If we're using the selective stats bitching approach, does this mean you prefer the guy who is 0-5 against his in-state rival?
I have no preference. I just want a coach who is proven to be a good recruiter at the p5 level. Enough of this Mickey mouse well we coach guys better bullshit.
They way things are starting to break, from my perspective, DeBoer is a great option. Much of this is a total crapshoot... Steve Spurrier never killed it at South Carolina ... however he was decent. I would have thought he would have been in contention every year in the SEC.
Jonathon Smith has worked out well at OSU with no head coaching experience... once the 'sure things' are off the board (or at least those who look like they are sure things), you have to move on who you think can be successful given the situation. Smith was/is hungry... that is the most important ingredient... and I believe DeBoer is hungry as well.
Imagine going scorched earth on the forums for fucking Hafley, lol.
Either DeBoer or Hafley are a roll of the dice. DeBoer has a little more of a track record of success but either way we apparently couldn’t compete with the big kids.
Imagine going scorched earth on the forums for fucking Hafley, lol.
Either DeBoer or Hafley are a roll of the dice. DeBoer has a little more of a track record of success but either way we apparently couldn’t compete with the big kids.
Yeah. Hafley has proven to be an excellent recruiter. I’d rather roll the dice with that.
Imagine going scorched earth on the forums for fucking Hafley, lol.
Either DeBoer or Hafley are a roll of the dice. DeBoer has a little more of a track record of success but either way we apparently couldn’t compete with the big kids.
Yeah. Hafley has proven to be an excellent recruiter. I’d rather roll the dice with that.
I think the point is he hasn’t done jack shit. Big chance. Just seems overly dramatic for situation whether or not you like deboner
Imagine going scorched earth on the forums for fucking Hafley, lol.
Either DeBoer or Hafley are a roll of the dice. DeBoer has a little more of a track record of success but either way we apparently couldn’t compete with the big kids.
Yeah. Hafley has proven to be an excellent recruiter. I’d rather roll the dice with that.
I think the point is he hasn’t done jack shit. Big chance. Just seems overly dramatic for situation whether or not you like deboner
He has a top 25 class at fucking Boston College in year 2...
The overriding truth is WeAreAFatLesboSchool. It’s cute you guys think anything dramatic is going to change. Lakes W/L record had nothing to do with firing him. It wasn’t an issue.
Imagine going scorched earth on the forums for fucking Hafley, lol.
Either DeBoer or Hafley are a roll of the dice. DeBoer has a little more of a track record of success but either way we apparently couldn’t compete with the big kids.
Yeah. Hafley has proven to be an excellent recruiter. I’d rather roll the dice with that.
I think the point is he hasn’t done jack shit. Big chance. Just seems overly dramatic for situation whether or not you like deboner
He has a top 25 class at fucking Boston College in year 2...
Imagine going scorched earth on the forums for fucking Hafley, lol.
Either DeBoer or Hafley are a roll of the dice. DeBoer has a little more of a track record of success but either way we apparently couldn’t compete with the big kids.
Yeah. Hafley has proven to be an excellent recruiter. I’d rather roll the dice with that.
I think the point is he hasn’t done jack shit. Big chance. Just seems overly dramatic for situation whether or not you like deboner
He has a top 25 class at fucking Boston College in year 2...
I would be mildly intrigued by Hafley ... but from where I sit I think DeBoer's credentials are better... but that is just me.
I could be OK with Hafley ... or Clawson ...
I just sense more hunger, a higher ceiling and career carefully built to bring him to this moment... the moment when he takes over a P5 program.
So basically all bullshit reasons based on “feel” for a guy you don't even know.
DeBoer is 9-3 at Fresno, has turned a turnover prone midget into a viable QB, has three natties at a lower level and has had success as an assistant everywhere he has gone. Could I be wrong..? Sure... he might do poorly. He also might thrive ala Don James.
Seriously... I respect your viewpoint but I see differently.
Comments
It’s a crapshoot. Just avoid retreads and demonstrated losers (Wilcox), hire someone that has potential, and LIPO.
Deboner could suck, he could be great.
Serious question...
They way things are starting to break, from my perspective, DeBoer is a great option. Much of this is a total crapshoot... Steve Spurrier never killed it at South Carolina ... however he was decent. I would have thought he would have been in contention every year in the SEC.
Jonathon Smith has worked out well at OSU with no head coaching experience... once the 'sure things' are off the board (or at least those who look like they are sure things), you have to move on who you think can be successful given the situation. Smith was/is hungry... that is the most important ingredient... and I believe DeBoer is hungry as well.
Either DeBoer or Hafley are a roll of the dice. DeBoer has a little more of a track record of success but either way we apparently couldn’t compete with the big kids.
I could be OK with Hafley ... or Clawson ...
I just sense more hunger, a higher ceiling and career carefully built to bring him to this moment... the moment when he takes over a P5 program.
Seems like a good coach but it’s not like he’s flashed urban Meyer potential.
Jimmy Lake had bestarred recruits.
To borrow a phrase - everything matters.
However there is still hope on this hire
Lipo then melt down
Seriously... I respect your viewpoint but I see differently.