keep Cook as a DB or back to WR?

BeerThirty

or just say fuck it, we don't need 5 WRs because our starter can't get them the ball anyways

HuskyJW

The fact we lost 4 to the portal….and 4 to injury and they still didn’t move him.

I think speaks for itself

whatshouldicareabout

John Ross played CB and ASJ played DE and Shaq played RB

Coaches need to find ways to put the best players on the field for each position group. Wouldn't be surprised to see some of our TEs play WR this week unless Bynum or Odunze are back

Canadawg

Odunze separated his should he won't be back yet imo

whatshouldicareabout

Canadawg said:

Odunze separated his should he won't be back yet imo

A one-armed Odunze would be our #1 WR right now

NeGgaPlEaSe

Why the fuck did we need WR’s against Montana. Should have played 3 tight ends ala Stanford and let Dick go wild. I’m still not understanding the offensive importance of Lake and Donovan.

RoadDawg55

NeGgaPlEaSe said:

Why the fuck did we need WR’s against Montana. Should have played 3 tight ends ala Stanford and let Dick go wild. I’m still not understanding the offensive importance of Lake and Donovan.

3 TE’s doesn’t help you run better and is archaic thinking. Those TE’s aren’t good enough blockers either.

Doogles

RoadDawg55 said:

NeGgaPlEaSe said:

Why the fuck did we need WR’s against Montana. Should have played 3 tight ends ala Stanford and let Dick go wild. I’m still not understanding the offensive importance of Lake and Donovan.

3 TE’s doesn’t help you run better and is archaic thinking. Those TE’s aren’t good enough blockers either.

Dissly and Sample ain't walking through that door

NeGgaPlEaSe

RoadDawg55 said:

NeGgaPlEaSe said:

Why the fuck did we need WR’s against Montana. Should have played 3 tight ends ala Stanford and let Dick go wild. I’m still not understanding the offensive importance of Lake and Donovan.

3 TE’s doesn’t help you run better and is archaic thinking. Those TE’s aren’t good enough blockers either.

It’s Montana

BeerThirty

NeGgaPlEaSe said:

RoadDawg55 said:

NeGgaPlEaSe said:

Why the fuck did we need WR’s against Montana. Should have played 3 tight ends ala Stanford and let Dick go wild. I’m still not understanding the offensive importance of Lake and Donovan.

3 TE’s doesn’t help you run better and is archaic thinking. Those TE’s aren’t good enough blockers either.

It’s Montana

And we lost

RoadDawg55

NeGgaPlEaSe said:

RoadDawg55 said:

NeGgaPlEaSe said:

Why the fuck did we need WR’s against Montana. Should have played 3 tight ends ala Stanford and let Dick go wild. I’m still not understanding the offensive importance of Lake and Donovan.

3 TE’s doesn’t help you run better and is archaic thinking. Those TE’s aren’t good enough blockers either.

It’s Montana

We shouldn’t need to line up 3 TE’s but point taken. Yes, UW should be able to dominate Montana up front. Kent Baer shouldn’t be shutting us down.

sonics1993

Cook was practicing at WR this week. Don't know if it's for emergency or whether he will be in the game plan.

BeerThirty

@sonics1993 update on Tuli? Training staff were checking his knee when he went down

digits

RoadDawg55 said:

NeGgaPlEaSe said:

RoadDawg55 said:

NeGgaPlEaSe said:

Why the fuck did we need WR’s against Montana. Should have played 3 tight ends ala Stanford and let Dick go wild. I’m still not understanding the offensive importance of Lake and Donovan.

3 TE’s doesn’t help you run better and is archaic thinking. Those TE’s aren’t good enough blockers either.

It’s Montana

We shouldn’t need to line up 3 TE’s but point taken. Yes, UW should be able to dominate Montana up front. Kent Baer shouldn’t be shutting us down.

Kent Baer... JFC.

DerekJohnson

digits said:

RoadDawg55 said:

NeGgaPlEaSe said:

RoadDawg55 said:

NeGgaPlEaSe said:

Why the fuck did we need WR’s against Montana. Should have played 3 tight ends ala Stanford and let Dick go wild. I’m still not understanding the offensive importance of Lake and Donovan.

3 TE’s doesn’t help you run better and is archaic thinking. Those TE’s aren’t good enough blockers either.

It’s Montana

We shouldn’t need to line up 3 TE’s but point taken. Yes, UW should be able to dominate Montana up front. Kent Baer shouldn’t be shutting us down.

Kent Baer... JFC.

When I was writing Bow Down to Willingham, Kent Baer was DC at San Jose State. I contacted their athletic department, and they got back to me with something very close to "Coach Baer said to tell you that he appreciates your offer to discuss his time at UW, but feels it is best to focus on the future. He wishes you good luck with your project."

FireCohen

sonics1993 said:

Cook was practicing at WR this week. Don't know if it's for emergency or whether he will be in the game plan.

Gosh we are fucked if the best wr option we have is a safety

BleachedAnusDawg

DerekJohnson said:

digits said:

RoadDawg55 said:

NeGgaPlEaSe said:

RoadDawg55 said:

NeGgaPlEaSe said:

Why the fuck did we need WR’s against Montana. Should have played 3 tight ends ala Stanford and let Dick go wild. I’m still not understanding the offensive importance of Lake and Donovan.

3 TE’s doesn’t help you run better and is archaic thinking. Those TE’s aren’t good enough blockers either.

It’s Montana

We shouldn’t need to line up 3 TE’s but point taken. Yes, UW should be able to dominate Montana up front. Kent Baer shouldn’t be shutting us down.

Kent Baer... JFC.

When I was writing Bow Down to Willingham, Kent Baer was DC at San Jose State. I contacted their athletic department, and they got back to me with something very close to "Coach Baer said to tell you that he appreciates your offer to discuss his time at UW, but feels it is best to focus on the future. He wishes you good luck with your project."

I sent some pointed emails to UW coaches when Baer was around and he actually replied to me and we traded emails for a couple days. He questioned how I could have any opinion when I hadn't played or coached and basically said I was an asshole. He even invited me to attend a practice and I took him up on it. Never heard back after that.