Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

FDA approves Pfizer vaccine

13

Comments

  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,890
    jecornel said:

    The only silver lining potential is the willingness to use Ivermectin? Since there isn't the "emergency approval" getting in the way of other treatments. This expedited process? Hoping that people will get their, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th jab, and so on. Though, it doesn't appear the jab does much against Delta.

    Allegedly, there are 38.7 million cases and roughly 130 million undocumented cases. So approaching half the country being exposed if not more? How long now has the alleged deaths hovering 600+ (628,000)? Since last year. Deaths are way down and hopefully, the counting process is more accurate by not including car accidents. They should report true Covid cases. How hard is it to categorize? Or do they prefer to cause fear and chaos?


    Cases (reported) as a metric is worthless without a reliable estimate of those who are at any point asymptomatic and aren’t being tested and therefore not counted as a positive case
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,890

    MelloDawg said:

    I’m just here to see the goalposts move.

    I've not seen many people saying "it's not FDA approved" as their reason. I'm not getting any COVID shot because there is no long-term track record associated with it. And it's also proving to not work all that well as time goes by.
    More power to you for making your own choice …

    But that’s fucktarded logic

    Unless you’re someone that doesn’t adopt anything “new” because you don’t know long term effects it’s fairly selective reasoning
  • LebamDawgLebamDawg Member Posts: 8,716 Standard Supporter
    Tequilla said:

    MelloDawg said:

    I’m just here to see the goalposts move.

    I've not seen many people saying "it's not FDA approved" as their reason. I'm not getting any COVID shot because there is no long-term track record associated with it. And it's also proving to not work all that well as time goes by.
    More power to you for making your own choice …

    But that’s fucktarded logic

    Unless you’re someone that doesn’t adopt anything “new” because you don’t know long term effects it’s fairly selective reasoning
    Hard to understand some of that logic. Buy a first year new car then wait to see if the model can make it to year two? People get new things based on track record of a company or a product.

    When it comes to the human body I am very leery of trying anything new.

    That is not a fucktarded way to look at things. Since 1995 they have been trying mRNA vaccines and NONE have been approved, now a vaccine that appears to not work until the 3rd shot and then only deflecting a little of the symptoms get approved get jabbed? no thanks.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,972 Standard Supporter
    HuskyJW said:

    Look at the # of cases curve on Worldometer. During the two months of Nov & Dec 2020, cases doubled from 10 million to 20 million, without nurses and healthcare workers screeching for relief and condemning their patients.

    In the last two months, cases have risen by 4 million, and nurses' heads are exploding.

    Does anyone see a problem here?
    They’re tired and want to treat people that don’t deserve to be sick?
    Well fuck them, then. It's their fucking job. If they can't stand the heat, GTFO of the kitchen.

    Heroes? My Fucking Ass.
  • LebamDawgLebamDawg Member Posts: 8,716 Standard Supporter

    HuskyJW said:

    Look at the # of cases curve on Worldometer. During the two months of Nov & Dec 2020, cases doubled from 10 million to 20 million, without nurses and healthcare workers screeching for relief and condemning their patients.

    In the last two months, cases have risen by 4 million, and nurses' heads are exploding.

    Does anyone see a problem here?
    They’re tired and want to treat people that don’t deserve to be sick?
    Then don’t become a fucking nurse
    don't become a nurse, a fucking nurse is OK -
  • doogiedoogie Member Posts: 15,072
    The traveling nurses we encountered in the San Juan’s last week absolutely love their jobs and give zero fucks about the Trumped up panic.

    FWIW
  • RoadTripRoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,822 Founders Club
    HuskyJW said:

    Look at the # of cases curve on Worldometer. During the two months of Nov & Dec 2020, cases doubled from 10 million to 20 million, without nurses and healthcare workers screeching for relief and condemning their patients.

    In the last two months, cases have risen by 4 million, and nurses' heads are exploding.

    Does anyone see a problem here?
    They’re tired and want to treat people that don’t deserve to be sick?
    I hope you die
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,890
    LebamDawg said:

    Tequilla said:

    MelloDawg said:

    I’m just here to see the goalposts move.

    I've not seen many people saying "it's not FDA approved" as their reason. I'm not getting any COVID shot because there is no long-term track record associated with it. And it's also proving to not work all that well as time goes by.
    More power to you for making your own choice …

    But that’s fucktarded logic

    Unless you’re someone that doesn’t adopt anything “new” because you don’t know long term effects it’s fairly selective reasoning
    Hard to understand some of that logic. Buy a first year new car then wait to see if the model can make it to year two? People get new things based on track record of a company or a product.

    When it comes to the human body I am very leery of trying anything new.

    That is not a fucktarded way to look at things. Since 1995 they have been trying mRNA vaccines and NONE have been approved, now a vaccine that appears to not work until the 3rd shot and then only deflecting a little of the symptoms get approved get jabbed? no thanks.
    New product/technology was my point

    I get the concern about putting things into my body … it’s a concern I share

    Like you said … this is something they’ve been working on for a while … so there’s the glass half empty it full approach

    Empty says they haven’t got the results prior to COVID so it’s really coincidental that they magically got it working

    Half full says the fact they weren’t starting from scratch allowed them the opportunity to accelerate and find a suitable blockage to the key element of the bad parts of COVID

    But I do think that the logic that this was just whipped up hap hazzardly is more inaccurate than not
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,933 Standard Supporter
    Utah how long are the standard vaccine trials? Years. I'll pass.
  • oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    edited August 2021
    Tequilla said:

    LebamDawg said:

    Tequilla said:

    MelloDawg said:

    I’m just here to see the goalposts move.

    I've not seen many people saying "it's not FDA approved" as their reason. I'm not getting any COVID shot because there is no long-term track record associated with it. And it's also proving to not work all that well as time goes by.
    More power to you for making your own choice …

    But that’s fucktarded logic

    Unless you’re someone that doesn’t adopt anything “new” because you don’t know long term effects it’s fairly selective reasoning
    Hard to understand some of that logic. Buy a first year new car then wait to see if the model can make it to year two? People get new things based on track record of a company or a product.

    When it comes to the human body I am very leery of trying anything new.

    That is not a fucktarded way to look at things. Since 1995 they have been trying mRNA vaccines and NONE have been approved, now a vaccine that appears to not work until the 3rd shot and then only deflecting a little of the symptoms get approved get jabbed? no thanks.
    New product/technology was my point

    I get the concern about putting things into my body … it’s a concern I share

    But I do think that the logic that this was just whipped up hap hazzardly is more inaccurate than not
    They've had these 'vaccines' prepped for decades, for this moment. In animal trials testing, every animal was killed by these so called vaccines, without exception.
  • trubluetrublue Member Posts: 3,042

    Tequilla said:

    LebamDawg said:

    Tequilla said:

    MelloDawg said:

    I’m just here to see the goalposts move.

    I've not seen many people saying "it's not FDA approved" as their reason. I'm not getting any COVID shot because there is no long-term track record associated with it. And it's also proving to not work all that well as time goes by.
    More power to you for making your own choice …

    But that’s fucktarded logic

    Unless you’re someone that doesn’t adopt anything “new” because you don’t know long term effects it’s fairly selective reasoning
    Hard to understand some of that logic. Buy a first year new car then wait to see if the model can make it to year two? People get new things based on track record of a company or a product.

    When it comes to the human body I am very leery of trying anything new.

    That is not a fucktarded way to look at things. Since 1995 they have been trying mRNA vaccines and NONE have been approved, now a vaccine that appears to not work until the 3rd shot and then only deflecting a little of the symptoms get approved get jabbed? no thanks.
    New product/technology was my point

    I get the concern about putting things into my body … it’s a concern I share

    But I do think that the logic that this was just whipped up hap hazzardly is more inaccurate than not
    They've had these 'vaccines' prepped for decades, for this moment. In animal trials testing, every animal was killed by these so called vaccines, without exception.
    Gotta link?
  • hardhathardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    edited September 2023
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,972 Standard Supporter
    hardhat said:

    MelloDawg said:

    I’m just here to see the goalposts move.

    "If the first ones didn't kill you" POTD.
  • Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,607 Swaye's Wigwam
    lol what a shit head.


  • Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,607 Swaye's Wigwam
    Tequilla said:

    LebamDawg said:

    Tequilla said:

    MelloDawg said:

    I’m just here to see the goalposts move.

    I've not seen many people saying "it's not FDA approved" as their reason. I'm not getting any COVID shot because there is no long-term track record associated with it. And it's also proving to not work all that well as time goes by.
    More power to you for making your own choice …

    But that’s fucktarded logic

    Unless you’re someone that doesn’t adopt anything “new” because you don’t know long term effects it’s fairly selective reasoning
    Hard to understand some of that logic. Buy a first year new car then wait to see if the model can make it to year two? People get new things based on track record of a company or a product.

    When it comes to the human body I am very leery of trying anything new.

    That is not a fucktarded way to look at things. Since 1995 they have been trying mRNA vaccines and NONE have been approved, now a vaccine that appears to not work until the 3rd shot and then only deflecting a little of the symptoms get approved get jabbed? no thanks.
    New product/technology was my point

    I get the concern about putting things into my body … it’s a concern I share

    Like you said … this is something they’ve been working on for a while … so there’s the glass half empty it full approach

    Empty says they haven’t got the results prior to COVID so it’s really coincidental that they magically got it working

    Half full says the fact they weren’t starting from scratch allowed them the opportunity to accelerate and find a suitable blockage to the key element of the bad parts of COVID

    But I do think that the logic that this was just whipped up hap hazzardly is more inaccurate than not
    Not the case.
  • Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,607 Swaye's Wigwam
    Still today, not a single person in the US has taken the vaccine that was approved. All a liability shell game, that one is on the scoreboard.
  • UW_Doog_BotUW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 15,828 Swaye's Wigwam
    MelloDawg said:

    MelloDawg said:

    I’m just here to see the goalposts move.

    I've not seen many people saying "it's not FDA approved" as their reason. I'm not getting any COVID shot because there is no long-term track record associated with it. And it's also proving to not work all that well as time goes by.
    I support your right to have that choice.
    Moral high ground potd.
Sign In or Register to comment.