Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Pennsylvania Department of State Tells Counties Not to Allow Outside Access to Voting Systems

AtomicPissAtomicPiss Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 64,480 Founders Club
BY ZACHARY STIEBER
Epoch Times

The Pennsylvania agency in charge of elections has issued a new directive telling counties not to let outside parties access electronic voting systems or components of such systems, such as tabulators and ballot printers.

The directive from the Pennsylvania Department of State, released on July 9, states that county boards of elections “shall not” provide any access to third parties that are seeking to examine the systems or system components.

If the counties do allow access, the voting equipment that’s examined “will be considered no longer secure or reliable to use in subsequent elections,” and the department will withdraw its certification for the equipment.

“Such access by third parties undermines chain of custody requirements and strict access limitations necessary to prevent both intentional and inadvertent tampering with electronic voting systems,” Acting Pennsylvania Secretary of State Veronica Degraffenreid, appointed in February by Democrat Gov. Tom Wolf, said in a statement. “It also jeopardizes the security and integrity of the systems and will prevent electronic voting system vendors from affirming that the systems continue to meet Commonwealth security standards and U.S. Election Assistance Commission certification.”

Pennsylvania Senate President Pro Tempore Jake Corman, a Republican, said in a response that the directive “is an attack on the General Assembly’s power to review, investigate, and legislate in matters within its legislative authority, which includes Pennsylvania’s election system.”

“The Legislature has clear authority—both statutorily and constitutionally—to provide oversight and issue subpoenas. This directive tramples those rights which were specifically put in place to prevent potential abuses and overreach by the Executive Branch,” he said.

State Sen. Doug Mastriano, a Republican, added that the directive was an example of a “disturbing pattern” of obstruction and violation of constitutional powers of the state Senate by the Wolf administration that dates back to March 2019.

Wolf and other Pennsylvania executive branch officials have condemned the push by some state Republicans for an audit, saying the 2020 election ran smoothly with virtually no problems. Mastriano triggered a probe of recent elections last week, sending letters to Philadelphia, York, and Tioga counties.

Mastriano cited abnormalities in the election, including how the number of mail-in ballots increased by more than 2 million compared to four years prior and the acceptance of ballots that arrived after Election Day.

The chairman of the Senate Intergovernmental Operations Committee requested all ballot production, processing, and tabulation equipment that was used during the election, as well as forensic images of all election equipment and software from the equipment, according to the letter to Philadelphia County, which was obtained by The Epoch Times.

Officials were asked to provide the documents by July 31. If they don’t, then Mastriano plans to go to his committee and hold a vote that would give him the authority to issue subpoenas.

“Let’s just find out what happened and get to the bottom of it and do what we’ve got to do to either safeguard our elections or celebrate how perfect the election was,” Mastriano told The Epoch Times in a recent interview.

“The bottom line is, we’re always asking for transparency in government, constantly, and regardless of who won the election, last year was unparalleled in so many ways. And so, if there’s ever a time to do a forensic analysis of an electorate, this is the time to do it. There’s so many things that kind of were disruptive last year. And so, I don’t know why anyone could be opposed to this, unless you have something to hide.”

The Office of City Commissioners for Philadelphia confirmed to The Epoch Times in an emailed statement that it received the letter.

“Our office is reviewing it and [we] have no comment about the requests at this time. We do want to be clear, however, that Senator Mastriano’s letter reiterates claims about the November 2020 election that have been resoundingly rejected by courts. The repetition of baseless claims by elected officials poses a real challenge to our democratic processes. We are committed to continuing the hard work of ensuring that Philadelphians are able to exercise their right to vote,” the commissioners’ office stated.

York and Tioga county officials confirmed to The Epoch Times their receipt of Mastriano’s letter, but declined further comment.

Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro, a Democrat, has said he is prepared to try to block audits of voting equipment in court.

Mastriano visited the audit taking place in Maricopa County, Arizona, last month, and has said his investigation is aimed at going even deeper than that election review. He would like to hire the firms conducting the Arizona audit, pending support from Pennsylvania Senate Republican leadership.

The Pennsylvania Department of State noted that Maricopa County has opted to replace the machines that were examined by auditors. The department said it wouldn’t reimburse Pennsylvania counties for the cost of obtaining replacement equipment for which it withdraws certification if outside access is granted.

It also referenced an elections assessment that took place in Fulton County, Pennsylvania.

“We already have seen systems compromised in Fulton County and in the state of Arizona,” the agency said in a statement last week. “In both cases, the politically motivated reviews turned up absolutely no evidence of any fraud or discrepancies. Those partisan exercises did, however, prove to be very costly for local officials and taxpayers when election administrators were forced to lease or purchase replacement equipment.”
«1

Comments

  • doogiedoogie Member Posts: 15,072
    And PA Senate says Hold My Beer
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,423 Standard Supporter
    He seems worried. If anyone recalls the machines are NEVER supposed to be connected to the internet yet they were in every state in question. Strange.
  • SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,536 Founders Club
    What's the argument for why we shouldn't have a forensic examination of the ballots and results? I'm genuinely curious what the Dem logic is here? If you believe your results are legit just do the audit and then say "see losers we told you!" Obstructionist tactics are a bad look. What am I missing?
  • LoneStarDawgLoneStarDawg Member Posts: 13,536
    Swaye said:

    What's the argument for why we shouldn't have a forensic examination of the ballots and results? I'm genuinely curious what the Dem logic is here? If you believe your results are legit just do the audit and then say "see losers we told you!" Obstructionist tactics are a bad look. What am I missing?

    When UW wins bigly I know I like watching the game over and over, not get it taken off youtube. Why not revel in the victory?
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,423 Standard Supporter
    Joe didn't win and they know they cheated. It's like blocking instant replays on turnovers and trying a quick snap when you know you're fucked obj the replay.
  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,068
    Swaye said:

    What's the argument for why we shouldn't have a forensic examination of the ballots and results? I'm genuinely curious what the Dem logic is here? If you believe your results are legit just do the audit and then say "see losers we told you!" Obstructionist tactics are a bad look. What am I missing?

    Whatever commie
  • RubberfistRubberfist Member Posts: 1,373
    Swaye said:

    What's the argument for why we shouldn't have a forensic examination of the ballots and results? I'm genuinely curious what the Dem logic is here? If you believe your results are legit just do the audit and then say "see losers we told you!" Obstructionist tactics are a bad look. What am I missing?

    If it’s anything like the AZ “audit” its only purpose is to poison the well. The AZ “audit” is a complete clown show where they were searching ballots for bamboo fiber because internet conspiracy theories said China flew in thousands of fake ballots and everyone knows that everything from China has…bamboo on it.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,575 Founders Club

    Swaye said:

    What's the argument for why we shouldn't have a forensic examination of the ballots and results? I'm genuinely curious what the Dem logic is here? If you believe your results are legit just do the audit and then say "see losers we told you!" Obstructionist tactics are a bad look. What am I missing?

    If it’s anything like the AZ “audit” its only purpose is to poison the well. The AZ “audit” is a complete clown show where they were searching ballots for bamboo fiber because internet conspiracy theories said China flew in thousands of fake ballots and everyone knows that everything from China has…bamboo on it.
    Speaking of bullshit
  • RubberfistRubberfist Member Posts: 1,373

    Swaye said:

    What's the argument for why we shouldn't have a forensic examination of the ballots and results? I'm genuinely curious what the Dem logic is here? If you believe your results are legit just do the audit and then say "see losers we told you!" Obstructionist tactics are a bad look. What am I missing?

    If it’s anything like the AZ “audit” its only purpose is to poison the well. The AZ “audit” is a complete clown show where they were searching ballots for bamboo fiber because internet conspiracy theories said China flew in thousands of fake ballots and everyone knows that everything from China has…bamboo on it.
    Speaking of bullshit
    Explain. Every bit of it is true.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,423 Standard Supporter

    Swaye said:

    What's the argument for why we shouldn't have a forensic examination of the ballots and results? I'm genuinely curious what the Dem logic is here? If you believe your results are legit just do the audit and then say "see losers we told you!" Obstructionist tactics are a bad look. What am I missing?

    If it’s anything like the AZ “audit” its only purpose is to poison the well. The AZ “audit” is a complete clown show where they were searching ballots for bamboo fiber because internet conspiracy theories said China flew in thousands of fake ballots and everyone knows that everything from China has…bamboo on it.
    Speaking of bullshit
    Explain. Every bit of it is true.
    We've been over this. Madcow fed you Bullshit. You loved it.
  • RubberfistRubberfist Member Posts: 1,373
    Sledog said:

    Swaye said:

    What's the argument for why we shouldn't have a forensic examination of the ballots and results? I'm genuinely curious what the Dem logic is here? If you believe your results are legit just do the audit and then say "see losers we told you!" Obstructionist tactics are a bad look. What am I missing?

    If it’s anything like the AZ “audit” its only purpose is to poison the well. The AZ “audit” is a complete clown show where they were searching ballots for bamboo fiber because internet conspiracy theories said China flew in thousands of fake ballots and everyone knows that everything from China has…bamboo on it.
    Speaking of bullshit
    Explain. Every bit of it is true.
    We've been over this. Madcow fed you Bullshit. You loved it.
    Don’t watch Madcow. This came from this board’s favorite fake news site, Gateway Pundit.
  • MelloDawgMelloDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 6,753 Swaye's Wigwam

    Swaye said:

    What's the argument for why we shouldn't have a forensic examination of the ballots and results? I'm genuinely curious what the Dem logic is here? If you believe your results are legit just do the audit and then say "see losers we told you!" Obstructionist tactics are a bad look. What am I missing?

    If it’s anything like the AZ “audit” its only purpose is to poison the well. The AZ “audit” is a complete clown show where they were searching ballots for bamboo fiber because internet conspiracy theories said China flew in thousands of fake ballots and everyone knows that everything from China has…bamboo on it.
    My understanding is that once all the audits are complete, we’ll find out Trump won all the swing states. Every Facebook meme, Gateway Pundit op-ed and some tweets written all in caps say so.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,575 Founders Club

    Swaye said:

    What's the argument for why we shouldn't have a forensic examination of the ballots and results? I'm genuinely curious what the Dem logic is here? If you believe your results are legit just do the audit and then say "see losers we told you!" Obstructionist tactics are a bad look. What am I missing?

    If it’s anything like the AZ “audit” its only purpose is to poison the well. The AZ “audit” is a complete clown show where they were searching ballots for bamboo fiber because internet conspiracy theories said China flew in thousands of fake ballots and everyone knows that everything from China has…bamboo on it.
    Speaking of bullshit
    Explain. Every bit of it is true.
    One born every minute
  • trubluetrublue Member Posts: 3,042

    Swaye said:

    What's the argument for why we shouldn't have a forensic examination of the ballots and results? I'm genuinely curious what the Dem logic is here? If you believe your results are legit just do the audit and then say "see losers we told you!" Obstructionist tactics are a bad look. What am I missing?

    If it’s anything like the AZ “audit” its only purpose is to poison the well. The AZ “audit” is a complete clown show where they were searching ballots for bamboo fiber because internet conspiracy theories said China flew in thousands of fake ballots and everyone knows that everything from China has…bamboo on it.
    Link?
  • doogiedoogie Member Posts: 15,072

    Swaye said:

    What's the argument for why we shouldn't have a forensic examination of the ballots and results? I'm genuinely curious what the Dem logic is here? If you believe your results are legit just do the audit and then say "see losers we told you!" Obstructionist tactics are a bad look. What am I missing?

    If it’s anything like the AZ “audit” its only purpose is to poison the well. The AZ “audit” is a complete clown show where they were searching ballots for bamboo fiber because internet conspiracy theories said China flew in thousands of fake ballots and everyone knows that everything from China has…bamboo on it.
    Why do you blatantly lie about what is happening in Arizona?
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,575 Founders Club
    Former President Donald Trump has released a letter from an ex federal prosecutor in Pennsylvania stating that he disagreed with former Attorney General William Barr on how to deal with allegations of voter fraud and election irregularities, the Washington Examiner has reported.

    William McSwain, who was U.S. attorney of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania from 2018 until January 2021, wrote to Trump expressing his disapproval of instructions he said he received from Barr.

    "On Election Day and afterwards, our Office received various allegations of voter fraud and election irregularities," the letter said. "As part of my responsibilities as U.S. Attorney, I wanted to be transparent with the public and, of course, investigate fully any allegations. Attorney General Barr, however, instructed me not to make any public statements or put out any press releases regarding possible election irregularities. I was also given a directive to pass along serious allegations to the State Attorney General for investigation - the same State Attorney General who had already declared that you could not win."

    McSwain was referring to Democrat Josh Shapiro, then-Attorney General of Pennsylvania, who said at the time that the state found "absolutely no evidence" of what Trump claimed was widespread "voter fraud," Sputnik reported. Days before the November election, Shapiro tweeted that "Trump is going to lose."



    Is Barr the worst wingman ever? Anyone heard from Durham?
  • trubluetrublue Member Posts: 3,042
    trublue said:

    Swaye said:

    What's the argument for why we shouldn't have a forensic examination of the ballots and results? I'm genuinely curious what the Dem logic is here? If you believe your results are legit just do the audit and then say "see losers we told you!" Obstructionist tactics are a bad look. What am I missing?

    If it’s anything like the AZ “audit” its only purpose is to poison the well. The AZ “audit” is a complete clown show where they were searching ballots for bamboo fiber because internet conspiracy theories said China flew in thousands of fake ballots and everyone knows that everything from China has…bamboo on it.
    Link?
    Bump
Sign In or Register to comment.