In Pennsylvania Votes in 2020 Would Now Be 'Unconstitutional'

Comments

  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,710 Founders Club
    We said it at the time

    And not just Pennsylvania

    No one cares Trump lost and things are great

    Now just make sure he can't run again because everyone hates him

    Science

    His voters all died to hurt Biden

  • Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,928 Swaye's Wigwam
    I was told this had been all settled in the courts, gone through audits and that 90% of the country had moved on.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,473 Standard Supporter
    Hey Penn. had 200K more mail in ballots turned in than they sent out. Nothing to see!
  • MelloDawgMelloDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 6,758 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited January 2022
    Sledog said:

    Hey Penn. had 200K more mail in ballots turned in than they sent out. Nothing to see!

    Sounds like a slam dunk lawsuit to me. Or is it a homerun?
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    So the trucker that reported driving a trailer load of 288K completed ballots from NJ to PA and then reported that it disappeared, wasn’t some nut.
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,726 Standard Supporter
    Bob_C said:

    I was told this had been all settled in the courts, gone through audits and that 90% of the country had moved on.

    The fix was in. That POS Roberts first ruled that the plaintiff's alleging the state unconstitutional change to mail in voting before the election had no standing. After the election, Roberts and the SC ruled that the issue was moot. The SC never settled anything, they just punted on first down.
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967

    Bob_C said:

    I was told this had been all settled in the courts, gone through audits and that 90% of the country had moved on.

    The fix was in. That POS Roberts first ruled that the plaintiff's alleging the state unconstitutional change to mail in voting before the election had no standing. After the election, Roberts and the SC ruled that the issue was moot. The SC never settled anything, they just punted on first down.
    Pics in play.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,473 Standard Supporter

    Bob_C said:

    I was told this had been all settled in the courts, gone through audits and that 90% of the country had moved on.

    The fix was in. That POS Roberts first ruled that the plaintiff's alleging the state unconstitutional change to mail in voting before the election had no standing. After the election, Roberts and the SC ruled that the issue was moot. The SC never settled anything, they just punted on first down.
    There wasn't a voter whose name they could have used for the case? Seems doubtful....
Sign In or Register to comment.