Sporting News Ranks Pac12 Coaches...

CokeGreaterThanPepsi

http://www.sportingnews.com/ncaa-football/story/2014-04-15/pac-12-coach-rankings-david-shaw-mark-helfrich-chris-petersen-jim-mora-rodriguez?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter


Spoiler Alert: Chris Peterman #1.... Dude, Brah #7

DeepSeaZ

Leach is better than Mora and Graham?

no_uh

DeepSeaZ said:

Leach is better than Mora and Graham?

You think you know better than Sporting News?

SteveInShelton

Sark is only 7 because of Owen12, lol.

[Deleted User]

All I know is MacIntyre better be ahead of Sark. All those MacIntyre "fans" came out in support on that one pole.

[Deleted User]

Doesn’t get nearly enough credit for completely overhauling what he walked into at Washington in 2009. The numbers aren’t mind-blowing (34-29 record), but the program was rock bottom after Ty Willingham gave up his last two years on the job. Now Sarkisian moves to a top five job with the best recruiting base in the nation. Now he’s expected to win big.

CHRIST! I didn't know Kim Grinolds wrote this piece. This reads like something one of us would have wrote when we parody a Doog.

CuntWaffle

Leach is ahead of Mora and Graham? Get the fuck out of here lol.

puppylove_sugarsteel

How do you rank coaches before a game is played? Sark will win the south regularly...what then? Not this year, but in two years Sark will own the South yearly, and Mora will be coaching the Jets

topdawgnc

a team that had proven last season that it could play with both Oregon and Stanford.

I think they misspelled: could play both Oregon and Stanford back to back.

dnc

SteveInShelton said:

Sark is only 7 because of Owen12, lol.

Either that or someone at TSN knows the legend of 7 win Steve.

CuntWaffle

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

How do you rank coaches before a game is played? Sark will win the south regularly...what then? Not this year, but in two years Sark will own the South yearly, and Mora will be coaching the Jets

I won't believe it until SportsBoner reports it. Sorry puppy.

RoadDawg55

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

How do you rank coaches before a game is played? Sark will win the south regularly...what then? Not this year, but in two years Sark will own the South yearly, and Mora will be coaching the Jets

He might (I doubt it) win a South Title or 2 if he lasts 5 years, but he's never going to be consistent enough to frequently win them. I doubt he ever takes USC to a Rose Bowl.

[Deleted User]

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

How do you rank coaches before a game is played? Sark will win the south regularly...what then? Not this year, but in two years Sark will own the South yearly, and Mora will be coaching the Jets

Why you do constantly post shit that belongs on Doogman yet always are the first one to tell others to go to Doogman?

Meek

so we've now got multiple national sports publications ranking Petersen way the fuck above Sark on all poles? The fact that Sark constantly ranks "7" is fucking gold Jerry.

MikeDamone

Anyone with half a brain and a computer knows sark is in the bottom half of the league.

puppylove_sugarsteel

"Washington isn't there yet"? Same number of returning starters as FSU last year, and a RS sophomore qb (Miley Cyrus) and why then isn't UW capable of winning a title. If UW resided in an east - coast conference or the SEC, Petersen and UW would be talked about a little differently, possibly a title contender.

If Petersen took the U $ C job, they'd be a title contender right now going into '14. That's how the playoff committee will view Washington, and why it will be a fucking miracle for UW to get into the playoff. We will see 2 SEC schools in the playoff before a 1 - loss, conference champion uw team. Cook that shit motherfuckees.

Listen buttslappers, UW could win the Pac12 and get left out of playoff. It's likely to happen as Slive got his wish to prevent conference champs from garnering an automatic seat in playoff. The most corrupt thing I've seen happen to college football since 1998 .(you don't know what I'm talking about more_weiner as you were still watching husky games with your daddy then) but u sure know about husky football during that time period:) You know who Slive is corn sorter? What I thought! You will next year, and every year to come until we reach an 8-team playoff.

PurpleJ

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

"Washington isn't there yet"? Same number of returning starters as FSU last year, and a RS sophomore qb (Miley Cyrus) and why then isn't UW capable of winning a title. If UW resided in an east - coast conference or the SEC, Petersen and UW would be talked about a little differently, possibly a title contender.

If Petersen took the U $ C job, they'd be a title contender right now going into '14. That's how the playoff committee will view Washington, and why it will be a fucking miracle for UW to get into the playoff. We will see 2 SEC schools in the playoff before a 1 - loss, conference champion uw team. Cook that shit motherfuckees.

Listen buttslappers, UW could win the Pac12 and get left out of playoff. It's likely to happen as Slive got his wish to prevent conference champs from garnering an automatic seat in playoff. The most corrupt thing I've seen happen to college football since 1998 .(you don't know what I'm talking about more_weiner as you were still watching husky games with your daddy then) but u sure know about husky football during that time period:) You know who Slive is corn sorter? What I thought! You will next year, and every year to come until we reach an 8-team playoff.

If the SEC gets two teams in the playoff, they probably deserved it. Hell, I'm looking forward to the first all-SEC playoff. Should be some great defense.

[Deleted User]

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

"Washington isn't there yet"? Same number of returning starters as FSU last year, and a RS sophomore qb (Miley Cyrus) and why then isn't UW capable of winning a title. If UW resided in an east - coast conference or the SEC, Petersen and UW would be talked about a little differently, possibly a title contender.

If Petersen took the U $ C job, they'd be a title contender right now going into '14. That's how the playoff committee will view Washington, and why it will be a fucking miracle for UW to get into the playoff. We will see 2 SEC schools in the playoff before a 1 - loss, conference champion uw team. Cook that shit motherfuckees.

Listen buttslappers, UW could win the Pac12 and get left out of playoff. It's likely to happen as Slive got his wish to prevent conference champs from garnering an automatic seat in playoff. The most corrupt thing I've seen happen to college football since 1998 .(you don't know what I'm talking about more_weiner as you were still watching husky games with your daddy then) but u sure know about husky football during that time period:) You know who Slive is corn sorter? What I thought! You will next year, and every year to come until we reach an 8-team playoff.

Nice rant but you are also the same dumb fuck who said we shouldn't expect more than 7 wins next year so why so concerned about a national title?

Also a Pac-12 champ could be left out if they don't deserve it. Would Stanford in 1999 deserve a bid in the Final Four? How about Oregon in 1994? Of course not.

The goal is to get the four best teams so having conference champs get an automatic bid is PLSSFS type of thinking.

You've been off your game for a solid month straight. I suggest telling your doc to give you the meds that you were taking in February when you had this place dialed in.

RaccoonHarry

After watching Shaw's play calling in the Rose Bowl, AND his play calling in the Orange Bowl with Luck as his QB, he's rated too high.

I am glad to see Mediocre Mike Riley at #9. Nice guy and all but his teams have NEVER LOST FEWER THAN 4 GAMES IN A SEASON. It's not like OSU never has talent - some of those years the Beavers have had a lot of guys drafted. Some coach ratings have him as high as #2 in the Pac-12, which I find absurd.

PurpleJ

As far as the article goes, I stopped reading at #3.

pawz

PurpleJ said:

As far as the article goes, I stopped reading at #3.

Who is #3? Does #3 poast here?