'They aren't tiny, tiny details to us... they're the difference between winning and losing'

sarktastic

God, I love Peterman.

(Radio interview on ESPN Seattle between 1-2 pm today)

EsophagealFeces

I can't even put it into words how good it feels to have a coach that actually understands what it takes to win.

GrundleStiltzkin

Lossless .OGG link or it didn't happen.

Dardanus

I always thought the keys to success were ignoring the O-Line, Special Teams, and penalties. Just focus on WRs with talent, and talk a big game in the off-season.

EsophagealFeces

Offseason Natty Three-Peat!

DeepPurple

I'll be curious to see how Pete plays out compared to Rick. I thought Rick had a lot of potential after the RB win, but that loss at Michigan due to too many guys on the field... and the meltdown against Texas in the Holiday Bowl really set back my view of Rick... just didn't seem to have the attention to detail that James had... and that it sounds like Pete has.

EsophagealFeces

DeepPurple said:

I'll be curious to see how Pete plays out compared to Rick. I thought Rick had a lot of potential after the RB win, but that loss at Michigan due to too many guys on the field... and the meltdown against Texas in the Holiday Bowl really set back my view of Rick... just didn't seem to have the attention to detail that James had... and that it sounds like Pete has.

I think Peterman is a lot closer to James than he is to Rick. Not the most charismatic, but sincere, detail oriented, and most importantly: a winner.

DeepPurple

EsophagealFeces said:

DeepPurple said:

I'll be curious to see how Pete plays out compared to Rick. I thought Rick had a lot of potential after the RB win, but that loss at Michigan due to too many guys on the field... and the meltdown against Texas in the Holiday Bowl really set back my view of Rick... just didn't seem to have the attention to detail that James had... and that it sounds like Pete has.

I think Peterman is a lot closer to James than he is to Rick. Not the most charismatic, but sincere, detail oriented, and most importantly: a winner.

Yes indeed. As I've said before, after sitting out 3 entire coaching regimes, I'll probably get season tickets again.

Passion

EsophagealFeces said:

I can't even put it into words how good it feels to have a coach that actually understands what it takes to win consistently.

Fixed.

CuntWaffle

Ty was into the small details, probably due to limited access he gave the media, and we all know how that turned out.

Again please don't twist my words or anything, I think Peterman was a great hire, but people should be allowed to openly criticize him.

tracker

Oh, sure. .you can win a lot of games by paying attention to details but will our players still be able to, "Play Fast, Be Free?"

SweatpantsGeneral

mynorthwest.com/category/pod_player_sports/?a=9968636&p=1014&n=Bob%20and%20Groz%20Show

[Deleted User]

Sark paid attention to details. I mean he did bring in a tiger to prepare for LSU.

Sure the score was 41-3 but that score wasn't indicative of the game.

puppylove_sugarsteel

Fuck Rick was Bear Bryant smash mouth compared to Sark. And Ricky was a penny loafer wearing California faggot. Petersen doesn't have to do much to be the best coach UW has ever had.

LouieLouie

Dardanus said:

I always thought the keys to success were ignoring the O-Line, Special Teams, and penalties. Just focus on WRs with talent, and talk a big game in the off-season.

"We've looked into it and penalties have no effect on the chances of winning" - Steve Sarkisian

puppylove_sugarsteel

No disrespect to Don James, but Petersen could be more productive in shorter terms, in percentages respective to win-losses, major bowls, nfl draftees etc...Pete won't be here near as long as DJ, but he can make a bigger impact in relative measure. Shit maybe we can get 15 years out of Pete. I'd love to see these two matched up after a significant period of time. But this is apples to oranges as the times are so different . Forget I brought it up, let's talk about the 2 deeps some more or how good the players hips and biceps look

[Deleted User]

Unlike the Doogs I actually like Petersen's interviews more than Sark's. It feels more real and for the first time since Rick I actually get pumped listening to a UW coach.

[Deleted User]

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

Fuck Rick was Bear Bryant smash mouth compared to Sark. And Ricky was a penny loafer wearing California faggot. Petersen doesn't have to do much to be the best coach UW has ever had.

Gil Dobie???? Don James???

It would take quite a bit to be the best coach we've ever had.

Hopefully this is your brother again as this is fucktarded even by your piss poor standards.

Tequilla

I will give Slick credit in the sense that he clearly could find ways to motivate his players. I think he could win with a good staff around him. He was a good recruiter. He wasn't great at figuring out roster composition, etc. I think he also got a bit of a raw deal at UCLA because he started the turn around that Mora is riding right now. UCLA was borderline broken when Slick took on that job.

Petersen just strikes you as a guy that gets it. He gets how to win. He gets that it's important for everybody to be on the same page. He gets that the sum of the parts can be greater than the sum of the individual components. He has a track record of performance to indicate that he gets it.

Too often Sark failed in the sense that when watching his team the sum of the individuals was greater than the sum of the parts.

I know that I'm cautiously optimistic that we might see a great season this year.

sarktastic

Tequilla said:

Petersen just strikes you as a guy that gets it. ... He gets that the sum of the parts can be greater than the sum of the individual components....

Too often Sark failed in the sense that when watching his team the sum of the individuals was greater than the sum of the parts.

....

the fuck?

Tequilla

For the uneducated:

Petersen makes his team better

Sark makes his team worse