Lake Mead drops to record low levels

Fire_Marshall_Bill

I need an OBK conspiracy theory to explain what's really going on...

https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/arizona-environment/2021/06/10/lake-mead-declines-new-low-colorado-river-crisis-deepens-arizona-drought/7621138002/?cid=facebook_azcentral&fbclid=IwAR2Wgtac1Ucd8rz8Ft9d1dzp_D9SiZyygVmY1ejGbe1c6lpOWlk3UmHDlhE

doogie

Pro tip: helluva deal on boats @TheMarina but be warned, can be expensive to move @Logistics

Bendintheriver

I think CA, AZ, OR and NV should empty more dams to save the silver bait fish or whatever the environmental cause they use to fuck up water retention.

For anyone interested, this article is short and to the point. Environmental whacko's fucked the people of CA.

https://www.city-journal.org/html/scorching-california-13704.html

The Scorching of California
How Green extremists made a bad drought worse

For 50 years, the state transferred surface water from northern California to the Central Valley through the California State Water Project and the federal Central Valley Project. Given these vast and ambitious initiatives, Californians didn’t worry much about the occasional one- or two-year drought or the steady growth in population. The postwar, can-do mentality resulted in a brilliantly engineered water system, far ahead of its time, that brought canal water daily from the 30 percent of the state where rain and snow were plentiful—mostly north of Sacramento as well as from the Sierra Nevada Mountains—to the lower, western, and warmer 70 percent of the state, where people preferred to work, farm, and live.

Everyone seemed to benefit. Floods in northern California became a thing of the past. The more than 40 major mountain reservoirs generated clean hydroelectric power. New lakes offered recreation for millions living in a once-arid state. Gravity-fed snowmelt was channeled into irrigation canals, opening millions of new acres to farming and ending reliance on pumping the aquifer. To most Californians, the irrigated, fertile Central Valley seemed a natural occurrence, not an environmental anomaly made possible only through the foresight of a now-forgotten generation of engineers and hydrologists.

Just as California’s freeways were designed to grow to meet increased traffic, the state’s vast water projects were engineered to expand with the population. Many assumed that the state would finish planned additions to the California State Water Project and its ancillaries. But in the 1960s and early 1970s, no one anticipated that the then-nascent environmental movement would one day go to court to stop most new dam construction, including the 14,000-acre Sites Reservoir on the Sacramento River near Maxwell; the Los Banos Grandes facility, along a section of the California Aqueduct in Merced County; and the Temperance Flat Reservoir, above Millerton Lake north of Fresno. Had the gigantic Klamath River diversion project not likewise been canceled in the 1970s, the resulting Aw Paw reservoir would have been the state’s largest man-made reservoir. At two-thirds the size of Lake Mead, it might have stored 15 million acre-feet of water, enough to supply San Francisco for 30 years. California’s water-storage capacity would be nearly double what it is today had these plans come to fruition. It was just as difficult to imagine that environmentalists would try to divert contracted irrigation and municipal water from already-established reservoirs. Yet they did just that, and subsequently moved to freeze California’s water-storage resources at 1970s capacities.

EsophagealFeces

Fucking morons

RoadDawg55

It’s not global warming, it’s climate change. I’m kidding. Just being clear so certain tuggers don’t get triggered.

MikeDamone

Bendintheriver said:

I think CA, AZ, OR and NV should empty more dams to save the silver bait fish or whatever the environmental cause they use to fuck up water retention.

For anyone interested, this article is short and to the point. Environmental whacko's fucked the people of CA.

https://www.city-journal.org/html/scorching-california-13704.html

The Scorching of California
How Green extremists made a bad drought worse

For 50 years, the state transferred surface water from northern California to the Central Valley through the California State Water Project and the federal Central Valley Project. Given these vast and ambitious initiatives, Californians didn’t worry much about the occasional one- or two-year drought or the steady growth in population. The postwar, can-do mentality resulted in a brilliantly engineered water system, far ahead of its time, that brought canal water daily from the 30 percent of the state where rain and snow were plentiful—mostly north of Sacramento as well as from the Sierra Nevada Mountains—to the lower, western, and warmer 70 percent of the state, where people preferred to work, farm, and live.

Everyone seemed to benefit. Floods in northern California became a thing of the past. The more than 40 major mountain reservoirs generated clean hydroelectric power. New lakes offered recreation for millions living in a once-arid state. Gravity-fed snowmelt was channeled into irrigation canals, opening millions of new acres to farming and ending reliance on pumping the aquifer. To most Californians, the irrigated, fertile Central Valley seemed a natural occurrence, not an environmental anomaly made possible only through the foresight of a now-forgotten generation of engineers and hydrologists.

Just as California’s freeways were designed to grow to meet increased traffic, the state’s vast water projects were engineered to expand with the population. Many assumed that the state would finish planned additions to the California State Water Project and its ancillaries. But in the 1960s and early 1970s, no one anticipated that the then-nascent environmental movement would one day go to court to stop most new dam construction, including the 14,000-acre Sites Reservoir on the Sacramento River near Maxwell; the Los Banos Grandes facility, along a section of the California Aqueduct in Merced County; and the Temperance Flat Reservoir, above Millerton Lake north of Fresno. Had the gigantic Klamath River diversion project not likewise been canceled in the 1970s, the resulting Aw Paw reservoir would have been the state’s largest man-made reservoir. At two-thirds the size of Lake Mead, it might have stored 15 million acre-feet of water, enough to supply San Francisco for 30 years. California’s water-storage capacity would be nearly double what it is today had these plans come to fruition. It was just as difficult to imagine that environmentalists would try to divert contracted irrigation and municipal water from already-established reservoirs. Yet they did just that, and subsequently moved to freeze California’s water-storage resources at 1970s capacities.

California can do what it wants.

Kaepsknee

Winter is coming for California.

PurpleThrobber

Kaepsknee said:

Winter is coming for California.

Beers and sunshine in Greater Idaho.

Bendintheriver

MikeDamone said:

Bendintheriver said:

I think CA, AZ, OR and NV should empty more dams to save the silver bait fish or whatever the environmental cause they use to fuck up water retention.

For anyone interested, this article is short and to the point. Environmental whacko's fucked the people of CA.

https://www.city-journal.org/html/scorching-california-13704.html

The Scorching of California
How Green extremists made a bad drought worse

For 50 years, the state transferred surface water from northern California to the Central Valley through the California State Water Project and the federal Central Valley Project. Given these vast and ambitious initiatives, Californians didn’t worry much about the occasional one- or two-year drought or the steady growth in population. The postwar, can-do mentality resulted in a brilliantly engineered water system, far ahead of its time, that brought canal water daily from the 30 percent of the state where rain and snow were plentiful—mostly north of Sacramento as well as from the Sierra Nevada Mountains—to the lower, western, and warmer 70 percent of the state, where people preferred to work, farm, and live.

Everyone seemed to benefit. Floods in northern California became a thing of the past. The more than 40 major mountain reservoirs generated clean hydroelectric power. New lakes offered recreation for millions living in a once-arid state. Gravity-fed snowmelt was channeled into irrigation canals, opening millions of new acres to farming and ending reliance on pumping the aquifer. To most Californians, the irrigated, fertile Central Valley seemed a natural occurrence, not an environmental anomaly made possible only through the foresight of a now-forgotten generation of engineers and hydrologists.

Just as California’s freeways were designed to grow to meet increased traffic, the state’s vast water projects were engineered to expand with the population. Many assumed that the state would finish planned additions to the California State Water Project and its ancillaries. But in the 1960s and early 1970s, no one anticipated that the then-nascent environmental movement would one day go to court to stop most new dam construction, including the 14,000-acre Sites Reservoir on the Sacramento River near Maxwell; the Los Banos Grandes facility, along a section of the California Aqueduct in Merced County; and the Temperance Flat Reservoir, above Millerton Lake north of Fresno. Had the gigantic Klamath River diversion project not likewise been canceled in the 1970s, the resulting Aw Paw reservoir would have been the state’s largest man-made reservoir. At two-thirds the size of Lake Mead, it might have stored 15 million acre-feet of water, enough to supply San Francisco for 30 years. California’s water-storage capacity would be nearly double what it is today had these plans come to fruition. It was just as difficult to imagine that environmentalists would try to divert contracted irrigation and municipal water from already-established reservoirs. Yet they did just that, and subsequently moved to freeze California’s water-storage resources at 1970s capacities.

California can do what it wants.

Yep. The problem is (as you know) once they fuck things up, they move. Then they fuck things up in their new place. Rats never learn.

oregonblitzkrieg

The persistent droughts in the Western United States are not caused by Vladimir Putin or
Xi Jinping. They are caused by the Weather Warfare Program of the Evil City State of
Washington DC.



Low frequency wave transmitters are used to alter the jet streams, and because the World is
interconnected and operated by a Cabal of Satanists, sometimes various nations run
operations jointly to conduct weather warfare attacks on particular locations. If you don't
believe in Weather Warfare, look up "Operation Popeye" where the US flooded supply routes
in Vietnam. 33rd Degree Freemason Eisenhower operated a Weather Warfare Program and it
continues to this day. It's been a reality for about a century now.



The US government heats the ionosphere from Alaska using HAARP, and conducts massive
spraying operations in the Eastern Pacific to create high pressure ridges on West Coast of
the US to block precipitation. Corporations from the NWO Military Industrial Complex,
Raytheon and Lockheed Martin, provide the weather modelling maps for NOAA and FAA,
and they are actively involved in weather manipulation. They can predict when and where
a flood will hit, because they cause the flooding.



The picture would not be complete without an appearance from our good friend "Bill Gates,"
who is dimming the Sun. Solar Radiation Management programs reduce evaporation of the
Oceans, decreasing precipitation.



The scenario thus created is a dry, baked landscape vulnerable to the fire attacks that they
conduct during the Spring and Summer months using directed energy weapons, like the
one that burned Paradise CA, and slow burning fires in underground tunnel systems.



They profit from these attacks in various ways - by buying and selling weather derivates
on the Stock Exchanges. Water is now tradeable commodity. Short the water market,
then dry up the water supply. They can make money through insurance schemes, because
they know when and where the weather attacks will hit. It's not just about money though,
it's about a system of total slavery and control - Agenda 21. They want you OUT of the
Western US. They want you in the large cities, vaxxed and in close proximity to the
5g Control Grid.



The News is fake, the movies are real. Start watching more films. They use Hollywood to
tell what they've been up to and what they're planning to do. It's part of their secret code -
it's a requirement of theirs, to foretell their plans ahead of time, they believe that by doing
so, they absolve themselves of karmic responsibility for the crimes they intend to commit.
As for Agenda 21 -

https://youtu.be/5TRso_3x5zc

They want the American West restricted and populated by large carnivores. What they
mean by large carnivores is not lions, tigers and bears.



Think more along the lines of Jurassic Park. They have growing chimeras in underground
labs for a long time. Do you believe they haven't been experimenting with reviving the
dinosaurs? They will never tell you about the technology they possess in secret until they
have moved beyond the point where it can be stopped.