Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Bountygate Update
Comments
-
What part of HE RAISED IT WITH HIM IMMEDIATELY AFTER TAKING OFFICE was too difficult for you?hardhat said: -
What part of this do you not understand. Also, why are you yelling?HHusky said:
What part of HE RAISED IT WITH HIM IMMEDIATELY AFTER TAKING OFFICE was too difficult for you?hardhat said:
The credibility of last summer’s bombshell report alleging the Russian government was paying bounties to Taliban fighters to kill U.S. troops in Afghanistan took another hit this week when a senior Biden administration official told reporters they only have “low-to-moderate confidence” in the intelligence behind the story.
The intelligence was based on notoriously unreliable “detainee reporting,” the official said on the call, meaning that it came from militants looking to get out of jail.
This was months after Biden allegedly brought it up to Putin on a phone call based on your news from ariana grande. -
None of which explains why you asked your ill-informed question. (And the bounty story has never "fallen apart", nor was it based solely upon detainee interviews.)hardhat said:
What part of this do you not understand. Also, why are you yelling?HHusky said:
What part of HE RAISED IT WITH HIM IMMEDIATELY AFTER TAKING OFFICE was too difficult for you?hardhat said:
The credibility of last summer’s bombshell report alleging the Russian government was paying bounties to Taliban fighters to kill U.S. troops in Afghanistan took another hit this week when a senior Biden administration official told reporters they only have “low-to-moderate confidence” in the intelligence behind the story.
The intelligence was based on notoriously unreliable “detainee reporting,” the official said on the call, meaning that it came from militants looking to get out of jail.
This was months after Biden allegedly brought it up to Putin on a phone call based on your news from ariana grande. -
zealots gonna zealotHHusky said:
None of which explains why you asked your ill-informed question. (And the bounty story has never "fallen apart", nor was it based solely upon detainee interviews.)hardhat said:
What part of this do you not understand. Also, why are you yelling?HHusky said:
What part of HE RAISED IT WITH HIM IMMEDIATELY AFTER TAKING OFFICE was too difficult for you?hardhat said:
The credibility of last summer’s bombshell report alleging the Russian government was paying bounties to Taliban fighters to kill U.S. troops in Afghanistan took another hit this week when a senior Biden administration official told reporters they only have “low-to-moderate confidence” in the intelligence behind the story.
The intelligence was based on notoriously unreliable “detainee reporting,” the official said on the call, meaning that it came from militants looking to get out of jail.
This was months after Biden allegedly brought it up to Putin on a phone call based on your news from ariana grande. -
awesomehardhat said:
zealots gonna zealotHHusky said:
None of which explains why you asked your ill-informed question. (And the bounty story has never "fallen apart", nor was it based solely upon detainee interviews.)hardhat said:
What part of this do you not understand. Also, why are you yelling?HHusky said:
What part of HE RAISED IT WITH HIM IMMEDIATELY AFTER TAKING OFFICE was too difficult for you?hardhat said:
The credibility of last summer’s bombshell report alleging the Russian government was paying bounties to Taliban fighters to kill U.S. troops in Afghanistan took another hit this week when a senior Biden administration official told reporters they only have “low-to-moderate confidence” in the intelligence behind the story.
The intelligence was based on notoriously unreliable “detainee reporting,” the official said on the call, meaning that it came from militants looking to get out of jail.
This was months after Biden allegedly brought it up to Putin on a phone call based on your news from ariana grande. -
What's more awesome is that if true, then Biden could have asked why he and his buddy barry allowed these to happen under their watch. As if it just only started happening under Trump. Sure.HHusky said:
awesomehardhat said:
zealots gonna zealotHHusky said:
None of which explains why you asked your ill-informed question. (And the bounty story has never "fallen apart", nor was it based solely upon detainee interviews.)hardhat said:
What part of this do you not understand. Also, why are you yelling?HHusky said:
What part of HE RAISED IT WITH HIM IMMEDIATELY AFTER TAKING OFFICE was too difficult for you?hardhat said:
The credibility of last summer’s bombshell report alleging the Russian government was paying bounties to Taliban fighters to kill U.S. troops in Afghanistan took another hit this week when a senior Biden administration official told reporters they only have “low-to-moderate confidence” in the intelligence behind the story.
The intelligence was based on notoriously unreliable “detainee reporting,” the official said on the call, meaning that it came from militants looking to get out of jail.
This was months after Biden allegedly brought it up to Putin on a phone call based on your news from ariana grande. -
Nobody blamed Daddy for anything but being a pussy about confronting his boss.hardhat said:
What's more awesome is that if true, then Biden could have asked why he and his buddy barry allowed these to happen under their watch. As if it just only started happening under Trump. Sure.HHusky said:
awesomehardhat said:
zealots gonna zealotHHusky said:
None of which explains why you asked your ill-informed question. (And the bounty story has never "fallen apart", nor was it based solely upon detainee interviews.)hardhat said:
What part of this do you not understand. Also, why are you yelling?HHusky said:
What part of HE RAISED IT WITH HIM IMMEDIATELY AFTER TAKING OFFICE was too difficult for you?hardhat said:
The credibility of last summer’s bombshell report alleging the Russian government was paying bounties to Taliban fighters to kill U.S. troops in Afghanistan took another hit this week when a senior Biden administration official told reporters they only have “low-to-moderate confidence” in the intelligence behind the story.
The intelligence was based on notoriously unreliable “detainee reporting,” the official said on the call, meaning that it came from militants looking to get out of jail.
This was months after Biden allegedly brought it up to Putin on a phone call based on your news from ariana grande. -
So he "raised" it with him. Big deal. Did do anything about it? Why didn't he "raise" it with again when he was speaking face to face with him? It was such a BIG fucking deal to you, why did you let yourself be bought off with a simple phone call where he "raised" that issue and then did nothing about it?HHusky said:
What part of HE RAISED IT WITH HIM IMMEDIATELY AFTER TAKING OFFICE was too difficult for you?hardhat said: -
I'm well aware of your obsession with Trump and anything that he allegedly did. As a disaffected liberal, that kind of obsession is what red-pilled me over the last 4 years. Why would someone believe that bullshit just because they think it 'owns Trump'? If anything, the bounties would have gone back years and would indicate that Obama and Biden were culpable for not doing anything about it. And that our intelligence services are idiots. I can assure you there are smart, decent people that work in that capacity that love America no matter who is president. No matter how much people hate Trump, this is just stupid.HHusky said:
Nobody blamed Daddy for anything but being a pussy about confronting his boss.hardhat said:
What's more awesome is that if true, then Biden could have asked why he and his buddy barry allowed these to happen under their watch. As if it just only started happening under Trump. Sure.HHusky said:
awesomehardhat said:
zealots gonna zealotHHusky said:
None of which explains why you asked your ill-informed question. (And the bounty story has never "fallen apart", nor was it based solely upon detainee interviews.)hardhat said:
What part of this do you not understand. Also, why are you yelling?HHusky said:
What part of HE RAISED IT WITH HIM IMMEDIATELY AFTER TAKING OFFICE was too difficult for you?hardhat said:
The credibility of last summer’s bombshell report alleging the Russian government was paying bounties to Taliban fighters to kill U.S. troops in Afghanistan took another hit this week when a senior Biden administration official told reporters they only have “low-to-moderate confidence” in the intelligence behind the story.
The intelligence was based on notoriously unreliable “detainee reporting,” the official said on the call, meaning that it came from militants looking to get out of jail.
This was months after Biden allegedly brought it up to Putin on a phone call based on your news from ariana grande.
