Dems Try To FORCE Conservative Justices To Retire So They Can Shoehorn Radical Judges In

AtomicPiss

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbVzRdzwxsQ

TheKobeStopper

Taken at face value, can you explain how this would be worse than what you guys did with what should have been Obama’s last Supreme Court seat?

Bendintheriver

TheKobeStopper said:

Taken at face value, can you explain how this would be worse than what you guys did with what should have been Obama’s last Supreme Court seat?

You mean you are trying to equate a procedure in the Senate, one that can only take place when there is a vacancy, to rats trying to force Judges to retire?

In your mind that is the same thing?

Pitchfork51

TheKobeStopper said:

Taken at face value, can you explain how this would be worse than what you guys did with what should have been Obama’s last Supreme Court seat?

The one where he failed at being a politician and screwed up

PurpleThrobber

TheKobeStopper said:

Taken at face value, can you explain how this would be worse than what you guys did with what should have been Obama’s last Supreme Court seat?

No. Because you've gone full retard and have lost all ability to exercise critical thought, logic and common sense.

hardhat

TheKobeStopper said:

Taken at face value, can you explain how this would be worse than what you guys did with what should have been Obama’s last Supreme Court seat?

46XiJCAB

Discussing Conservative Judges with a pic of John Roberts. I laffed.

SFGbob

TheKobeStopper said:

Taken at face value, can you explain how this would be worse than what you guys did with what should have been Obama’s last Supreme Court seat?

I always love apples to dogshit comparisons.

SFGbob

Bendintheriver said:

TheKobeStopper said:

Taken at face value, can you explain how this would be worse than what you guys did with what should have been Obama’s last Supreme Court seat?

You mean you are trying to equate a procedure in the Senate, one that can only take place when there is a vacancy, to rats trying to force Judges to retire?

In your mind that is the same thing?

And there's Mello the fucking pussy with a down vote. Hey Mello, pull on your big boy pants and tell us why anything he said was wrong you fucking Kunt.

SFGbob

hardhat said:

TheKobeStopper said:

Taken at face value, can you explain how this would be worse than what you guys did with what should have been Obama’s last Supreme Court seat?

Now how is that worse than what you guy's did to Obama's last Supreme Court seat?

46XiJCAB

SFGbob said:

TheKobeStopper said:

Taken at face value, can you explain how this would be worse than what you guys did with what should have been Obama’s last Supreme Court seat?

I always love apples to dogshit comparisons.

Kobe to my knowledge has never made a comparison that wasn't. And I've been reading his moronic posts for a long time. I like to cut myself too.

46XiJCAB

SFGbob said:

Bendintheriver said:

TheKobeStopper said:

Taken at face value, can you explain how this would be worse than what you guys did with what should have been Obama’s last Supreme Court seat?

You mean you are trying to equate a procedure in the Senate, one that can only take place when there is a vacancy, to rats trying to force Judges to retire?

In your mind that is the same thing?

And there's Mello the fucking pussy with a down vote. Hey Mello, pull on your big boy pants and tell us why anything he said was wrong you fucking Kunt.

Why are you assuming that Mello wears pants and not a diaper?

SFGbob

TheKobeStopper said:

Taken at face value, can you explain how this would be worse than what you guys did with what should have been Obama’s last Supreme Court seat?

Let me help you out Kobe because I know you're a dipshit. First of all it's not Obama's Supreme Court seat. Obama's role is nominate someone when a vacancy on the court opens up. He did that. The Senate can then either take up nomination or not. The Republicans, who were in the majority decided not to take up the Garland's nomination. Given how he has preformed as AG, I'd say the Republicans decided wisely.

Goduckies

SFGbob said:

TheKobeStopper said:

Taken at face value, can you explain how this would be worse than what you guys did with what should have been Obama’s last Supreme Court seat?

Let me help you out Kobe because I know you're a dipshit. First of all it's not Obama's Supreme Court seat. Obama's role is nominate someone when a vacancy on the court opens up. He did that. The Senate can then either take up nomination or not. The Republicans, who were in the majority decided not to take up the Garland's nomination. Given how he has preformed as AG, I'd say the Republicans decided wisely.

Yup Garland has shown to be a shill...very glad he isn't on the court... moderate my ass