The brb...blonde shit amuses the hell out of me. Little shit turd of a guy acting like he is a chick magnet. Let's run down the list:
Looks: Like a monkeys ass Money: Barely enough to keep his faggot life partner in nachos and extra cheese Career: Are you fucking kidding me? Dick: Hasn't seen it since the Clinton Administration
Yeah, this guy is clearly pulling all kinds of trim.
Those shitheads used to tear down Don James to prop up Sark. Pretend James wasn't that good either. That's how fucking low and desperate they were to prop up Sark.
Act like the Pac-8/10 was a total joke when I did the research to show it's just as tough as it was today. Act like year five of Sark is equal to James year five. Constantly bring up James 1985-1988 stretch.
Like I said in another thread Kim is just too much of a fucktard to realize how big of a hypocrite he is.
The other thing about James is that at Kent St he won the conference which was the only time they won it until 2012. His next season according to SRS was the best in program history. 9 wins and missed the league title by one game.
So he had a legitimate track record that suggested he could be a very good coach at a big school. Sark only was a OC for 2 years before being a HC. He had no track record of even being a good coordinator. And btw, James was 20-9 his first four years in conference play while Sark was 19-17.
Just mind boggling how fucktarded these doogs are.
Those shitheads used to tear down Don James to prop up Sark. Pretend James wasn't that good either. That's how fucking low and desperate they were to prop up Sark.
Act like the Pac-8/10 was a total joke when I did the research to show it's just as tough as it was today. Act like year five of Sark is equal to James year five. Constantly bring up James 1985-1988 stretch.
Like I said in another thread Kim is just too much of a fucktard to realize how big of a hypocrite he is.
The other thing about James is that at Kent St he won the conference which was the only time they won it until 2012. His next season according to SRS was the best in program history. 9 wins and missed the league title by one game.
So he had a legitimate track record that suggested he could be a very good coach at a big school. Sark only was a OC for 2 years before being a HC. He had no track record of even being a good coordinator. And btw, James was 20-9 his first four years in conference play while Sark was 19-17.
Just mind boggling how fucktarded these doogs are.
Doogs hate facts though. They would say shit like
year 1: 6 year 2: 5 year 3: 7 year 4: 7
year 1: 5 year 2: 7 year 3: 7 year 4: 7
The first coach is Don James regular season wins, the second is Sark's regular season wins. Yet these Nega's want to fire Sark? ROFL!
They'd ignore shit like conference record, how James never played dreckfest Big Sky Schools, how James won a fucking Rose Bowl, how he coached in less fucking games.
Those shitheads used to tear down Don James to prop up Sark. Pretend James wasn't that good either. That's how fucking low and desperate they were to prop up Sark.
Act like the Pac-8/10 was a total joke when I did the research to show it's just as tough as it was today. Act like year five of Sark is equal to James year five. Constantly bring up James 1985-1988 stretch.
Like I said in another thread Kim is just too much of a fucktard to realize how big of a hypocrite he is.
The other thing about James is that at Kent St he won the conference which was the only time they won it until 2012. His next season according to SRS was the best in program history. 9 wins and missed the league title by one game.
So he had a legitimate track record that suggested he could be a very good coach at a big school. Sark only was a OC for 2 years before being a HC. He had no track record of even being a good coordinator. And btw, James was 20-9 his first four years in conference play while Sark was 19-17.
Just mind boggling how fucktarded these doogs are.
Doogs hate facts though. They would say shit like
year 1: 6 year 2: 5 year 3: 7 year 4: 7
year 1: 5 year 2: 7 year 3: 7 year 4: 7
The first coach is Don James regular season wins, the second is Sark's regular season wins. Yet these Nega's want to fire Sark? ROFL!
They'd ignore shit like conference record, how James never played dreckfest Big Sky Schools, how James won a fucking Rose Bowl, how he coached in less fucking games.
I think the reason Kim says, "This stays in chat" is because he blatantly makes stuff up for his customers and knows he will be mocked by everyone outside of doogman. He's so full of shit.
Those shitheads used to tear down Don James to prop up Sark. Pretend James wasn't that good either. That's how fucking low and desperate they were to prop up Sark.
Act like the Pac-8/10 was a total joke when I did the research to show it's just as tough as it was today. Act like year five of Sark is equal to James year five. Constantly bring up James 1985-1988 stretch.
Like I said in another thread Kim is just too much of a fucktard to realize how big of a hypocrite he is.
But James never had to play a ranked Oregon State. Apples to oranges.
Those shitheads used to tear down Don James to prop up Sark. Pretend James wasn't that good either. That's how fucking low and desperate they were to prop up Sark.
Act like the Pac-8/10 was a total joke when I did the research to show it's just as tough as it was today. Act like year five of Sark is equal to James year five. Constantly bring up James 1985-1988 stretch.
Like I said in another thread Kim is just too much of a fucktard to realize how big of a hypocrite he is.
The other thing about James is that at Kent St he won the conference which was the only time they won it until 2012. His next season according to SRS was the best in program history. 9 wins and missed the league title by one game.
So he had a legitimate track record that suggested he could be a very good coach at a big school. Sark only was a OC for 2 years before being a HC. He had no track record of even being a good coordinator. And btw, James was 20-9 his first four years in conference play while Sark was 19-17.
Just mind boggling how fucktarded these doogs are.
Comparing him to James just shows they're desperate. During James' mediocre '85-'89 stretch he was 36-21-2. That's still way better than 34-29. Of course if you cherry picked '84 and the early 90s, he's 41-6 w/ four now BCS bowels, three wins a NC, no.2 ranking, and a top 5 ranking. Doogs are really fucking stupid.
Those shitheads used to tear down Don James to prop up Sark. Pretend James wasn't that good either. That's how fucking low and desperate they were to prop up Sark.
Act like the Pac-8/10 was a total joke when I did the research to show it's just as tough as it was today. Act like year five of Sark is equal to James year five. Constantly bring up James 1985-1988 stretch.
Like I said in another thread Kim is just too much of a fucktard to realize how big of a hypocrite he is.
The other thing about James is that at Kent St he won the conference which was the only time they won it until 2012. His next season according to SRS was the best in program history. 9 wins and missed the league title by one game.
So he had a legitimate track record that suggested he could be a very good coach at a big school. Sark only was a OC for 2 years before being a HC. He had no track record of even being a good coordinator. And btw, James was 20-9 his first four years in conference play while Sark was 19-17.
Just mind boggling how fucktarded these doogs are.
Comparing him to James just shows they're desperate. During James' mediocre '85-'89 stretch he was 36-21-2. That's still way better than 34-29. Of course if you cherry picked '84 and the early 90s, he's 41-6 w/ four now BCS bowels, three wins a NC, no.2 ranking, and a top 5 ranking. Doogs are really fucking stupid.
I always brought that up that during James WORST years they were still better than Sark's five year stretch.
I thought that was the worst though when they had no problem bashing on James to prop up Sark. Pathetic.
So the worst year under James was 1988 ... 6-5. I don't fall under the crowd of moral victories, but there's a huge difference in losing a game competitively versus spending the second half with a plunger sticking out of your ass.
The losses in 1988:
vs. #2 UCLA: 24-17 @ #3 USC 28-27 @ Oregon 17-14 vs. Arizona (7-4) 16-13 @ Washington St (9-3) 32-31
Now, you could get critical of losing the games to Oregon, Arizona, and the Cougs ... but the bottom line was that the 5 losses were by a grand total of 15 points. It was a team that spent the entire year playing close games and they won some and lost some. But at no point was there anything there that made you think "we've got to blow this up."
Comments
Looks: Like a monkeys ass
Money: Barely enough to keep his faggot life partner in nachos and extra cheese
Career: Are you fucking kidding me?
Dick: Hasn't seen it since the Clinton Administration
Yeah, this guy is clearly pulling all kinds of trim.
So he had a legitimate track record that suggested he could be a very good coach at a big school. Sark only was a OC for 2 years before being a HC. He had no track record of even being a good coordinator. And btw, James was 20-9 his first four years in conference play while Sark was 19-17.
Just mind boggling how fucktarded these doogs are.
Wheelhouse!
year 1: 6
year 2: 5
year 3: 7
year 4: 7
year 1: 5
year 2: 7
year 3: 7
year 4: 7
The first coach is Don James regular season wins, the second is Sark's regular season wins. Yet these Nega's want to fire Sark? ROFL!
They'd ignore shit like conference record, how James never played dreckfest Big Sky Schools, how James won a fucking Rose Bowl, how he coached in less fucking games.
hahahaha
Kim definitely seems to be "burning bridges" superiority guy
Has no problems shitting on the players but if you second guess a coach making millions that's over the line.
It's funny how everything he used to bash Roof for he's turned exactly into.
It's like watching your son hit his first home run. Nothing but tears of happiness.
I thought that was the worst though when they had no problem bashing on James to prop up Sark. Pathetic.
The losses in 1988:
vs. #2 UCLA: 24-17
@ #3 USC 28-27
@ Oregon 17-14
vs. Arizona (7-4) 16-13
@ Washington St (9-3) 32-31
Now, you could get critical of losing the games to Oregon, Arizona, and the Cougs ... but the bottom line was that the 5 losses were by a grand total of 15 points. It was a team that spent the entire year playing close games and they won some and lost some. But at no point was there anything there that made you think "we've got to blow this up."