Elon is almost as smart as creepycoug, which is sad really given my alma mater and all that.
Viability is a tempting line to draw for the interested, but unsophisticated.
Viability changes with technology. Does anyone mean to suggest that we invent some whoozeywhatsit that will push the viability line back a month that it is on that basis that we draw the ever important line of personhood moral significance? I mean, we have to draw rando lines for all kinds of things, like drinking age, knowing full well it's just a spot we picked because we have to pick one.
But here, you're talking about whether something (err, someone) possesses the same moral properties (and related rights) that you and I have. That's a big line brother. We're going to leave it up to the Tech bros?
I don't fucking think so. I know a much better line: at conception. Once that happens, all bets are off and we are dealing with a person, whether that's today, 100 years from now and 100 years ago.
Don't like it? Keep it in your pants, and keep your legs crossed. Or use contraception. Either way,
No that's definitely part of it. But I'm indirectly quoting Dino Rossi.
From This:
Then this:
To this in 4 years:
200,000 more votes in just four years. Hmm. After Rob McKenna I'll agree with you. Reichert is the better candidate and person (the only Blanchet grad I trust is Joe Steele) but his chances are slim.
Mike McSchwin and Kshama Sherwama have both utilized the print ballot option openly and in public. Pedo enable Mike even admitted in tweets years ago, now marked private.
Comments
Probably CGI
Curious as to what the letter said
I could probably go back, download it, and increase it to 250% but I'm not going to
Elon sent @creepycoug a PM
.
Elon is almost as smart as creepycoug, which is sad really given my alma mater and all that.
Viability is a tempting line to draw for the interested, but unsophisticated.
Viability changes with technology. Does anyone mean to suggest that we invent some whoozeywhatsit that will push the viability line back a month that it is on that basis that we draw the ever important line of personhood moral significance? I mean, we have to draw rando lines for all kinds of things, like drinking age, knowing full well it's just a spot we picked because we have to pick one.
But here, you're talking about whether something (err, someone) possesses the same moral properties (and related rights) that you and I have. That's a big line brother. We're going to leave it up to the Tech bros?
I don't fucking think so. I know a much better line: at conception. Once that happens, all bets are off and we are dealing with a person, whether that's today, 100 years from now and 100 years ago.
Don't like it? Keep it in your pants, and keep your legs crossed. Or use contraception. Either way,
Archie was hilarious. Carroll O'Connor wasn't very conservative.
You lefty city folk really need these in your front yard.
We agree completely. Way too much has been abdicated to TechBro.
.
Kind of makes one wonder how WA went from very competitive to landslide victories?
Couldn’t be because of bad GOP policy, horrible candidates or any of that stuff.
Look who hasn’t walked anywhere downtown Seattle the last decade.
.
No that's definitely part of it. But I'm indirectly quoting Dino Rossi.
From This:
Then this:
To this in 4 years:
200,000 more votes in just four years. Hmm. After Rob McKenna I'll agree with you. Reichert is the better candidate and person (the only Blanchet grad I trust is Joe Steele) but his chances are slim.
Mike McSchwin and Kshama Sherwama have both utilized the print ballot option openly and in public. Pedo enable Mike even admitted in tweets years ago, now marked private.
YBE
.