Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Shots fired
PurpleThrobber
Member Posts: 48,812 
https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/paul-mccartney-calls-the-rolling-stones-a-blues-cover-band-1241319/
And so there's no confusion on where the Throbber stands on this issue - the Beatles suck.
And so there's no confusion on where the Throbber stands on this issue - the Beatles suck.
Comments
-
Stones suck.
-
this is a brown eye for the Stones
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10085975/Rolling-Stones-drop-hit-song-Brown-Sugar-tour-set-list-now.html -
McCartney isn’t totally off the mark. He just used the wrong tense. The Stones “were” a blues cover band to start. The first 5 albums were almost entirely blues and R&B covers. They didn’t really hit their stride as songwriters till later in 1965, two years into their recording career.PurpleThrobber said:https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/paul-mccartney-calls-the-rolling-stones-a-blues-cover-band-1241319/
And so there's no confusion on where the Throbber stands on this issue - the Beatles suck.
The Beatles on the other hand had great original compositions from the get go, albeit with a some covers on albums 1, 2 and 4.
I’m still Stones > Beatles based on what the Stones did from 1968- 72, but still….
Shut hole, you ignorant Idaho hillbilly -
They should fight it out.
-
-
Paul is a faggot
-
Things John Would say.RaceBannon said:Paul is a faggot
-
I know they are your wheelhouse. Frankly, both of these bands are too early for me to care all that much. I don't care much for Mick, though. Of course, this is coming from a guy who loves David Lee Roth, so YMMV.YellowSnow said: -
You bias against pre 80s befuddles me. IFL love David Lee Roth era Van Halen as much as any guy here, but I love Elvis too.BleachedAnusDawg said:
I know they are your wheelhouse. Frankly, both of these bands are too early for me to care all that much. I don't care much for Mick, though. Of course, this is coming from a guy who loves David Lee Roth, so YMMV.YellowSnow said: -
For the record, VH is late-1970's. I am pretty hit and miss prior to the late-70's era. Hendrix and Zeppelin, yes. Beatles and Stones, no. Probably based upon the level of cranked up and distorted guitar.YellowSnow said:
You bias against pre 80s befuddles me. IFL love David Lee Roth era Van Halen as much as any guy here, but I love Elvis too.BleachedAnusDawg said:
I know they are your wheelhouse. Frankly, both of these bands are too early for me to care all that much. I don't care much for Mick, though. Of course, this is coming from a guy who loves David Lee Roth, so YMMV.YellowSnow said:
