Richard "Fig" Newton, Sean McGrew will be scary 1-2 punch

DerekJohnson

https://saturdayblitz.com/2021/06/23/washington-football-newton-mcgrew-scary-1-2-punch/

chuck

Here's a sample so others can be spared opening that link.

If we see Newton run 150-200 times and maintain his 5.3 yards per carry that he had in 2020, he should approach that 1,000-yard mark. McGrew will be somewhere in the 700-800 range if he isn’t far behind in carries and Davis should reach a few hundred as well.

CFetters_Nacho_Lover

Thanks Taft!

BleachedAnusDawg

Give Davis 250 carries.

FireCohen

Newton is not the same after that furd game

greenblood

Run the damn ball in full effect

DerekJohnson

chuck said:

Here's a sample so others can be spared opening that link.

If we see Newton run 150-200 times and maintain his 5.3 yards per carry that he had in 2020, he should approach that 1,000-yard mark. McGrew will be somewhere in the 700-800 range if he isn’t far behind in carries and Davis should reach a few hundred as well.

So you're saying that if the Huskies score more points than their opponents they will win the game?

CFetters_Nacho_Lover

DerekJohnson said:

chuck said:

Here's a sample so others can be spared opening that link.

If we see Newton run 150-200 times and maintain his 5.3 yards per carry that he had in 2020, he should approach that 1,000-yard mark. McGrew will be somewhere in the 700-800 range if he isn’t far behind in carries and Davis should reach a few hundred as well.

So you're saying that if the Huskies score more points than their opponents they will win the game?

I think this theory could work well in Jimmy Lakes favor in 2021

RaceBannon

CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

DerekJohnson said:

chuck said:

Here's a sample so others can be spared opening that link.

If we see Newton run 150-200 times and maintain his 5.3 yards per carry that he had in 2020, he should approach that 1,000-yard mark. McGrew will be somewhere in the 700-800 range if he isn’t far behind in carries and Davis should reach a few hundred as well.

So you're saying that if the Huskies score more points than their opponents they will win the game?

I think this theory could work well in Jimmy Lakes favor in 2021

I can't wait to go 15-0 and win the natty only to hear that Jimmy only won with Petersen's players

#SCRIPT

MikeDamone

I coined the nickname “Fig” Newton a couple years ago. Don’t forget that.

DerekJohnson

MikeDamone said:

I coined the nickname “Fig” Newton a couple years ago. Don’t forget that.

Disagree

PostGameOrangeSlices

Fuck anyone who says Newton shouldn't be the feature back. He is by far the most proven and runs the hardest.

But yeah, Davis and his 30 fucking yards from scrimmage should be the bell cow....get the fuck out of here

Good luck the rest of the way

HuskyJW

Big Dick Newton?

HairyBallsDawg

https://twitter.com/UW_Football/status/1388596056636624897

He looks good here. But it is hard to say if this means he'll have a good year, or if it means our D still sucks against the run.

Canadawg

None a yall know which RB is going to be good. All flashes so far

PostGameOrangeSlices

Canadawg said:

None a yall know which RB is going to be good. All flashes so far

Newton is a proven hard runner and McGrew is a good change of pace back. The article is dead on...

AtomicDawg

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

Canadawg said:

None a yall know which RB is going to be good. All flashes so far

Newton is a proven hard runner and McGrew is a good change of pace back. The article is dead on...

I especially like the part where they state he will approach 1000 yards if he maintains his 5.3 ypc and gets between 150-200 carries. Great analysis. Math is awesome!

CFetters_Nacho_Lover

AtomicDawg said:

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

Canadawg said:

None a yall know which RB is going to be good. All flashes so far

Newton is a proven hard runner and McGrew is a good change of pace back. The article is dead on...

I especially like the part where they state he will approach 1000 yards if he maintains his 5.3 ypc and gets between 150-200 carries. Great analysis. Math is awesome!

Advanced analytics

PostGameOrangeSlices

AtomicDawg said:

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

Canadawg said:

None a yall know which RB is going to be good. All flashes so far

Newton is a proven hard runner and McGrew is a good change of pace back. The article is dead on...

I especially like the part where they state he will approach 1000 yards if he maintains his 5.3 ypc and gets between 150-200 carries. Great analysis. Math is awesome!

But still

RaceBannon

CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

AtomicDawg said:

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

Canadawg said:

None a yall know which RB is going to be good. All flashes so far

Newton is a proven hard runner and McGrew is a good change of pace back. The article is dead on...

I especially like the part where they state he will approach 1000 yards if he maintains his 5.3 ypc and gets between 150-200 carries. Great analysis. Math is awesome!

Advanced analytics

@HeretoBeatmyChest

AEB

No chance Fig gets anywhere close to 1000 yards. Suffering from a standard case of Doogism