Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

The new Doog

doogsinparadisedoogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
in Hardcore Husky Board
Swallowing everything that Peterman will do before he actually does it. He'll make a few mistakes just like any coach, don't be a sloppy dicklicker. High standards please.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,844


    I agree that you don't know what you really have in CP. And those that are cocksure that He's the savior are true Doogs.

    But if ur gonna hate on swallowing.....

    I'm out.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,506 Swaye's Wigwam
    Most people here aren't gonna cut him any slack in his first year in the Pac, with a lack of experience at some positions (and justifiably so). One of the things that I at least am swallowing is his competence in putting a team together. We've gone over what he's done in the last couple months so I won't rehash it. Hell, when is the last time we've won some key recruiting battles over OSU and Oregon in the same fucking year? I think this coach deserves the benefit of the doubt for now. My senior year at UW was Sark's first, and the whole situation just reeked of over-hyped California bullshit that the doogpounders like to call "giving hope back to the program." Petersen has been all-business since he's arrived.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffleCuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,493
    Pressing
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 104,474 Founders Club
    Every thread
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    doogsinparadise said:

    Swallowing everything that Peterman will do before he actually does it. He'll make a few mistakes just like any coach, don't be a sloppy dicklicker. High standards please.

    LEAVE!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffleCuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,493
    salemcoog said:



    I agree that you don't know what you really have in CP. And those that are cocksure that He's the savior are true Doogs.

    But if ur gonna hate on swallowing.....

    I'm out.

    Well he certainly is no Leach that is for sure but he is a lot better than Sark.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • topdawgnctopdawgnc Member Posts: 7,838
    92-12
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    "Hell, when is the last time we've won some key recruiting battles over OSU and Oregon in the same fucking year? "

    Uh, when you were in like middle school we beat there ass like every year. We still kick OSU's ass in recruiting for the most part. .

    " this coach deserves the benefit of the doubt for now. My senior year at UW was Sark's first..."

    No shit?



    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • chuckchuck Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,925 Swaye's Wigwam
    Sarkingham said:

    The new doogs are the people that blindly supported every single thing that Dude Brah did but are now questioning whether or not Petermen can get it done in the Pac12.

    In other words, the new doogs are the same as the old doogs.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HeretoBeatmyChestHeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    salemcoog said:



    I agree that you don't know what you really have in CP. And those that are cocksure that He's the savior are true Doogs.

    But if ur gonna hate on swallowing.....

    I'm out.

    Swing and a miss.

    We know what we have. But its fine for you to think otherwise if you want.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 22,947
    dnc said:

    Sarkingham said:

    The new doogs are the people that blindly supported every single thing that Dude Brah did but are now questioning whether or not Petermen can get it done in the Pac12.

    In other words, the new doogs are the same as the old doogs.

    HRYK

    These are the people who:
    - Loved Lambo (#HiPLSS!)
    - Hated Rick With The Rose Bowl.
    - Loved Gilby and his TUFF questions.
    - Loved Ty for cleaning up the program.
    - Loved Rick Without the Rose Bowel.
    = Aren't sure about Petersen.

    Given their track record, I'd guess they're the ones who would have fired Don James after year 3/1988/abundance
    agree with that and agree w/ Race. Peterman has enough of a track record that he gets the benefit of the doubt. no doubt. and it's clear we have a grown up running things now. it was just as clear from the get-go that we didn't before.

    one tiny little bit of doubt that lingers for me is this: he did what he did in totally different conference context than the Pac 12, and I thought Hawkins was a great coach too. not being negative, just observing the obvious there.

    that said, yeah, there's reason to assume better things are on the way.

    a doog is a doog is a doog. doesn't matter what era it is. there were Willingham doogs, if you can actually take yourself back far enough in time.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    creepycoug said:

    dnc said:

    Sarkingham said:

    The new doogs are the people that blindly supported every single thing that Dude Brah did but are now questioning whether or not Petermen can get it done in the Pac12.

    In other words, the new doogs are the same as the old doogs.

    HRYK

    These are the people who:
    - Loved Lambo (#HiPLSS!)
    - Hated Rick With The Rose Bowl.
    - Loved Gilby and his TUFF questions.
    - Loved Ty for cleaning up the program.
    - Loved Rick Without the Rose Bowel.
    = Aren't sure about Petersen.

    Given their track record, I'd guess they're the ones who would have fired Don James after year 3/1988/abundance
    agree with that and agree w/ Race. Peterman has enough of a track record that he gets the benefit of the doubt. no doubt. and it's clear we have a grown up running things now. it was just as clear from the get-go that we didn't before.

    one tiny little bit of doubt that lingers for me is this: he did what he did in totally different conference context than the Pac 12, and I thought Hawkins was a great coach too. not being negative, just observing the obvious there.

    that said, yeah, there's reason to assume better things are on the way.

    a doog is a doog is a doog. doesn't matter what era it is. there were Lambright doogs, if you can actually take yourself back far enough in time.
    Obvious correction.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,519 Founders Club
    We know Peterman will do just as well as SWS, and there's a 95% chance he will do better, incl. some ten win seasons, and probably a RB and top ten season every 3-5 years if not more frequently. Of course there's a chance of failure, but it seems very unlikely.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TailgaterTailgater Member Posts: 1,389
    I suppose it must be my upbringing which has taken longer than probably anybody else around here, but give me Bronco breath any day over scumbag. It's not the tradition of Trojan athletics coming to foul our turf by the lake that was so disgusting, but that a succession of UW presidents forced us for two decades to swallow USC's.... stain.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.