Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Comments

  • Fenderbender123Fenderbender123 Member Posts: 2,989
    I'm afraid of nuclear power because on average it kills almost one whole person a year worldwide. Sure, coal mining alone kills 5 people just in the US every year... But still.
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,831 Standard Supporter
    Is it "THE" scientists pouring water on nuclear or just plain scientists?

    The Throbber only follows THE science like a good little quisling.



  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,458 Standard Supporter
    Hell nuclear is less pollution that wind power. Makes one hell of a lot more juice too.
  • GoduckiesGoduckies Member Posts: 6,846
    Nuke power is the future.... Sadly the left would rather kill birds
  • SourcesSources Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 4,015 Founders Club
    The fact that it was abandoned in the first place is absurd. Then again, facts rarely matter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,689 Founders Club
    Sources said:

    The fact that it was abandoned in the first place is absurd. Then again, facts rarely matter

    Jane Fonda is to blame. As always



    That was after Three Mile Island and before Chernoble
  • HustlinOwlHustlinOwl Member Posts: 953
    Sledog said:

    Hell nuclear is less pollution that wind power. Makes one hell of a lot more juice too.

    Chernobyl and Fukushima would beg to differ. A few people are always going to die, but having to abandon full blown cities for 1,000 years is a little more risky than a windmill falling over.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,458 Standard Supporter

    Sledog said:

    Hell nuclear is less pollution that wind power. Makes one hell of a lot more juice too.

    Chernobyl and Fukushima would beg to differ. A few people are always going to die, but having to abandon full blown cities for 1,000 years is a little more risky than a windmill falling over.
    Yeah show me a picture of Nagasaki and Hiroshima. I recall 500,000 years until habitable.

    Science and shit.
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,713 Standard Supporter
    How many nuke powerplants on US naval vessels since 1954 and we haven't had a single accidental release of radiation and no deaths. The recipe is pretty easy. Get industry and some real government scientist to design a standard 1,000 megawatt nuclear reactor and supporting infrastructure. No more custom nukes with huge cost overruns as it is designed on the run. Have the design federally permitted with no state or environmental court challenges. Don't build them in earthquake zones. Open up Yucca Mountain for permanent waste disposal.
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,713 Standard Supporter

    Sledog said:

    Hell nuclear is less pollution that wind power. Makes one hell of a lot more juice too.

    Chernobyl and Fukushima would beg to differ. A few people are always going to die, but having to abandon full blown cities for 1,000 years is a little more risky than a windmill falling over.
    It's not a windmill falling over. It's millions killed because of climate change.

    PS Chernobyl had nothing to do with US nukes and don't build a nuke in an earthquake tsunami zone. You suck at this.
  • GoduckiesGoduckies Member Posts: 6,846

    How many nuke powerplants on US naval vessels since 1954 and we haven't had a single accidental release of radiation and no deaths. The recipe is pretty easy. Get industry and some real government scientist to design a standard 1,000 megawatt nuclear reactor and supporting infrastructure. No more custom nukes with huge cost overruns as it is designed on the run. Have the design federally permitted with no state or environmental court challenges. Don't build them in earthquake zones. Open up Yucca Mountain for permanent waste disposal.

    100%
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    How can Al Gore and his friends get rich off of nuclear power plants? There's your real answer.
Sign In or Register to comment.