Got to love the liberals who just say that if we give people housing we'd no longer have a homeless problem. How big a fucking fool do you need to be in order think that people are homeless because they don't have a place to live? People are homeless on account of their behavior. Giving them a house doesn't change their behavior and without the change in behavior they would destroy and make unlivable any house you gave them and turn whatever neighborhood that house was in, into a shit-hole.
Rent in SF = $$$
Drug Habit in SF = $$$$$
It's a drug problem, not a housing problem.
Of course it's a drug problem. If I can't afford the rent somewhere I'm living I move. I don't become a meth-head. They're homeless because they are drug addicts. They're not drug addicts because the rent to too damn high.
You can see it here on the Pump. Not one leftard is currently interested in a fair and auditable election by citizens of the US and an actual resident of the state they vote in. No ID, unclean voter rolls (non-citizens, dead voters and multiple state registrations) are of no concern to the dazzler. Then toss in election officials running copied ballots through the machine, again with no oversight and still no problem.
You can see it here on the Pump. Not one leftard is currently interested in a fair and auditable election by citizens of the US and an actual resident of the state they vote in. No ID, unclean voter rolls (non-citizens, dead voters and multiple state registrations) are of no concern to the dazzler. Then toss in election officials running copied ballots through the machine, again with no oversight and still no problem.
Comments
Chinvitation, Stat!