Kim Grinolds Quote of the Century
Comments
-
"what's said at the dub pub, stays at the dub pub"
hahahaha -
If you want to call an 18 year old kid an idiot that's fine but if you bash on an adult who makes millions you'll be gone. No warning . Done.
-
The hypocrisy is astounding.He_Needs_More_Time said:If you want to call an 18 year old kid an idiot that's fine but if you bash on an adult who makes millions you'll be gone. No warning . Done.
Kim definitely seems to be "burning bridges" superiority guy
-
Kim is the biggest hypocritical cunt out there. He's also a dumb fuck which is a bad combo.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
The hypocrisy is astounding.He_Needs_More_Time said:If you want to call an 18 year old kid an idiot that's fine but if you bash on an adult who makes millions you'll be gone. No warning . Done.
Kim definitely seems to be "burning bridges" superiority guy
Has no problems shitting on the players but if you second guess a coach making millions that's over the line.
It's funny how everything he used to bash Roof for he's turned exactly into. -
But James never had to play a ranked Oregon State. Apples to oranges.He_Needs_More_Time said:Those shitheads used to tear down Don James to prop up Sark. Pretend James wasn't that good either. That's how fucking low and desperate they were to prop up Sark.
Act like the Pac-8/10 was a total joke when I did the research to show it's just as tough as it was today. Act like year five of Sark is equal to James year five. Constantly bring up James 1985-1988 stretch.
Like I said in another thread Kim is just too much of a fucktard to realize how big of a hypocrite he is.
-
Comparing him to James just shows they're desperate. During James' mediocre '85-'89 stretch he was 36-21-2. That's still way better than 34-29. Of course if you cherry picked '84 and the early 90s, he's 41-6 w/ four now BCS bowels, three wins a NC, no.2 ranking, and a top 5 ranking. Doogs are really fucking stupid.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
The other thing about James is that at Kent St he won the conference which was the only time they won it until 2012. His next season according to SRS was the best in program history. 9 wins and missed the league title by one game.He_Needs_More_Time said:Those shitheads used to tear down Don James to prop up Sark. Pretend James wasn't that good either. That's how fucking low and desperate they were to prop up Sark.
Act like the Pac-8/10 was a total joke when I did the research to show it's just as tough as it was today. Act like year five of Sark is equal to James year five. Constantly bring up James 1985-1988 stretch.
Like I said in another thread Kim is just too much of a fucktard to realize how big of a hypocrite he is.
So he had a legitimate track record that suggested he could be a very good coach at a big school. Sark only was a OC for 2 years before being a HC. He had no track record of even being a good coordinator. And btw, James was 20-9 his first four years in conference play while Sark was 19-17.
Just mind boggling how fucktarded these doogs are. -
It's threads like these that make me proud to be a part of the Bored of Investors and a moderator of Hardcore Husky.
It's like watching your son hit his first home run. Nothing but tears of happiness. -
I always brought that up that during James WORST years they were still better than Sark's five year stretch.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Comparing him to James just shows they're desperate. During James' mediocre '85-'89 stretch he was 36-21-2. That's still way better than 34-29. Of course if you cherry picked '84 and the early 90s, he's 41-6 w/ four now BCS bowels, three wins a NC, no.2 ranking, and a top 5 ranking. Doogs are really fucking stupid.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
The other thing about James is that at Kent St he won the conference which was the only time they won it until 2012. His next season according to SRS was the best in program history. 9 wins and missed the league title by one game.He_Needs_More_Time said:Those shitheads used to tear down Don James to prop up Sark. Pretend James wasn't that good either. That's how fucking low and desperate they were to prop up Sark.
Act like the Pac-8/10 was a total joke when I did the research to show it's just as tough as it was today. Act like year five of Sark is equal to James year five. Constantly bring up James 1985-1988 stretch.
Like I said in another thread Kim is just too much of a fucktard to realize how big of a hypocrite he is.
So he had a legitimate track record that suggested he could be a very good coach at a big school. Sark only was a OC for 2 years before being a HC. He had no track record of even being a good coordinator. And btw, James was 20-9 his first four years in conference play while Sark was 19-17.
Just mind boggling how fucktarded these doogs are.
I thought that was the worst though when they had no problem bashing on James to prop up Sark. Pathetic. -
Not my work. It was on dawgboard several months ago. I can't remember who got all the screen shots they needed.phineas said:
It truly does not get much better than this. Thanks, damoneMikeDamone said:From Dawgboard (RIP)
-
So the worst year under James was 1988 ... 6-5. I don't fall under the crowd of moral victories, but there's a huge difference in losing a game competitively versus spending the second half with a plunger sticking out of your ass.
The losses in 1988:
vs. #2 UCLA: 24-17
@ #3 USC 28-27
@ Oregon 17-14
vs. Arizona (7-4) 16-13
@ Washington St (9-3) 32-31
Now, you could get critical of losing the games to Oregon, Arizona, and the Cougs ... but the bottom line was that the 5 losses were by a grand total of 15 points. It was a team that spent the entire year playing close games and they won some and lost some. But at no point was there anything there that made you think "we've got to blow this up." -
Kim always said, "A win is a win. A loss is a loss." It's as fucking stupid as guys who say pussy is pussy. No dumbass, it's not. There is a difference between a hot chick and a 300 pounders pussy.Tequilla said:So the worst year under James was 1988 ... 6-5. I don't fall under the crowd of moral victories, but there's a huge difference in losing a game competitively versus spending the second half with a plunger sticking out of your ass.
The losses in 1988:
vs. #2 UCLA: 24-17
@ #3 USC 28-27
@ Oregon 17-14
vs. Arizona (7-4) 16-13
@ Washington St (9-3) 32-31
Now, you could get critical of losing the games to Oregon, Arizona, and the Cougs ... but the bottom line was that the 5 losses were by a grand total of 15 points. It was a team that spent the entire year playing close games and they won some and lost some. But at no point was there anything there that made you think "we've got to blow this up."
"A win is a win" makes sense if we were competing for titles. When you are an average to above average team, it matters. Everyone would have felt better losing 28-24 against LSU than 41-3.
-
Pics?RoadDawg55 said:
Kim always said, "A win is a win. A loss is a loss." It's as fucking stupid as guys who say pussy is pussy. No dumbass, it's not. There is a difference between a hot chick and a 300 pounders pussy.Tequilla said:So the worst year under James was 1988 ... 6-5. I don't fall under the crowd of moral victories, but there's a huge difference in losing a game competitively versus spending the second half with a plunger sticking out of your ass.
The losses in 1988:
vs. #2 UCLA: 24-17
@ #3 USC 28-27
@ Oregon 17-14
vs. Arizona (7-4) 16-13
@ Washington St (9-3) 32-31
Now, you could get critical of losing the games to Oregon, Arizona, and the Cougs ... but the bottom line was that the 5 losses were by a grand total of 15 points. It was a team that spent the entire year playing close games and they won some and lost some. But at no point was there anything there that made you think "we've got to blow this up."
"A win is a win" makes sense if we were competing for titles. When you are an average to above average team, it matters. Everyone would have felt better losing 28-24 against LSU than 41-3. -
Type in bbw on findtubes.com.Dardanus said:
Pics?RoadDawg55 said:
Kim always said, "A win is a win. A loss is a loss." It's as fucking stupid as guys who say pussy is pussy. No dumbass, it's not. There is a difference between a hot chick and a 300 pounders pussy.Tequilla said:So the worst year under James was 1988 ... 6-5. I don't fall under the crowd of moral victories, but there's a huge difference in losing a game competitively versus spending the second half with a plunger sticking out of your ass.
The losses in 1988:
vs. #2 UCLA: 24-17
@ #3 USC 28-27
@ Oregon 17-14
vs. Arizona (7-4) 16-13
@ Washington St (9-3) 32-31
Now, you could get critical of losing the games to Oregon, Arizona, and the Cougs ... but the bottom line was that the 5 losses were by a grand total of 15 points. It was a team that spent the entire year playing close games and they won some and lost some. But at no point was there anything there that made you think "we've got to blow this up."
"A win is a win" makes sense if we were competing for titles. When you are an average to above average team, it matters. Everyone would have felt better losing 28-24 against LSU than 41-3. -
RIP, MickDardanus said:
Pics?RoadDawg55 said:
Kim always said, "A win is a win. A loss is a loss." It's as fucking stupid as guys who say pussy is pussy. No dumbass, it's not. There is a difference between a hot chick and a 300 pounders pussy.Tequilla said:So the worst year under James was 1988 ... 6-5. I don't fall under the crowd of moral victories, but there's a huge difference in losing a game competitively versus spending the second half with a plunger sticking out of your ass.
The losses in 1988:
vs. #2 UCLA: 24-17
@ #3 USC 28-27
@ Oregon 17-14
vs. Arizona (7-4) 16-13
@ Washington St (9-3) 32-31
Now, you could get critical of losing the games to Oregon, Arizona, and the Cougs ... but the bottom line was that the 5 losses were by a grand total of 15 points. It was a team that spent the entire year playing close games and they won some and lost some. But at no point was there anything there that made you think "we've got to blow this up."
"A win is a win" makes sense if we were competing for titles. When you are an average to above average team, it matters. Everyone would have felt better losing 28-24 against LSU than 41-3.
-
DisagreeRoadDawg55 said:
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
