Michigan -6

ramenduck

Sportsbooks yanking their pants down. Holy shit if Michigan -6 at home isn’t free money, I don’t know what is.

This isn’t a troll post (I respect at least 30% of you if not slightly more). This is sound financial advice. Doogs and Ducks alike, bet the fucking house. Best of luck to everyone.

thechatch

I’ve got an extra 2k in cash and sweep funds….

Why the fuck not?

DerekJohnson

I have only bet on football at two different tims in the past 20 years. Once was January 2020 when I thought Lamar Jackson was a sure thing in the playoffs to cover. I won the first bet but the following weekend I lost. The other time was during the OwenTwelve season of 2008. The Huskies would be playing USC as 42 point underdogs, and I would go "there's no way UW covers that". And they would be 24 point underdogs to so-and-so and I'd be like "There's no way they're gonna cover that." I won bets four or five weeks in a row before I cashed out.

Today I just bet $200 that Michigan will cover -6

I actually think the Dwags might put up a fight for the first half. But there's no way they don't lose double digits.

TheRoarOfTheCrowd

Well we are back to having tinkerbell receivers so there is that... and the swinging gate ILB ing is inviting... I'm hearing that the game plan at Michigan is to run right at Diamond S but the problem is that he is so often in the wrong lane that it's hard to do.

godawgst

I thought that unless the over/under was set at 21 you take the under and that would be the easiest bet in the history of betting.

Michigan at -6 makes that look like trying to pick the number of a roulette wheel.

There is no logical/rational case you can make for UW to cover that w/ a offense that isn't even one dimensional it's zero.

chuck

As I posted in another thread, a moral victory of epic proportions is all set up now. Take UW and the points. *We will be in this one to the end, but the lack of depth and quality at receiver will ultimately prevent an outright win.

Edit...I should add thst the inability to hit a field goal longer than 30 yards will also be too great an obstacle to overcome. "We were a field goal or a ig play receiver away from pulling the upset in Ann Arbor" will be the rallying cry going into Arky State.

FremontTroll

DerekJohnson said:

I have only bet on football at two different tims in the past 20 years. Once was January 2020 when I thought Lamar Jackson was a sure thing in the playoffs to cover. I won the first bet but the following weekend I lost. The other time was during the OwenTwelve season of 2008. The Huskies would be playing USC as 42 point underdogs, and I would go "there's no way UW covers that". And they would be 24 point underdogs to so-and-so and I'd be like "There's no way they're gonna cover that." I won bets four or five weeks in a row before I cashed out.

Today I just bet $200 that Michigan will cover -6

I actually think the Dwags might put up a fight for the first half. But there's no way they don't lose double digits.

UW+6 confirmed lock.

backthepack

1.2k on michigan -6.5 and 200 on under.

RaceBannon

I don't have the GUTS to say it to my bookies face. The line seems so out of touch that it scares me

ramenduck

Fupdate:

Congrats to all this weekend’s investors.

RoadTrip

ramenduck said:

Fupdate:

Congrats to all this weekend’s investors.

And the under 49, Michigan -6.5 2 team parlay was also a lock

RaceBannon

Is it too late to bet?