Kamala "Heels-Up" Harris Suggests That Ukraine Is Part of NATO —Ace Someone Failed to Position Her For Success Again.
Before getting to that, I have to direct your attention to an even more egregious video of Kamala's stunning unpreparedness.
I missed this clip of her babbling in a bilateral press conference with the President of Romania. Here, she is asked -- addressed as "Mrs. Vice President" -- about US gas prices and what the Biden Administration would say to Americans about it. And this question is posed in English.
Kamala Harris turns to the president of Romania and bizarrely pleads with him to answer the question.
Then, when he declines to answer about US gas prices or what the Biden Administration would tell Americans about them -- because he's the president of Romania -- she begins reading off her notes about... what she talked with the president of Romania about.
This is what she said instead of answering the question:
Harris immediately looked to Iohannis to which he pointed back at her to take the question. She paused for a moment and responded, "In terms of the discussions that the president Iohannis and I had, they ranged in subject including the issue of the Black Sea and I'll let him explain in more detail as he would like." Again at the end she directs the question to President Iohannis! Again she says, "Ask the more capable man for the details of the homework assignment I didn't do."
This really is inexcusable. She is everything the press said that Dan Quayle was, and worse.
Below, Harris suggests that Ukraine is part of NATO.
Atlanta was not moral enough to hold the All Star game, but Russia and the Chicoms can hold the Olympics (Russia is more a corrupt fascist state versus China's pretend commie theftocracy). The toss in Qatar, noted lover of the gays, is hosting the World Cup. You can't spell leftard without "hypocrisy".
Apparently shooting a white girl trying to stab to death a black girl would have been a good shooting. However, a white cop shooting a black girl who was trying to stab to death another black girl was just a cop looking to fill his hunting tag for black women.
A jury refused to indict the officer who shot the black girl who was in the process of stabbing another black girl. Jonathan Turley notes the leftwing media once again sprang into action to defame this man.
I wrote earlier that I believed that the shooting was justified under departmental rules and legal precedent. Nevertheless, the shooting of the teenager was decried as murder in the media. "The View" co-host Joy Behar insisted that, when the officer saw Bryant moving to stab another girl, he should have shot in the air. The grand jury clearly disagreed and refused to indict Officer Nicholas Reardon. At the time of the shooting, various media outlets like NPR posted misleading accounts of the shooting, which fueled anger in the city. (NPR later corrected its original account):
The Daily Beast also ran misleading coverage, including a quote from "local Columbus activist K.C. Taynor of Exodus Nation" that "the latest police killing made it impossible to celebrate the Chauvin verdict. It's another murder. They're animals. They treat us like animals."
Such hair-triggered coverage has become the norm where public anger is fueled by false accounts or claims by media, including the Rittenhouse case and Sandmann controversy where the subjects later sued the media.
As we previously discussed, politicians and commentators often have a distorted view of the standard and realities in these cases. President Biden has long maintained that police officers should shoot armed suspects in the leg. However, there is a reason why police manuals do not say "aim for the leg" or "try to shoot the weapon out of the suspect's hand." It is called "imminent harm," the standard governing all police shootings. The fact that many of us describe such shootings as "justified" is not to belittle these tragedies but to recognize the underlying exigencies that control the use of lethal force.
Apparently shooting a white girl trying to stab to death a black girl would have been a good shooting. However, a white cop shooting a black girl who was trying to stab to death another black girl was just a cop looking to fill his hunting tag for black women.
A jury refused to indict the officer who shot the black girl who was in the process of stabbing another black girl. Jonathan Turley notes the leftwing media once again sprang into action to defame this man.
I wrote earlier that I believed that the shooting was justified under departmental rules and legal precedent. Nevertheless, the shooting of the teenager was decried as murder in the media. "The View" co-host Joy Behar insisted that, when the officer saw Bryant moving to stab another girl, he should have shot in the air. The grand jury clearly disagreed and refused to indict Officer Nicholas Reardon. At the time of the shooting, various media outlets like NPR posted misleading accounts of the shooting, which fueled anger in the city. (NPR later corrected its original account):
The Daily Beast also ran misleading coverage, including a quote from "local Columbus activist K.C. Taynor of Exodus Nation" that "the latest police killing made it impossible to celebrate the Chauvin verdict. It's another murder. They're animals. They treat us like animals."
Such hair-triggered coverage has become the norm where public anger is fueled by false accounts or claims by media, including the Rittenhouse case and Sandmann controversy where the subjects later sued the media.
As we previously discussed, politicians and commentators often have a distorted view of the standard and realities in these cases. President Biden has long maintained that police officers should shoot armed suspects in the leg. However, there is a reason why police manuals do not say "aim for the leg" or "try to shoot the weapon out of the suspect's hand." It is called "imminent harm," the standard governing all police shootings. The fact that many of us describe such shootings as "justified" is not to belittle these tragedies but to recognize the underlying exigencies that control the use of lethal force.
Apparently shooting a white girl trying to stab to death a black girl would have been a good shooting. However, a white cop shooting a black girl who was trying to stab to death another black girl was just a cop looking to fill his hunting tag for black women.
A jury refused to indict the officer who shot the black girl who was in the process of stabbing another black girl. Jonathan Turley notes the leftwing media once again sprang into action to defame this man.
I wrote earlier that I believed that the shooting was justified under departmental rules and legal precedent. Nevertheless, the shooting of the teenager was decried as murder in the media. "The View" co-host Joy Behar insisted that, when the officer saw Bryant moving to stab another girl, he should have shot in the air. The grand jury clearly disagreed and refused to indict Officer Nicholas Reardon. At the time of the shooting, various media outlets like NPR posted misleading accounts of the shooting, which fueled anger in the city. (NPR later corrected its original account):
The Daily Beast also ran misleading coverage, including a quote from "local Columbus activist K.C. Taynor of Exodus Nation" that "the latest police killing made it impossible to celebrate the Chauvin verdict. It's another murder. They're animals. They treat us like animals."
Such hair-triggered coverage has become the norm where public anger is fueled by false accounts or claims by media, including the Rittenhouse case and Sandmann controversy where the subjects later sued the media.
As we previously discussed, politicians and commentators often have a distorted view of the standard and realities in these cases. President Biden has long maintained that police officers should shoot armed suspects in the leg. However, there is a reason why police manuals do not say "aim for the leg" or "try to shoot the weapon out of the suspect's hand." It is called "imminent harm," the standard governing all police shootings. The fact that many of us describe such shootings as "justified" is not to belittle these tragedies but to recognize the underlying exigencies that control the use of lethal force.
Behar is a dumb cunt. Do people listen to her?
Yes, the stupid White suburban Karen's that gave us Joey. They think she tells the truth. Along with the rest of the cows on that shitshow.
It's amazing how much love the chicoms get from the American left and how much they hate Trump. So, Trump is the authoritarian (no evidence) and colluded with the Russians (no evidence, and evidence ignored that it was the PIPS' campaign that colluded) is to blame for some thug assaulting someone who had nothing to do with the chicom crud. Sure.
Comments
https://ace.mu.nu/
Kamala "Heels-Up" Harris Suggests That Ukraine Is Part of NATO
—Ace
Someone Failed to Position Her For Success Again.
Before getting to that, I have to direct your attention to an even more egregious video of Kamala's stunning unpreparedness.
I missed this clip of her babbling in a bilateral press conference with the President of Romania. Here, she is asked -- addressed as "Mrs. Vice President" -- about US gas prices and what the Biden Administration would say to Americans about it. And this question is posed in English.
Kamala Harris turns to the president of Romania and bizarrely pleads with him to answer the question.
Then, when he declines to answer about US gas prices or what the Biden Administration would tell Americans about them -- because he's the president of Romania -- she begins reading off her notes about... what she talked with the president of Romania about.
This is what she said instead of answering the question:
Harris immediately looked to Iohannis to which he pointed back at her to take the question. She paused for a moment and responded, "In terms of the discussions that the president Iohannis and I had, they ranged in subject including the issue of the Black Sea and I'll let him explain in more detail as he would like."
Again at the end she directs the question to President Iohannis! Again she says, "Ask the more capable man for the details of the homework assignment I didn't do."
This really is inexcusable. She is everything the press said that Dan Quayle was, and worse.
Below, Harris suggests that Ukraine is part of NATO.
https://ace.mu.nu/
A jury refused to indict the officer who shot the black girl who was in the process of stabbing another black girl. Jonathan Turley notes the leftwing media once again sprang into action to defame this man.
I wrote earlier that I believed that the shooting was justified under departmental rules and legal precedent. Nevertheless, the shooting of the teenager was decried as murder in the media. "The View" co-host Joy Behar insisted that, when the officer saw Bryant moving to stab another girl, he should have shot in the air. The grand jury clearly disagreed and refused to indict Officer Nicholas Reardon.
At the time of the shooting, various media outlets like NPR posted misleading accounts of the shooting, which fueled anger in the city. (NPR later corrected its original account):
The Daily Beast also ran misleading coverage, including a quote from "local Columbus activist K.C. Taynor of Exodus Nation" that "the latest police killing made it impossible to celebrate the Chauvin verdict. It's another murder. They're animals. They treat us like animals."
Such hair-triggered coverage has become the norm where public anger is fueled by false accounts or claims by media, including the Rittenhouse case and Sandmann controversy where the subjects later sued the media.
As we previously discussed, politicians and commentators often have a distorted view of the standard and realities in these cases. President Biden has long maintained that police officers should shoot armed suspects in the leg. However, there is a reason why police manuals do not say "aim for the leg" or "try to shoot the weapon out of the suspect's hand." It is called "imminent harm," the standard governing all police shootings. The fact that many of us describe such shootings as "justified" is not to belittle these tragedies but to recognize the underlying exigencies that control the use of lethal force.
Guy is a Trump voter