Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Bikini Bottom Pole (2nd attempt)
YellowSnow
Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,331 
Bikini Bottom Pole (2nd attempt) 22 votes
Cheeky Bottoms
59%
13 votes
Traditional / Full
40%
9 votes
Comments
-
Traditional / FullSomething is fucky with Vanilla, so I deleted the first pole and seeing if a do-over resolves the issue.
@dnc @RaceBannon @PurpleThrobber @chuck -
Traditional / FullMy vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.
-
Traditional / Full
It's a binary pole. Cheeky vs Non Cheeky.chuck said:My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.
So here's my take take: 81% of the women I see wearing cheeky bottoms have no fucking bidness going full cheek and it yucks me out. Therefore, for the good of society, we need to return to the puritanical, full bottoms. -
I just keep getting this
-
Traditional / Full
I've seen some bikini bottoms recently that looked way scarier than that. Modesty has suffered a setback in this heat.RaceBannon said:I just keep getting this
-
YellowSnow said:
Something is fucky with Vanilla, so I deleted the first pole and seeing if a do-over resolves the issue.
@dnc @RaceBannon @PurpleThrobber @chuck
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oai1V7kaFBk -
-
Traditional / Full
In defense of those ladies, women’s fashion and stores tend to force a particular cut or style of garment down your throat whether you like it or not, body type be dammed. I remember when super low rise jeans were all the rage. It was fucking impossible to find any mid-rise (read “normal”) pairs ANYWHERE unless you went for some older brand.YellowSnow said:
It's a binary pole. Cheeky vs Non Cheeky.chuck said:My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.
So here's my take take: 81% of the women I see wearing cheeky bottoms have no fucking bidness going full cheek and it yucks me out. Therefore, for the good of society, we need to return to the puritanical, full bottoms.
It’s the same thing with swimwear I imagine.
I’m just waiting for this look to come back.
-
Traditional / Full
I appreciate what you're saying DDJ, but surely there have to be other options out there besides cheeky bottoms? Are there not plenty of one piece bathing suits options out there?Doog_de_Jour said:
In defense of those ladies, women’s fashion and stores tend to force a particular cut or style of garment down your throat whether you like it or not, body type be dammed. I remember when super low rise jeans were all the rage. It was fucking impossible to find any mid-rise (read “normal”) pairs ANYWHERE unless you went for some older brand.YellowSnow said:
It's a binary pole. Cheeky vs Non Cheeky.chuck said:My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.
So here's my take take: 81% of the women I see wearing cheeky bottoms have no fucking bidness going full cheek and it yucks me out. Therefore, for the good of society, we need to return to the puritanical, full bottoms.
It’s the same thing with swimwear I imagine.
I’m just waiting for this look to come back. -
Traditional / FullI guess Depends is not an option?
-
-
Traditional / Full
#MeToochuck said:My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.
-
Traditional / Full
So @DerekJohnson I have failed you. Last weekend as we were getting ready to launch our inner tubes into the Wakanda River, there was a gaggle of (I think) Korean chicks all in cheeky bottoms getting ready to embark. Had wife and kids with me so no pics. I don't know if you could have maintained comportment with such scenery.DerekJohnson said:
#MeToochuck said:My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.
-
Traditional / FullYellowSnow said:
So @DerekJohnson I have failed you. Last weekend as we were getting ready to launch our inner tubes into the Wakanda River, there was a gaggle of (I think) Korean chicks all in cheeky bottoms getting ready to embark. Had wife and kids with me so no pics. I don't know if you could have maintained comportment with such scenery.DerekJohnson said:
#MeToochuck said:My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.
-
WOOD!Doog_de_Jour said:
In defense of those ladies, women’s fashion and stores tend to force a particular cut or style of garment down your throat whether you like it or not, body type be dammed. I remember when super low rise jeans were all the rage. It was fucking impossible to find any mid-rise (read “normal”) pairs ANYWHERE unless you went for some older brand.YellowSnow said:
It's a binary pole. Cheeky vs Non Cheeky.chuck said:My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.
So here's my take take: 81% of the women I see wearing cheeky bottoms have no fucking bidness going full cheek and it yucks me out. Therefore, for the good of society, we need to return to the puritanical, full bottoms.
It’s the same thing with swimwear I imagine.
I’m just waiting for this look to come back. -
Cheeky BottomsGod I hate you geezers
-
Traditional / Full
Yes, there are lots of options online (and back in the day, catalog…oh how I loved it in my twenties when the first Victoria Secret Swim would arrive).YellowSnow said:
I appreciate what you're saying DDJ, but surely there have to be other options out there besides cheeky bottoms? Are there not plenty of one piece bathing suits options out there?Doog_de_Jour said:
In defense of those ladies, women’s fashion and stores tend to force a particular cut or style of garment down your throat whether you like it or not, body type be dammed. I remember when super low rise jeans were all the rage. It was fucking impossible to find any mid-rise (read “normal”) pairs ANYWHERE unless you went for some older brand.YellowSnow said:
It's a binary pole. Cheeky vs Non Cheeky.chuck said:My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.
So here's my take take: 81% of the women I see wearing cheeky bottoms have no fucking bidness going full cheek and it yucks me out. Therefore, for the good of society, we need to return to the puritanical, full bottoms.
It’s the same thing with swimwear I imagine.
I’m just waiting for this look to come back.
But sizing for swimwear is a royal bitch to figure out AND images aren’t always representative of what you actual end up getting.
And you’re right, there are some lovely one piece alternatives out there. I found this one on sale that provides full coverage:
Only downside is the weird tan lines. -
Victoria Secret then
Victoria Secret now
-
Cheeky Bottoms
This is the correct counterpoint.YellowSnow said:
It's a binary pole. Cheeky vs Non Cheeky.chuck said:My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.
So here's my take take: 81% of the women I see wearing cheeky bottoms have no fucking bidness going full cheek and it yucks me out. Therefore, for the good of society, we need to return to the puritanical, full bottoms. -
Traditional / Full
I thought it was a fair and balanced hot take.RoadDawg55 said:
This is the correct counterpoint.YellowSnow said:
It's a binary pole. Cheeky vs Non Cheeky.chuck said:My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.
So here's my take take: 81% of the women I see wearing cheeky bottoms have no fucking bidness going full cheek and it yucks me out. Therefore, for the good of society, we need to return to the puritanical, full bottoms. -
Traditional / Full
Yuck. Still probably a wood on the younger version of her wife.oregonblitzkrieg said:Victoria Secret then
Victoria Secret now -
Cheeky BottomsAs Yella says in a worst case scenario you take non-cheeky to err on the side of caution, but I've never been known for my caution and let's face it when done right cheeky is as good as it gets. So let's be bold and daring and hope the 300 pound ladies stick to the full cheeks.
-
This is the slow strategy, play-it-safe take. Never get too low, never get too high.YellowSnow said:
It's a binary pole. Cheeky vs Non Cheeky.chuck said:My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.
So here's my take take: 81% of the women I see wearing cheeky bottoms have no fucking bidness going full cheek and it yucks me out. Therefore, for the good of society, we need to return to the puritanical, full bottoms.
Squarely on brand. -
This is the fast strategy, maybe-I'll-get-AIDs-but-have-you-seen-her-she's-worth-it take.Swaye said:As Yella says in a worst case scenario you take non-cheeky to err on the side of caution, but I've never been known for my caution and let's face it when done right cheeky is as good as it gets. So let's be bold and daring and hope the 300 pound ladies stick to the full cheeks.
Squarely on brand.
-
Traditional / Full
Ironic that the biggest atheist fag of the board is so biased towards old timey, Judeo-Christian morality.dnc said:
This is the slow strategy, play-it-safe take. Never get too low, never get too high.YellowSnow said:
It's a binary pole. Cheeky vs Non Cheeky.chuck said:My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.
So here's my take take: 81% of the women I see wearing cheeky bottoms have no fucking bidness going full cheek and it yucks me out. Therefore, for the good of society, we need to return to the puritanical, full bottoms.
Squarely on brand. -
I wood not call you the biggest atheist on the bored. Tallest maybe.YellowSnow said:
Ironic that the biggest atheist fag of the board is so biased towards old timey, Judeo-Christian morality.dnc said:
This is the slow strategy, play-it-safe take. Never get too low, never get too high.YellowSnow said:
It's a binary pole. Cheeky vs Non Cheeky.chuck said:My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.
So here's my take take: 81% of the women I see wearing cheeky bottoms have no fucking bidness going full cheek and it yucks me out. Therefore, for the good of society, we need to return to the puritanical, full bottoms.
Squarely on brand. -
Traditional / Full
looking at that I don't see how anyone could be an atheist, tall? yes, atheist? noSwaye said:As Yella says in a worst case scenario you take non-cheeky to err on the side of caution, but I've never been known for my caution and let's face it when done right cheeky is as good as it gets. So let's be bold and daring and hope the 300 pound ladies stick to the full cheeks.
-
Cheeky Bottoms
Low rise is about 1000 times better than high rise.Doog_de_Jour said:
In defense of those ladies, women’s fashion and stores tend to force a particular cut or style of garment down your throat whether you like it or not, body type be dammed. I remember when super low rise jeans were all the rage. It was fucking impossible to find any mid-rise (read “normal”) pairs ANYWHERE unless you went for some older brand.YellowSnow said:
It's a binary pole. Cheeky vs Non Cheeky.chuck said:My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.
So here's my take take: 81% of the women I see wearing cheeky bottoms have no fucking bidness going full cheek and it yucks me out. Therefore, for the good of society, we need to return to the puritanical, full bottoms.
It’s the same thing with swimwear I imagine.
I’m just waiting for this look to come back. -
Traditional / Full
Darwin made those cheeks.LebamDawg said:
looking at that I don't see how anyone could be an atheist, tall? yes, atheist? noSwaye said:As Yella says in a worst case scenario you take non-cheeky to err on the side of caution, but I've never been known for my caution and let's face it when done right cheeky is as good as it gets. So let's be bold and daring and hope the 300 pound ladies stick to the full cheeks.
-
Is this a modified version of the Kirk Cameron divinely inspired banana theory?...LebamDawg said:
looking at that I don't see how anyone could be an atheist, tall? yes, atheist? noSwaye said:As Yella says in a worst case scenario you take non-cheeky to err on the side of caution, but I've never been known for my caution and let's face it when done right cheeky is as good as it gets. So let's be bold and daring and hope the 300 pound ladies stick to the full cheeks.
