After you donate to Hardcore Husky, go donate to Joe Kent for Congress

AtomicPiss

I just made a donation to his campaign.


https://joekentforcongress.com

HHusky

#SaneRepublicansMustGo!

MelloDawg

Far left…far left…radical left…mainstream media…far left…widespread election irregularities.

Quite the drinking game he has going there.

TurdBomber

MelloDawg said:

Far left…far left…radical left…mainstream media…far left…widespread election irregularities.

Quite the drinking game he has going there.

When you know for a fact there was fraud, you use phrases like "No Widespread Fraud" to make the actual fraud seem normal, minimal, acceptable and okay.

And it obviously works on the Mello's of the world.

MelloDawg

TurdBomber said:

MelloDawg said:

Far left…far left…radical left…mainstream media…far left…widespread election irregularities.

Quite the drinking game he has going there.

When you know for a fact there was fraud, you use phrases like "No Widespread Fraud" to make the actual fraud seem normal, minimal, acceptable and okay.

And it obviously works on the Mello's of the world.

I don’t think that’s why they’re quantifying the amount of fraud.

TurdBomber

MelloDawg said:

TurdBomber said:

MelloDawg said:

Far left…far left…radical left…mainstream media…far left…widespread election irregularities.

Quite the drinking game he has going there.

When you know for a fact there was fraud, you use phrases like "No Widespread Fraud" to make the actual fraud seem normal, minimal, acceptable and okay.

And it obviously works on the Mello's of the world.

I don’t think that’s why they’re quantifying the amount of fraud.

Show me where and when they are "quantifying the amount of fraud" with that phrase.

Just let me grab my popcorn first. This should be amazing.

Rubberfist

TurdBomber said:

MelloDawg said:

Far left…far left…radical left…mainstream media…far left…widespread election irregularities.

Quite the drinking game he has going there.

When you know for a fact there was fraud, you use phrases like "No Widespread Fraud" to make the actual fraud seem normal, minimal, acceptable and okay.

And it obviously works on the Mello's of the world.

There is fraud in every election. Show me an election where there hasn’t been fraud. There was fraud in the 2016 election. Any system that has 150+ million people voting is going to have some people committing fraud.

To date, there is zero evidence that fraud took place to a degree that had any impact what so ever on the results. So to say that it wasn’t widespread is just being factually correct because we all read the article about the dude who muderred his wife and then used her vote to vote for Trump. So we all know about one dude who committed fraud.

PurpleThrobber

Rubberfist said:

TurdBomber said:

MelloDawg said:

Far left…far left…radical left…mainstream media…far left…widespread election irregularities.

Quite the drinking game he has going there.

When you know for a fact there was fraud, you use phrases like "No Widespread Fraud" to make the actual fraud seem normal, minimal, acceptable and okay.

And it obviously works on the Mello's of the world.

There is fraud in every election. Show me an election where there hasn’t been fraud. There was fraud in the 2016 election. Any system that has 150+ million people voting is going to have some people committing fraud.

To date, there is zero evidence that fraud took place to a degree that had any impact what so ever on the results. So to say that it wasn’t widespread is just being factually correct because we all read the article about the dude who muderred his wife and then used her vote to vote for Trump. So we all know about one dude who committed fraud.

Everybody does it POTD.

RaceBannon

From no fraud to sure there was fraud but not enough and 2016!!!!

HHusky

PurpleThrobber said:

Rubberfist said:

TurdBomber said:

MelloDawg said:

Far left…far left…radical left…mainstream media…far left…widespread election irregularities.

Quite the drinking game he has going there.

When you know for a fact there was fraud, you use phrases like "No Widespread Fraud" to make the actual fraud seem normal, minimal, acceptable and okay.

And it obviously works on the Mello's of the world.

There is fraud in every election. Show me an election where there hasn’t been fraud. There was fraud in the 2016 election. Any system that has 150+ million people voting is going to have some people committing fraud.

To date, there is zero evidence that fraud took place to a degree that had any impact what so ever on the results. So to say that it wasn’t widespread is just being factually correct because we all read the article about the dude who muderred his wife and then used her vote to vote for Trump. So we all know about one dude who committed fraud.

Everybody does it POTD.

We can't get Republicans to stop voting the ballots of their dead moms or the wives they've murdered. But it's not a lot of votes.

TurdBomber

Rubberfist said:

TurdBomber said:

MelloDawg said:

Far left…far left…radical left…mainstream media…far left…widespread election irregularities.

Quite the drinking game he has going there.

When you know for a fact there was fraud, you use phrases like "No Widespread Fraud" to make the actual fraud seem normal, minimal, acceptable and okay.

And it obviously works on the Mello's of the world.

There is fraud in every election. Show me an election where there hasn’t been fraud. There was fraud in the 2016 election. Any system that has 150+ million people voting is going to have some people committing fraud.

To date, there is zero evidence that fraud took place to a degree that had any impact what so ever on the results. So to say that it wasn’t widespread is just being factually correct because we all read the article about the dude who muderred his wife and then used her vote to vote for Trump. So we all know about one dude who committed fraud.

So we have not one, but two illiterate lefty lib morons who think "widespread" is a quantity.

Time to refill my popcorn.

RaceBannon

TurdBomber said:

Rubberfist said:

TurdBomber said:

MelloDawg said:

Far left…far left…radical left…mainstream media…far left…widespread election irregularities.

Quite the drinking game he has going there.

When you know for a fact there was fraud, you use phrases like "No Widespread Fraud" to make the actual fraud seem normal, minimal, acceptable and okay.

And it obviously works on the Mello's of the world.

There is fraud in every election. Show me an election where there hasn’t been fraud. There was fraud in the 2016 election. Any system that has 150+ million people voting is going to have some people committing fraud.

To date, there is zero evidence that fraud took place to a degree that had any impact what so ever on the results. So to say that it wasn’t widespread is just being factually correct because we all read the article about the dude who muderred his wife and then used her vote to vote for Trump. So we all know about one dude who committed fraud.

So we have not one, but two illiterate lefty lib morons who think "widespread" is a quantity.

Time to refill my popcorn.

The starters went home

The scrubs are finishing out the blow out loss

Pitchfork51

Will he send me a bottle opener?

AtomicPiss

Pitchfork51 said:

Will he send me a bottle opener?

Fork, did you receive yours?

Pitchfork51

DerekJohnson said:

Pitchfork51 said:

Will he send me a bottle opener?

Fork, did you receive yours?

Haven't checked the mail tbh

LoneStarDawg

Nobody fucking knows what happens, but only one group doesn’t want to open any books

If you have 81M votes you would want to parade them around as much as possible.

TurdBomber

RaceBannon said:

TurdBomber said:

Rubberfist said:

TurdBomber said:

MelloDawg said:

Far left…far left…radical left…mainstream media…far left…widespread election irregularities.

Quite the drinking game he has going there.

When you know for a fact there was fraud, you use phrases like "No Widespread Fraud" to make the actual fraud seem normal, minimal, acceptable and okay.

And it obviously works on the Mello's of the world.

There is fraud in every election. Show me an election where there hasn’t been fraud. There was fraud in the 2016 election. Any system that has 150+ million people voting is going to have some people committing fraud.

To date, there is zero evidence that fraud took place to a degree that had any impact what so ever on the results. So to say that it wasn’t widespread is just being factually correct because we all read the article about the dude who muderred his wife and then used her vote to vote for Trump. So we all know about one dude who committed fraud.

So we have not one, but two illiterate lefty lib morons who think "widespread" is a quantity.

Time to refill my popcorn.

The starters went home

The scrubs are finishing out the blow out loss

Well it is Friday.

And the environment is target-rich.

Rubberfist

TurdBomber said:

Rubberfist said:

TurdBomber said:

MelloDawg said:

Far left…far left…radical left…mainstream media…far left…widespread election irregularities.

Quite the drinking game he has going there.

When you know for a fact there was fraud, you use phrases like "No Widespread Fraud" to make the actual fraud seem normal, minimal, acceptable and okay.

And it obviously works on the Mello's of the world.

There is fraud in every election. Show me an election where there hasn’t been fraud. There was fraud in the 2016 election. Any system that has 150+ million people voting is going to have some people committing fraud.

To date, there is zero evidence that fraud took place to a degree that had any impact what so ever on the results. So to say that it wasn’t widespread is just being factually correct because we all read the article about the dude who muderred his wife and then used her vote to vote for Trump. So we all know about one dude who committed fraud.

So we have not one, but two illiterate lefty lib morons who think "widespread" is a quantity.

Time to refill my popcorn.

The Trump voter who murdered his wife and voted for her was caught and is being charged for murder AND voter fraud so I guess the system works.

TurdBomber

Rubberfist said:

TurdBomber said:

Rubberfist said:

TurdBomber said:

MelloDawg said:

Far left…far left…radical left…mainstream media…far left…widespread election irregularities.

Quite the drinking game he has going there.

When you know for a fact there was fraud, you use phrases like "No Widespread Fraud" to make the actual fraud seem normal, minimal, acceptable and okay.

And it obviously works on the Mello's of the world.

There is fraud in every election. Show me an election where there hasn’t been fraud. There was fraud in the 2016 election. Any system that has 150+ million people voting is going to have some people committing fraud.

To date, there is zero evidence that fraud took place to a degree that had any impact what so ever on the results. So to say that it wasn’t widespread is just being factually correct because we all read the article about the dude who muderred his wife and then used her vote to vote for Trump. So we all know about one dude who committed fraud.

So we have not one, but two illiterate lefty lib morons who think "widespread" is a quantity.

Time to refill my popcorn.

The Trump voter who murdered his wife and voted for her was caught and is being charged for murder AND voter fraud so I guess the system works.

Took you that long to come up with that? Wow.

How shall I quantify your libtard response?

HuskyJW

DerekJohnson said:

I just made a donation to his campaign.


https://joekentforcongress.com

Waste of money

On both fronts

AtomicPiss

LoneStarDawg said:

Nobody fucking knows what happens, but only one group doesn’t want to open any books

If you have 81M votes you would want to parade them around as much as possible.

"The wicked flee when no man pursues: but the righteous are bold as a lion." Exodus 11:8