Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Ken Griswold on Wilcox

2

Comments

  • AtomicDawgAtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,242 Standard Supporter
    Why hire him as hc when you could probably get him as your dc a year later. Everybody wins.
  • bananasnblondesbananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,432
    Kim keeps saying that same shit of "Cal is an impossible place to win. " Recent coaches have certainly not found that to the case.
  • chuckchuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,390 Swaye's Wigwam

    Kim keeps saying that same shit of "Cal is an impossible place to win. " Recent coaches have certainly not found that to the case.

    Has anyone suggested to Kim that Wilcox go to some other training ground where it's possible to win, prove that he can do so, and then enter the conversation for primo HC positions?
  • chuckchuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,390 Swaye's Wigwam

    Kim keeps saying that same shit of "Cal is an impossible place to win. " Recent coaches have certainly not found that to the case.

    If its such an impossible place to win maybe he shouldn't have taken the job? I don't think other programs were exactly knocking down his door though...
    He went there to be a mediocre coach at a lower tier place. If he thought that was a good bet to springboard him into a blue blood job it says something about his intelligence.
  • AtomicDawgAtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,242 Standard Supporter
    chuck said:

    Kim keeps saying that same shit of "Cal is an impossible place to win. " Recent coaches have certainly not found that to the case.

    If its such an impossible place to win maybe he shouldn't have taken the job? I don't think other programs were exactly knocking down his door though...
    He went there to be a mediocre coach at a lower tier place. If he thought that was a good bet to springboard him into a blue blood job it says something about his intelligence.
    He went there because it was a power 5 gig and it paid way more than the dc of Wisconsin.

    If his goal was to get an upper tier job he should have gone to the mwc first probably. I don’t fault him. Get it while the gettin is good.
  • CFetters_Nacho_LoverCFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 31,113 Founders Club

    Remember that Kim likes Wilcox because Wilcox (or probably Sirmon) used to feed him recruiting information.

    That is the only thing Kim cares about.

    Didn’t Kim forget his members only jacket in Wilcox’s office?
  • Mad_SonMad_Son Member Posts: 10,194

    Wilcox

    Pros:

    • He's not Lake
    • He built a better culture than Petersen at Cal
    • Low floor - based on what he did at Cal pre-COVID, doubt he would ever have a losing season at Washington
    • The defense will always be good
    • Evan Weaver as LB coach?
    Cons:
    • Unexciting - this gets no one to buy tickets to games
    • He lost to Lake - but didn't Petersen lose to Willingham AND Sark?
    • He's struggling in a Pac-12 that is as bad as it has ever been
    • Low ceiling - he's put a decent amount on tape and if he was an elite coach he would have already popped and he hasn't
    • His offenses were always Donovan-level bad. Like always.
    • Any talk of him being able to beat Oregon or nearly beat Oregon. Oregon DGAF about playing Cal and aren't up for that game every year. Wait till he has to play Oregon when there's a W on the helmet. It's also like how Wilcox was going to stop the Chip Kelly offense because he did it at Boise State then got raped every year at UW.
    Did I mention he lost to Lake?
    Cohen probably thinks he's hawt
    We've all seen him work his tongue
  • dirtysouwfdawgdirtysouwfdawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,693 Swaye's Wigwam

    Maybe if we hire someone classy like Sark, Kwat will come back

    I’m in sick ‘Em beat bear country but still enough ut fans. They are about to lynch both of them… yes, I realized what I just said. This is central texASS though.

    It just means more.
  • BonedogBonedog Member Posts: 650
    Cal still to high
  • digitsdigits Member Posts: 1,687
    Wilner is such a clueless ass-clown for putting this out there and having idiot Husky fans latch onto it. So let me get this straight, Peterman quits on us?, we? hire his protégé Lake, who turns out to be an absolute bust, and our solution is to hire another Peterman disciple who hasn't done jack shit at Cal? Fuck that noise, we need to go out and hire the best coach out there. Unfortunately, USC is in the market too.
  • WRDawgWRDawg Member Posts: 58
    Don’t forget he’s a Duck alumni and so is his DC. How could an alumni ever want to beat the shit outta the team they once played for…
  • godawgstgodawgst Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,531 Founders Club
    Justin Wilcox = just fine. Nothing more nothing less. If you want your program to be just fine (7-9 wins) then he is your man.

    Here's the deal if you can be even just above average in the shitty Pac-12 (especially the North) your floor should be 9 wins. Wilcox's ceiling is that and to get there he would have to have a year like Oregon is having where teams shit the bed (including his Cal team) multiple times in a season giving them the win.
  • 2Z42Z4 Member Posts: 23
    Wilcox was DC when Boise State (#14) beat Oregon (#16) in Chip Kelly's first game as a head coach, with Oregon playing a community college transfer who was closer to a fullback as QB1. Oregon possessed the ball in that game for 10 minutes and change and turned it over twice in the 4th quarter. If someone hung their hat on that as the evidence of Wilcox's ability at DC or HC...that's too small a sample size. And they forgot Wilcox was DC at Tennessee the following year when Oregon bent them over 48-13 in their own stadium.

    That's part of what's wrong with coaching searches - picking a small sample size of stuff that might be outliers to justify a rosier picture. Which is how Sark keeps getting hired.
  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,392 Swaye's Wigwam
    Yeah Wilcox was fired up after Oregon fumbled to end the game last year.

    Hiring grads of opposing schools to do your marketing is stupid. Coaches, doesn't matter and it's all personal egos and wins.

    Does remind me though that Wilcox wasn't too happy with someone after 2013, "9 wins" and all that.
  • DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 65,171 Founders Club

    Wilcox

    Pros:

    • He's not Lake
    • He built a better culture than Petersen at Cal
    • Low floor - based on what he did at Cal pre-COVID, doubt he would ever have a losing season at Washington
    • The defense will always be good
    • Evan Weaver as LB coach?
    Cons:
    • Unexciting - this gets no one to buy tickets to games
    • He lost to Lake - but didn't Petersen lose to Willingham AND Sark?
    • He's struggling in a Pac-12 that is as bad as it has ever been
    • Low ceiling - he's put a decent amount on tape and if he was an elite coach he would have already popped and he hasn't
    • His offenses were always Donovan-level bad. Like always.
    • Any talk of him being able to beat Oregon or nearly beat Oregon. Oregon DGAF about playing Cal and aren't up for that game every year. Wait till he has to play Oregon when there's a W on the helmet. It's also like how Wilcox was going to stop the Chip Kelly offense because he did it at Boise State then got raped every year at UW.
    Did I mention he lost to Lake?
    Cohen probably thinks he's hawt
    Hedges thought Rick was hot
Sign In or Register to comment.