Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

New billionaire tax

BendintheriverBendintheriver Member Posts: 6,186 Standard Supporter
We know the rats on here believe Yellen when she says the tax on billionaires is not a tax. Stretch for once told the truth and called it a tax, but the dishonest rats in this admin quickly tried to lie to cover her truth, hence we got that idiot biden and yellen lying about a tax not being a tax.

What they are trying to do is criminal. They polled horribly on forcing Americans to report any deposit over $600 so they took that out. Think of the gall it takes to try to use government to take away the rights of the individual and enslave it to the IRS. To force the individual to report simple financial transactions to big brother. There is so much wrong with this spending proposal and the taxes that are somehow in a rats mind not taxes. The increase in the cost of goods this is going to bring about will be astounding and felt from top to bottom. In addition when you spend hundreds of billions on unnecessary climate change bullshit, those changes are not going to make lives easier or cheaper. This we know.

This new tax, no tax bullshit on billionaire's and their unrealized gains should never be allowed. For those that don't know, this new idea is to audit the personal and professional belongings of every billionaire and tax the asset growth even though those assets, again, personal (like a painting or Nike shoe collection, etc) and professional, have not been sold and realized any touchable, spendable capital gain. They are going to tax them before they even know what the taxes would be. How messed up is that. How long do you think until they do that to all of us?

Imagine that in year one they come into your home, value your personal property and claim that your assets are going to increase in year 2 by 10% and then they tax you at that amount. You have to pay it. If you don't have the cash you have to sell off the assets to pay the 10% of unrealized capital gains. Now year 2 comes, you have paid the government the cash they have demanded and the economy tanks. Your assets are worth less and the environment for the selling of those assets is not conducive to turning them into cash. The government got their money and you just got fucked. How in any sane persons mind does this make sense?

This government is going to spend 80 billion on more IRS auditors. They aren't spending 80 billion dollars just so they can audit 700 billionaires. They are going to set up the ground work to raise taxes and enforce them on everyone. Why else would we need to flush 80 billion down the IRS drain?

This shit is actually very alarming and everyone should be up in arms over it but the rat media is not revealing these facts. They are running roughshod over the truth.

https://www.politico.com/newsletters/weekly-tax/2021/10/25/will-wydens-new-wealth-tax-survive-the-courts-798431





Comments

  • Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,923 Swaye's Wigwam
    The unintended consequence of all of this is going to destroy the average persons 401k and personal stock holdings. Maybe that’s the intended consequence though.

  • BendintheriverBendintheriver Member Posts: 6,186 Standard Supporter
    Bob_C said:

    The unintended consequence of all of this is going to destroy the average persons 401k and personal stock holdings. Maybe that’s the intended consequence though.

    I have already heard rat prognosticators talking about duplicating this gains tax on 401K's of those who they consider to be too wealthy. These are not billionaires, these are just those of us who they deem to be too wealthy. Those same rat talking heads, on the same talk show, on the same day just five minutes apart went even further and suggested a capital gains tax on the wealthy's 401k AND the taking away of their Social Security benefits. These rats felt perfectly comfortable taking away some people's retirement investments. If we let this shit continue it will happen, I guarantee you.

    The left is emboldened right now and they have no problems speaking out loud about their communist/socialist ideals and ideas for you and me. They fully believe that they have every right to determine who are going to be penalized to finance their utopia.
  • DoogieMcDoogersonDoogieMcDoogerson Member Posts: 2,495
    If they spend 80b on more auditors and the average cost for the auditor and all the infrastructure around the auditor (software, systems, benefits, etc) costs 200K, that's 400,000 more auditors. That's 1 new auditor for every 320 households in the US.
  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,475 Founders Club
    I don't have a problem taxing billionaires more.
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,710 Standard Supporter

    I don't have a problem taxing billionaires more.

    The problem is what is the federal government going to do with the "extra" money? Taxing the private sector only makes sense if the public sector is going to do something that has any cost-benefit to the private sector. Something like the gasoline tax to build the interstate highway system comes to mind. But the US Department of Education doesn't educate. Giving them more money just creates more negative education. Giving the Department of Energy more money doesn't create more energy. Are we getting our money's worth from the CDC and NIH? Phuck 'em. Starve the beast, don't feed it.
  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,475 Founders Club
    edited October 2021

    I don't have a problem taxing billionaires more.

    The problem is what is the federal government going to do with the "extra" money? Taxing the private sector only makes sense if the public sector is going to do something that has any cost-benefit to the private sector. Something like the gasoline tax to build the interstate highway system comes to mind. But the US Department of Education doesn't educate. Giving them more money just creates more negative education. Giving the Department of Energy more money doesn't create more energy. Are we getting our money's worth from the CDC and NIH? Phuck 'em. Starve the beast, don't feed it.
    Pay off the 28 trillion. If we default on it, things get ugly.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,032
    edited October 2021

    I don't have a problem taxing billionaires more.

    The problem is what is the federal government going to do with the "extra" money? Taxing the private sector only makes sense if the public sector is going to do something that has any cost-benefit to the private sector. Something like the gasoline tax to build the interstate highway system comes to mind. But the US Department of Education doesn't educate. Giving them more money just creates more negative education. Giving the Department of Energy more money doesn't create more energy. Are we getting our money's worth from the CDC and NIH? Phuck 'em. Starve the beast, don't feed it.
    Pay off the 28 trillion
    But they aren't doing that, in fact they are trying to add an additional $5 Trillion in new spending. That doesn't even account for the $2 Trillion in debt we have from our current level of spending this year. They are intentionally destroying our currency.
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,710 Standard Supporter
    SFGbob said:

    I don't have a problem taxing billionaires more.

    The problem is what is the federal government going to do with the "extra" money? Taxing the private sector only makes sense if the public sector is going to do something that has any cost-benefit to the private sector. Something like the gasoline tax to build the interstate highway system comes to mind. But the US Department of Education doesn't educate. Giving them more money just creates more negative education. Giving the Department of Energy more money doesn't create more energy. Are we getting our money's worth from the CDC and NIH? Phuck 'em. Starve the beast, don't feed it.
    Pay off the 28 trillion
    But they aren't doing that, in fact they are trying to add an additional $5 Trillion in new spending. That doesn't even account for the $2 Trillion in debt we have from our current level of spending this year. They are intentionally destroying our currency.
    Exactly, giving a leftard more money with the promise that it will go for debt repayment is flying unicorn sh*t. None of the proposed tax increases are tied to a spending freeze and debt repayment. Pretending otherwise is not a high character reasoning process. None of it is tied to a secure border and stopping the US from being the world's welfare magnet.
Sign In or Register to comment.