Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Bikini Bottom Pole (2nd attempt)

YellowSnow
YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,331 Founders Club

Bikini Bottom Pole (2nd attempt) 22 votes

Cheeky Bottoms
59%
SwayeRoadDawg55LoneStarDawgYouKnowItalumni94TequillaBad_MotherDuckerhuskyhooliganGreenRiverGatorzspudenPitchfork51TheGhost206USMChawk 13 votes
Traditional / Full
40%
DerekJohnsonMad_SongreenbloodchuckFenderbender123LebamDawgDoog_de_JourYellowSnowBleachedAnusDawg 9 votes
«1

Comments

  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,331 Founders Club
    Traditional / Full
    Something is fucky with Vanilla, so I deleted the first pole and seeing if a do-over resolves the issue.

    @dnc @RaceBannon @PurpleThrobber @chuck
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,685 Swaye's Wigwam
    Traditional / Full
    My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,331 Founders Club
    Traditional / Full
    chuck said:

    My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.

    It's a binary pole. Cheeky vs Non Cheeky.

    So here's my take take: 81% of the women I see wearing cheeky bottoms have no fucking bidness going full cheek and it yucks me out. Therefore, for the good of society, we need to return to the puritanical, full bottoms.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,139 Founders Club
    I just keep getting this


  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,685 Swaye's Wigwam
    Traditional / Full

    I just keep getting this


    I've seen some bikini bottoms recently that looked way scarier than that. Modesty has suffered a setback in this heat.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,133 Standard Supporter

    Something is fucky with Vanilla, so I deleted the first pole and seeing if a do-over resolves the issue.

    @dnc @RaceBannon @PurpleThrobber @chuck

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oai1V7kaFBk
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,133 Standard Supporter

    I just keep getting this




    Rod was a skinny-dipping fan.

  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,331 Founders Club
    Traditional / Full

    chuck said:

    My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.

    It's a binary pole. Cheeky vs Non Cheeky.

    So here's my take take: 81% of the women I see wearing cheeky bottoms have no fucking bidness going full cheek and it yucks me out. Therefore, for the good of society, we need to return to the puritanical, full bottoms.
    In defense of those ladies, women’s fashion and stores tend to force a particular cut or style of garment down your throat whether you like it or not, body type be dammed. I remember when super low rise jeans were all the rage. It was fucking impossible to find any mid-rise (read “normal”) pairs ANYWHERE unless you went for some older brand.

    It’s the same thing with swimwear I imagine.

    I’m just waiting for this look to come back.


    I appreciate what you're saying DDJ, but surely there have to be other options out there besides cheeky bottoms? Are there not plenty of one piece bathing suits options out there?
  • LebamDawg
    LebamDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,792 Swaye's Wigwam
    Traditional / Full
    I guess Depends is not an option?

  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,543 Founders Club
    Traditional / Full
    chuck said:

    My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.

    #MeToo
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,133 Standard Supporter

    chuck said:

    My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.

    It's a binary pole. Cheeky vs Non Cheeky.

    So here's my take take: 81% of the women I see wearing cheeky bottoms have no fucking bidness going full cheek and it yucks me out. Therefore, for the good of society, we need to return to the puritanical, full bottoms.
    In defense of those ladies, women’s fashion and stores tend to force a particular cut or style of garment down your throat whether you like it or not, body type be dammed. I remember when super low rise jeans were all the rage. It was fucking impossible to find any mid-rise (read “normal”) pairs ANYWHERE unless you went for some older brand.

    It’s the same thing with swimwear I imagine.

    I’m just waiting for this look to come back.


    WOOD!
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,147
    Cheeky Bottoms

    chuck said:

    My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.

    It's a binary pole. Cheeky vs Non Cheeky.

    So here's my take take: 81% of the women I see wearing cheeky bottoms have no fucking bidness going full cheek and it yucks me out. Therefore, for the good of society, we need to return to the puritanical, full bottoms.
    This is the correct counterpoint.
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,331 Founders Club
    Traditional / Full

    chuck said:

    My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.

    It's a binary pole. Cheeky vs Non Cheeky.

    So here's my take take: 81% of the women I see wearing cheeky bottoms have no fucking bidness going full cheek and it yucks me out. Therefore, for the good of society, we need to return to the puritanical, full bottoms.
    This is the correct counterpoint.
    I thought it was a fair and balanced hot take.
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,331 Founders Club
    Traditional / Full

    Victoria Secret then



    Victoria Secret now

    Yuck. Still probably a wood on the younger version of her wife.
  • LebamDawg
    LebamDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,792 Swaye's Wigwam
    Traditional / Full
    Swaye said:

    As Yella says in a worst case scenario you take non-cheeky to err on the side of caution, but I've never been known for my caution and let's face it when done right cheeky is as good as it gets. So let's be bold and daring and hope the 300 pound ladies stick to the full cheeks.



    looking at that I don't see how anyone could be an atheist, tall? yes, atheist? no
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662
    Cheeky Bottoms

    chuck said:

    My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.

    It's a binary pole. Cheeky vs Non Cheeky.

    So here's my take take: 81% of the women I see wearing cheeky bottoms have no fucking bidness going full cheek and it yucks me out. Therefore, for the good of society, we need to return to the puritanical, full bottoms.
    In defense of those ladies, women’s fashion and stores tend to force a particular cut or style of garment down your throat whether you like it or not, body type be dammed. I remember when super low rise jeans were all the rage. It was fucking impossible to find any mid-rise (read “normal”) pairs ANYWHERE unless you went for some older brand.

    It’s the same thing with swimwear I imagine.

    I’m just waiting for this look to come back.


    Low rise is about 1000 times better than high rise.
  • 1to392831weretaken
    1to392831weretaken Member Posts: 7,696
    LebamDawg said:

    Swaye said:

    As Yella says in a worst case scenario you take non-cheeky to err on the side of caution, but I've never been known for my caution and let's face it when done right cheeky is as good as it gets. So let's be bold and daring and hope the 300 pound ladies stick to the full cheeks.



    looking at that I don't see how anyone could be an atheist, tall? yes, atheist? no
    Is this a modified version of the Kirk Cameron divinely inspired banana theory?...