If you girls ever come up with anything, you won't see me defending Joe the way you debased yourselves to defend Daddy.
And "defending daddy" consisted of asking for the evidence you had that Trump colluded with Russia in order to win the 2016 election. I defended the truth and facts while you pushed lies and bullshit Dazzler.
Daddy was impeached twice. A majority of Senators thought the charges had been proven in both cases.
As for Russian collusion, he did it. Conservatives used to be principled. #RIP_Krauthammer
If you girls ever come up with anything, you won't see me defending Joe the way you debased yourselves to defend Daddy.
And "defending daddy" consisted of asking for the evidence you had that Trump colluded with Russia in order to win the 2016 election. I defended the truth and facts while you pushed lies and bullshit Dazzler.
Daddy was impeached twice. A majority of Senators thought the charges had been proven in both cases.
As for Russian collusion, he did it. Conservatives used to be principled. #RIP_Krauthammer
So does a majority of jurors equal conviction in criminal matters? Askin' fer a shitty lawyer pal. I'll wait.
If you girls ever come up with anything, you won't see me defending Joe the way you debased yourselves to defend Daddy.
And "defending daddy" consisted of asking for the evidence you had that Trump colluded with Russia in order to win the 2016 election. I defended the truth and facts while you pushed lies and bullshit Dazzler.
Daddy was impeached twice. A majority of Senators thought the charges had been proven in both cases.
As for Russian collusion, he did it. Conservatives used to be principled. #RIP_Krauthammer
Weird - the impeachment trial verdict didn't come out that way.
Impeach doesn't mean guilty, Dazzler - no matter how many ways you try to spin it. NOT GUILTY.
Not arguing Trump. Pointing out your ongoing idiocy.
The number of keystrokes wasted on What's His Name is disheartening. Long established liars do not suddenly have a come to Jesus moment where they decide the truth makes them a better person. I don't respond to What's His Name directly with words, I have this one click response that require no reading whatsoever. It's wonderful!
If you girls ever come up with anything, you won't see me defending Joe the way you debased yourselves to defend Daddy.
And "defending daddy" consisted of asking for the evidence you had that Trump colluded with Russia in order to win the 2016 election. I defended the truth and facts while you pushed lies and bullshit Dazzler.
Daddy was impeached twice. A majority of Senators thought the charges had been proven in both cases.
As for Russian collusion, he did it. Conservatives used to be principled. #RIP_Krauthammer
In other news, Democrats have never been principled.
“Come on H this is linked to Celtic’s account.” Those nine words from a retired Secret Service agent to Hunter Biden in recently released emails may prove a nasty complication for some in Washington who have struggled to contain the blowback from the still-unfolding scandal linked to Hunter Biden’s infamous laptop.
“Celtic” was the Secret Service code name for Joe Biden, and recent disclosures may puncture the media’s cone-of-silence around the scandal. The emails link President Biden to his son’s accounts and indicate a commingling of funds with money coming from controversial foreign sources. Even more embarrassing, the shared account may have been used to pay a Russian prostitute named “Yanna.”
The commingling of funds is the latest contraction of President Biden’s repeated claims that he was unaware and uninvolved in past dealings by his son. Given these links, there are legitimate questions of why the Justice Department has not sought a special counsel in the ongoing investigation of alleged money-laundering and tax violations linked to the president’s son. More importantly, even if there are no criminal charges, there is now a compelling need for an independent report on the alleged influence peddling operation by Hunter, his uncle James Biden, and potentially his father, President Biden.
In the latest disclosures from the laptop, a former secret service agent reportedly texted Hunter on May 24, 2018, when he was holed up with a Russian prostitute in an expensive room at The Jeremy Hotel in Los Angeles. Hunter wired the woman $25,000. That alone was nothing out of the ordinary for Hunter who, while his father served as vice president, seemed to divide his time equally between influence-peddling and personal debaucheries.
Hunter clearly only had influence and access to sell. We know now that foreign interests gave Hunter millions at a time that he admits that he was a crack addict and alcoholic — in his words, “Drinking a quart of vodka a day by yourself in a room is absolutely, completely debilitating,” as well as “smoking crack around the clock.”
However, the tranche of emails raises a new and disturbing element: the possible mixing of accounts and funds between Hunter and his father. If true, President Biden could be directly implicated in ongoing investigations into his son’s money transfers and dealings.
Most notable are the new emails from Eric Schwerin, his business partner at the Rosemont Seneca consultancy, referencing the payment of household bills for both Joe Biden and Hunter Biden. He also notes that he was transferring money from Joe Biden. If true, the communications indicate that some of President Biden’s personal expenses were paid out of shared accounts with Hunter, including accounts that may have been used to pay for prostitutes. Rosemont Seneca is directly involved in the alleged influence peddling schemes and questionable money transfers from Chinese and Russian sources.
There is and long has been lots of evidence that Hunter has done many things wrong. But Joe? Nothing yet.
The joint account is not evidence of wrongdoing in itself, but it is bewildering and requires some reasonable explanation. The fact you gals defended Daddy’s open, public corruption and he dared you to name it makes you hypocrites at best.
There is and long has been lots of evidence that Hunter has done many things wrong. But Joe? Nothing yet.
The joint account is not evidence of wrongdoing in itself, but it is bewildering and requires some reasonable explanation. The fact you gals defended Daddy’s open, public corruption and he dared you to name it makes you hypocrites at best.
Liars lie and love being lied to. You really suck at this, counselor.
There is and long has been lots of evidence that Hunter has done many things wrong. But Joe? Nothing yet.
The joint account is not evidence of wrongdoing in itself, but it is bewildering and requires some reasonable explanation. The fact you gals defended Daddy’s open, public corruption and he dared you to name it makes you hypocrites at best.
There is and long has been lots of evidence that Hunter has done many things wrong. But Joe? Nothing yet.
The joint account is not evidence of wrongdoing in itself, but it is bewildering and requires some reasonable explanation. The fact you gals defended Daddy’s open, public corruption and he dared you to name it makes you hypocrites at best.
Go ahead, Dazzler. With big lawyer words, detail specifics of Trump’s corruption
Comments
Thanks for playing
Impeach doesn't mean guilty, Dazzler - no matter how many ways you try to spin it. NOT GUILTY.
Not arguing Trump. Pointing out your ongoing idiocy.
As per usual.
The joint account is not evidence of wrongdoing in itself, but it is bewildering and requires some reasonable explanation. The fact you gals defended Daddy’s open, public corruption and he dared you to name it makes you hypocrites at best.
But but Ivanka’s trademarks.