Jordan Peterson: The collapse of our values is a greater threat than climate change

AtomicPiss

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4zZ2ker1iI

dtd

Except that our values never included not destroying the planet for cheeseburgers, SUVs, and gold chains. Oh fuck, where am I? get me outta here.

TheKobeStopper

This is the pill head, right?

hardhat

TheKobeStopper said:

This is the pill head, right?

This is the wimpy fag, right?

LoneStarDawg

TheKobeStopper said:

This is the pill head, right?

1. Ad hominem ("to the man") refers to an attack on the person; for example, regarding their past or personal traits, as a means of undermining/opposing their argument, without having to provide any evidence. Loaded questions evoke a similar effect.

TheKobeStopper

LoneStarDawg said:

TheKobeStopper said:

This is the pill head, right?

1. Ad hominem ("to the man") refers to an attack on the person; for example, regarding their past or personal traits, as a means of undermining/opposing their argument, without having to provide any evidence. Loaded questions evoke a similar effect.

I don’t think being a drug addict undermines his argument. Sounds like you do though.

hardhat

TheKobeStopper said:

LoneStarDawg said:

TheKobeStopper said:

This is the pill head, right?

1. Ad hominem ("to the man") refers to an attack on the person; for example, regarding their past or personal traits, as a means of undermining/opposing their argument, without having to provide any evidence. Loaded questions evoke a similar effect.

I don’t think being a drug addict undermines his argument. Sounds like you do though.

You're the cunt that brought it up. Second time today you've mentioned something and then accused someone else of doing it. This is how pathetic you've become.

Kaepsknee

hardhat said:

TheKobeStopper said:

LoneStarDawg said:

TheKobeStopper said:

This is the pill head, right?

1. Ad hominem ("to the man") refers to an attack on the person; for example, regarding their past or personal traits, as a means of undermining/opposing their argument, without having to provide any evidence. Loaded questions evoke a similar effect.

I don’t think being a drug addict undermines his argument. Sounds like you do though.

You're the cunt that brought it up. Second time today you've mentioned something and then accused someone else of doing it. This is how pathetic you've become.

Become?


Nope it’s always been a feature.

46XiJCAB

TheKobeStopper said:

This is the pill head, right?

Pretend he’s Hunter, the smartest man Joey knows.
You make this so easy that it almost makes me ashamed of myself.

TheKobeStopper

hardhat said:

TheKobeStopper said:

LoneStarDawg said:

TheKobeStopper said:

This is the pill head, right?

1. Ad hominem ("to the man") refers to an attack on the person; for example, regarding their past or personal traits, as a means of undermining/opposing their argument, without having to provide any evidence. Loaded questions evoke a similar effect.

I don’t think being a drug addict undermines his argument. Sounds like you do though.

You're the cunt that brought it up. Second time today you've mentioned something and then accused someone else of doing it. This is how pathetic you've become.

I asked a clarifying question. Again, I don’t think his pill addiction undermines his point, it’s only an ad hominem if you do. Do you have a problem with a pill head lecturing people about the decline of our “values”?

46XiJCAB

“Values”. Translation, I have none. Self own by Kobe. Painful.

hardhat

TheKobeStopper said:

hardhat said:

TheKobeStopper said:

LoneStarDawg said:

TheKobeStopper said:

This is the pill head, right?

1. Ad hominem ("to the man") refers to an attack on the person; for example, regarding their past or personal traits, as a means of undermining/opposing their argument, without having to provide any evidence. Loaded questions evoke a similar effect.

I don’t think being a drug addict undermines his argument. Sounds like you do though.

You're the cunt that brought it up. Second time today you've mentioned something and then accused someone else of doing it. This is how pathetic you've become.

I asked a clarifying question. Again, I don’t think his pill addiction undermines his point, it’s only an ad hominem if you do. Do you have a problem with a pill head lecturing people about the decline of our “values”?

It's a loaded question, silly. Do you have a problem with someone as stupid as AOC lecturing people about tax policy when she is clearly an idiot? See how that works? It's only ad hominem if you do.