Climate Change Scientists Meet in New Zealand...

d2d

d2d

Fire_Marshall_Bill

Bill Nye disagrees

d2d

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

Bill Nye disagrees

Bill Nye is a Bachelor of SCIENCE! (in mechanical engineering)

YoureAFuckingJelly

Fire_Marshall_Bill

d2d said:

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

Bill Nye disagrees

Bill Nye is a Bachelor of SCIENCE! (in mechanical engineering)

Death2Duck's attempt at Ebonics folks. Enjoy.

d2d

d2d

YoureAFuckingJelly said:

Libtards try to truncate arguments by saying that nothing remains of any arguments against their arguments. Regarding Obamacare, Obama said the debate is “settled” and “over.” Libtards also say the debate about global warming is “over,” so everyone should pipe down. And they say the debates about the efficacy of universal preschool, and the cost-benefit balance of a minimum-wage increase, are over. Declaring an argument over is so much more useful to Libtards than engaging with evidence.

OZONE

d2d said:

That appears to be a very scientific study that produced some amazing analytical charts...

One question about the labels on those charts... what exactly is the difference between natural CO2 and man made CO2?

Is the man made variety labelled so that people can tell it apart from the natural CO2?

Can I buy the natural stuff in bottles somewhere?

I'm glad I accidentally stumbled into this part of the husky board so I can see where the real cerebral husky giants hang out.

allpurpleallgold

d2d said:

YoureAFuckingJelly said:

Libtards try to truncate arguments by saying that nothing remains of any arguments against their arguments. Regarding Obamacare, Obama said the debate is “settled” and “over.” Libtards also say the debate about global warming is “over,” so everyone should pipe down. And they say the debates about the efficacy of universal preschool, and the cost-benefit balance of a minimum-wage increase, are over. Declaring an argument over is so much more useful to Libtards than engaging with evidence.

We've seen you engage with evidence. You embarrassed yourself.

CFetters_Nacho_Lover

Threads like this make me miss Colledoog

MikeDamone

Let me reiterate for you dumb fucks. Whether or not climate change is happening isn't even an issue. It has happened and will happen until the sun eventually incinerates the earth. Nothing humans can do or have done can overcome the forces of the solar system. Politically, climate change has nothing to do with pollution. It has to do with carbon credits, cronyism, and a means to implement the first global tax. It's simply a matter of who gets rich off it. There will be winners and there will be losers, but the planet will not be affected by what we do.

topdawgnc

MikeDamone said:

Let me reiterate for you dumb fucks. Whether or not climate change is happening isn't even an issue. It has happened and will happen until the sun eventually incinerates the earth. Nothing humans can do or have done can overcome the forces of the solar system. Politically, climate change has nothing to do with pollution. It has to do with carbon credits, cronyism, and a means to implement the first global tax. It's simply a matter of who gets rich off it. There will be winners and there will be losers, but the planet will not be affected by what we do.

Game. Set. Match.

YoureAFuckingJelly

MikeDamone said:

Let me reiterate for you dumb fucks. Whether or not climate change is happening isn't even an issue. It has happened and will happen until the sun eventually incinerates the earth. Nothing humans can do or have done can overcome the forces of the solar system. Politically, climate change has nothing to do with pollution. It has to do with carbon credits, cronyism, and a means to implement the first global tax. It's simply a matter of who gets rich off it. There will be winners and there will be losers, but the planet will not be affected by what we do.

disafuckinggree

If management of all current cropland shifted to reflect the regenerative model as practiced at the research sites included in the white paper, more than 40 percent of annual emissions could potentially be captured. If, at the same time, all global pasture was managed to a regenerative model, an additional 71 percent could be sequestered. Essentially, passing the 100 percent mark means a drawing down of excess greenhouse gases, resulting in the reversal of the greenhouse effect.

Regenerative organic agriculture is comprised of organic practices including (at a minimum): cover crops, residue mulching, composting and crop rotation. Conservation tillage, while not yet widely used in organic systems, is a regenerative organic practice integral to soil-carbon sequestration. Other biological farming systems that use some of these techniques include ecological, progressive, natural, pro-soil and carbon farming.

If sequestration rates were achieved on crop and pastureland across the globe, regenerative agriculture could sequester more than our current annual carbon dioxide emissions. Even if modest assumptions about soil’s carbon sequestration potential are made, regenerative agriculture can easily keep annual emissions to within the desirable range necessary if we are to have a good chance of limiting warming to 1.5°C by 2020

Organically managed soils can convert carbon from a greenhouse gas into a food-producing asset. It’s nothing new, and it’s already happening, but it’s not enough. This is the way we have to farm, period.

There’s a technology for massive planetary geo-engineering that’s tried and tested and available for widespread dissemination right now. It costs little and is adaptable to localities the world over. It can be rolled out tomorrow providing multiple benefits beyond climate stabilization. It’s photosynthesis.

The solution is farming like life on Earth matters; farming in a way that restores and even improves on the natural ability of the microbiology present in healthy soil to hold carbon. This kind of farming is called regenerative organic agriculture and it is the solution to climate change we need to implement today.

Pretty simple if you are thinking with more than just your teabag

longduckdong

Hoping MDeboners 6500 post is better. He just got owned

CuntWaffle

Hahahahahahaha

MikeDamone

YoureAFuckingJelly said:

MikeDamone said:

Let me reiterate for you dumb fucks. Whether or not climate change is happening isn't even an issue. It has happened and will happen until the sun eventually incinerates the earth. Nothing humans can do or have done can overcome the forces of the solar system. Politically, climate change has nothing to do with pollution. It has to do with carbon credits, cronyism, and a means to implement the first global tax. It's simply a matter of who gets rich off it. There will be winners and there will be losers, but the planet will not be affected by what we do.

disafuckinggree

If management of all current cropland shifted to reflect the regenerative model as practiced at the research sites included in the white paper, more than 40 percent of annual emissions could potentially be captured. If, at the same time, all global pasture was managed to a regenerative model, an additional 71 percent could be sequestered. Essentially, passing the 100 percent mark means a drawing down of excess greenhouse gases, resulting in the reversal of the greenhouse effect.

Regenerative organic agriculture is comprised of organic practices including (at a minimum): cover crops, residue mulching, composting and crop rotation. Conservation tillage, while not yet widely used in organic systems, is a regenerative organic practice integral to soil-carbon sequestration. Other biological farming systems that use some of these techniques include ecological, progressive, natural, pro-soil and carbon farming.

If sequestration rates were achieved on crop and pastureland across the globe, regenerative agriculture could sequester more than our current annual carbon dioxide emissions. Even if modest assumptions about soil’s carbon sequestration potential are made, regenerative agriculture can easily keep annual emissions to within the desirable range necessary if we are to have a good chance of limiting warming to 1.5°C by 2020

Organically managed soils can convert carbon from a greenhouse gas into a food-producing asset. It’s nothing new, and it’s already happening, but it’s not enough. This is the way we have to farm, period.

There’s a technology for massive planetary geo-engineering that’s tried and tested and available for widespread dissemination right now. It costs little and is adaptable to localities the world over. It can be rolled out tomorrow providing multiple benefits beyond climate stabilization. It’s photosynthesis.

The solution is farming like life on Earth matters; farming in a way that restores and even improves on the natural ability of the microbiology present in healthy soil to hold carbon. This kind of farming is called regenerative organic agriculture and it is the solution to climate change we need to implement today.

Pretty simple if you are thinking with more than just your teabag

Great cut and paste from Rodale Institute as always. Partisan hack. And when you rip off other peoples ideas, at least give them credit. Typical.

creepycoug

d2d said:

I will say this about you: you hang paper like a mother fucking champion. You make Rohm look like a pussy when you're trying to get your point across.

If only you were a bit more polished ....

QuornDawg

MikeDamone said:

YoureAFuckingJelly said:

MikeDamone said:

Let me reiterate for you dumb fucks. Whether or not climate change is happening isn't even an issue. It has happened and will happen until the sun eventually incinerates the earth. Nothing humans can do or have done can overcome the forces of the solar system. Politically, climate change has nothing to do with pollution. It has to do with carbon credits, cronyism, and a means to implement the first global tax. It's simply a matter of who gets rich off it. There will be winners and there will be losers, but the planet will not be affected by what we do.

disafuckinggree

If management of all current cropland shifted to reflect the regenerative model as practiced at the research sites included in the white paper, more than 40 percent of annual emissions could potentially be captured. If, at the same time, all global pasture was managed to a regenerative model, an additional 71 percent could be sequestered. Essentially, passing the 100 percent mark means a drawing down of excess greenhouse gases, resulting in the reversal of the greenhouse effect.

Regenerative organic agriculture is comprised of organic practices including (at a minimum): cover crops, residue mulching, composting and crop rotation. Conservation tillage, while not yet widely used in organic systems, is a regenerative organic practice integral to soil-carbon sequestration. Other biological farming systems that use some of these techniques include ecological, progressive, natural, pro-soil and carbon farming.

If sequestration rates were achieved on crop and pastureland across the globe, regenerative agriculture could sequester more than our current annual carbon dioxide emissions. Even if modest assumptions about soil’s carbon sequestration potential are made, regenerative agriculture can easily keep annual emissions to within the desirable range necessary if we are to have a good chance of limiting warming to 1.5°C by 2020

Organically managed soils can convert carbon from a greenhouse gas into a food-producing asset. It’s nothing new, and it’s already happening, but it’s not enough. This is the way we have to farm, period.

There’s a technology for massive planetary geo-engineering that’s tried and tested and available for widespread dissemination right now. It costs little and is adaptable to localities the world over. It can be rolled out tomorrow providing multiple benefits beyond climate stabilization. It’s photosynthesis.

The solution is farming like life on Earth matters; farming in a way that restores and even improves on the natural ability of the microbiology present in healthy soil to hold carbon. This kind of farming is called regenerative organic agriculture and it is the solution to climate change we need to implement today.

Pretty simple if you are thinking with more than just your teabag

Great cut and paste from Rodale Institute as always. Partisan hack. And when you rip off other peoples ideas, at least give them credit. Typical.

The judges would have also accepted

d2d

YoureAFuckingJelly said:

whatshouldicareabout

The best way to fix global warming is to light yourself on fire and never return to these forums.