Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

DAWGS on the SI cover

RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 108,646 Founders Club
in Hardcore Husky Board

· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,598 Founders Club
    A little surprised it took Georgia this long to break through. They are one of the only teams in the nation that "looks" like Bama every year. Just stacked.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 108,646 Founders Club
    Swaye said:

    A little surprised it took Georgia this long to break through. They are one of the only teams in the nation that "looks" like Bama every year. Just stacked.

    They had a well documented Bama problem

    Due to return next season
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 36,443 Founders Club
    They should have had a best of 3 series. My money would have been on Bammer.

    If we're gonna do repeats, let's, at least, make it fair.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,541
    YellowSnow said:

    They should have had a best of 3 series. My money would have been on Bammer.

    If we're gonna do repeats, let's, at least, make it fair.

    That’s why the NFL and CFB playoffs are the best in sports. Series are bullshit. All sports should be one and done.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HouhuskyHouhusky Member Posts: 5,537
    YellowSnow said:

    They should have had a best of 3 series. My money would have been on Bammer.

    If we're gonna do repeats, let's, at least, make it fair.

    I think they should just upload all the AWS next gen stats into the latest Madden and run the simulation 1,000 times to determine the winner, that way none of the guys have to play in a pointless and potentially dangerous amateur college game right before the draft.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 108,646 Founders Club
    Bama and Georgia were the two best teams

    Deal with it

    The NY bowls with a plus one would eliminate that because the SEC champ gets the Sugar Bowl and Georgia would have been in the Citrus Bowl which you can't spell with out UT

    Michigan would have played Utah
    Baylor would have played Pittsburgh in the Orange
    Cinnci would have got an at large to the Cotton to play someone
    Bama would have played someone in the Sugar - maybe Ohio State
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    Bama wins that game with their two top WR’s easily. Saban knew it which is why he didn’t blow his top and was full of praise for his guys in defeat.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    RaceBannon said:

    Bama and Georgia were the two best teams

    Deal with it

    The NY bowls with a plus one would eliminate that because the SEC champ gets the Sugar Bowl and Georgia would have been in the Citrus Bowl which you can't spell with out UT

    Michigan would have played Utah
    Baylor would have played Pittsburgh in the Orange
    Cinnci would have got an at large to the Cotton to play someone
    Bama would have played someone in the Sugar - maybe Ohio State

    I’m ok with that.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CanadawgCanadawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,120 Swaye's Wigwam
    YellowSnow said:

    They should have had a best of 3 series. My money would have been on Bammer.

    If we're gonna do repeats, let's, at least, make it fair.

    Could potentially get that in the Big12 one year. Okst and Oklahoma could play reg season then in the CCG both ending the season 11-1.

    Notice I did not include Texas in this hypothetical
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 36,443 Founders Club
    RaceBannon said:

    Bama and Georgia were the two best teams

    Deal with it

    The NY bowls with a plus one would eliminate that because the SEC champ gets the Sugar Bowl and Georgia would have been in the Citrus Bowl which you can't spell with out UT

    Michigan would have played Utah
    Baylor would have played Pittsburgh in the Orange
    Cinnci would have got an at large to the Cotton to play someone
    Bama would have played someone in the Sugar - maybe Ohio State

    I would have been fine with Michigan and Bammer splitting the Natty or playing two weeks later in the @Crow_T_Robot Cherry Bowl.

    It neither here nor there and I've accepted it for what it is. But still, even though I'm a few years your Junior, Race, it's possible I'm even more of a traditionalist / get off my lawn, old at heart type. I hate change.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 108,646 Founders Club
    I was against the BCS and approved of the Pac 10 and Big 10 staying out. Michigan got a natty out of that decision

    But the kids wanted to IMPROVE college football so what are you going to do?

    The Pac 12 is also an abomination

    PAC 8 Forever!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HuskyJWHuskyJW Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 15,079 Swaye's Wigwam
    RaceBannon said:


    I know you are being sarcastic but those are the Oregon Ducks
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,598 Founders Club
    46XiJCAB said:

    Bama wins that game with their two top WR’s easily. Saban knew it which is why he didn’t blow his top and was full of praise for his guys in defeat.


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BonedogBonedog Member Posts: 650

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • whlinderwhlinder Member Posts: 5,051 Standard Supporter
    Swaye said:

    A little surprised it took Georgia this long to break through. They are one of the only teams in the nation that "looks" like Bama every year. Just stacked.

    It’s wild Georgia hadn’t won a natty since 1980. Our Dawgs with a looser AD and admin have 11 years before we match their drought.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,598 Founders Club
    whlinder said:

    Swaye said:

    A little surprised it took Georgia this long to break through. They are one of the only teams in the nation that "looks" like Bama every year. Just stacked.

    It’s wild Georgia hadn’t won a natty since 1980. Our Dawgs with a looser AD and admin have 11 years before we match their drought.
    Yep but they have had some very successful squads in there. Couple more in the 80's, early 2000's, and then of course 2012 and 2017 (Alabama derailed both of those). Very very close (like our 1990 UCLA season) a number of times. Great great program but yeah, 41 years in between. Crazy when you think how good they seem almost every year (going back over 20 years).
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TXDawgTXDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 847 Founders Club
    Swaye said:

    A little surprised it took Georgia this long to break through. They are one of the only teams in the nation that "looks" like Bama every year. Just stacked.

    It shows that with the right HC and supportive boosters/administration, someone can build a rival to Alabama.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 108,646 Founders Club
    TXDawg said:

    Swaye said:

    A little surprised it took Georgia this long to break through. They are one of the only teams in the nation that "looks" like Bama every year. Just stacked.

    It shows that with the right HC and supportive boosters/administration, someone can build a rival to Alabama.
    Clemson has two title game wins over Bama
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.