Cougs -1
Comments
-
In 2015 UW was 5-6, cuog had just barely missed out on the North missing a fg against Stanford, and UW still ran them over.
They've lost to every team with more talent than them outside of ASU who turned it over like 4 times in a half. This includes aids ridden SC obviously.
Should be a good game and why bet on what's probably going to come down to flukey turnovers. -
Your $5 might become $10!ntxduck said:Someone talk me out of betting the entire account on the cougs
-
This would be a coug it if epic proportions. This is a bad uw team. Probably will be a shit game That ends with wazzu storming the field. -1 is good value still.haie said:In 2015 UW was 5-6, cuog had just barely missed out on the North missing a fg against Stanford, and UW still ran them over.
They've lost to every team with more talent than them outside of ASU who turned it over like 4 times in a half. This includes aids ridden SC obviously.
Should be a good game and why bet on what's probably going to come down to flukey turnovers.
-
This is their one shot
You know they are gonna blow it -
They're 1-3 against more talented teams, one who is worse than UW (SC). ASU was a freakshow, UW isn't going to implode like that 2 games in a row. Their other wins, they beat Beavlet (really) close, and beat Cal down pretty good whereas we got lucky. Stanford who we know is terrible lost to them on the road by a field goal.AtomicDawg said:
This would be a coug it if epic proportions. This is a bad uw team. Probably will be a shit game That ends with wazzu storming the field. -1 is good value still.haie said:In 2015 UW was 5-6, cuog had just barely missed out on the North missing a fg against Stanford, and UW still ran them over.
They've lost to every team with more talent than them outside of ASU who turned it over like 4 times in a half. This includes aids ridden SC obviously.
Should be a good game and why bet on what's probably going to come down to flukey turnovers.
Seems obvious to everyone to just run the ball at UW but it probably comes down to picks from DeLaura vs Huard/Morris. I think they will have to throw the ball a decent amount which they tend to do no matter the opponent. They don't have a White/Charbonnet type of back.
I haven't watched them much but it seems like DeLaura is awesome one game and mostly turnover prone the next. More of a toss-up than it looks because UW has found ways to lose in the end.
Big question is Huard obviously. -
Anyone who thinks we? are winning this one is delusional. We’ve got nothing. Reminds me of the Polish football team who still failed to score following their opponents’ forfeit.
-
-
I'm delusional. I never count on Cuog to do anything for any reason. They are the corporeal embodiment of disappointment. In life generally, that is.SkipBoyd said:Anyone who thinks we? are winning this one is delusional. We’ve got nothing. Reminds me of the Polish football team who still failed to score following their opponents’ forfeit.
-
It’s really a shame Civil War isn’t at 1 on Friday.creepycoug said:
I'm delusional. I never count on Cuog to do anything for any reason. They are the corporeal embodiment of disappointment. In life generally, that is.SkipBoyd said:Anyone who thinks we? are winning this one is delusional. We’ve got nothing. Reminds me of the Polish football team who still failed to score following their opponents’ forfeit.
Beavers win….and then WSU has to beat UW to win the the north.
You know they would blow it -
I think UW takes this and I don't have a good reason why (I have thought they would lose the past few weeks as well).
-
Our team is a contemptible group of losers. But there is nothing more dependable than the cuogs squandering their rare opportunity for success, and they're especially adept at pissing themselves when UW is involved.SkipBoyd said:Anyone who thinks we? are winning this one is delusional. We’ve got nothing. Reminds me of the Polish football team who still failed to score following their opponents’ forfeit.
One of those things has to give. -
Counterpoint: its the cougsSkipBoyd said:Anyone who thinks we? are winning this one is delusional. We’ve got nothing. Reminds me of the Polish football team who still failed to score following their opponents’ forfeit.
-
BTW, this actor's character in Safety Not Guaranteed would be a perfect poster for Hardcore Husky. He'd fit right in.DerekJohnson said: -
Lolhaie said:In 2015 UW was 5-6, cuog had just barely missed out on the North missing a fg against Stanford, and UW still ran them over.
They've lost to every team with more talent than them outside of ASU who turned it over like 4 times in a half. This includes aids ridden SC obviously.
Should be a good game and why bet on what's probably going to come down to flukey turnovers. -
Jfchaie said:
They're 1-3 against more talented teams, one who is worse than UW (SC). ASU was a freakshow, UW isn't going to implode like that 2 games in a row. Their other wins, they beat Beavlet (really) close, and beat Cal down pretty good whereas we got lucky. Stanford who we know is terrible lost to them on the road by a field goal.AtomicDawg said:
This would be a coug it if epic proportions. This is a bad uw team. Probably will be a shit game That ends with wazzu storming the field. -1 is good value still.haie said:In 2015 UW was 5-6, cuog had just barely missed out on the North missing a fg against Stanford, and UW still ran them over.
They've lost to every team with more talent than them outside of ASU who turned it over like 4 times in a half. This includes aids ridden SC obviously.
Should be a good game and why bet on what's probably going to come down to flukey turnovers.
Seems obvious to everyone to just run the ball at UW but it probably comes down to picks from DeLaura vs Huard/Morris. I think they will have to throw the ball a decent amount which they tend to do no matter the opponent. They don't have a White/Charbonnet type of back.
I haven't watched them much but it seems like DeLaura is awesome one game and mostly turnover prone the next. More of a toss-up than it looks because UW has found ways to lose in the end.
Big question is Huard obviously.
