She was remarkably calm when her man just got shot right in front of her.
I get the impression that he was a just younger guy that came by to get some tail from time to time. The woman appears to be quite a few years older than the perp. She's also a real peach. "Get this bitch out of my house." Your tax dollars at work. Appears to also be a new public housing unit.
This is the building. I'm not surprised you assumed it was public housing.
Office of Tax and Revenue Customer Service Center Suite W270 1101 4th Street, SW Washington, DC 20024
And that building also includes DC city government offices, making the likelihood that many if not all of the residential units in that building are subsidized housing. Do you have a point? What makes you think there aren't subsidized housing units in that complex? It's mixed used building containing City of DC government offices.
Lol. The address of the apartment building is 1150 4th St SW. You're even squirellier than usual trying to backtrack on this one.
Okay, now show me that the low income housing requirements for that unit to be constructed weren't enforced.
She was remarkably calm when her man just got shot right in front of her.
I get the impression that he was a just younger guy that came by to get some tail from time to time. The woman appears to be quite a few years older than the perp. She's also a real peach. "Get this bitch out of my house." Your tax dollars at work. Appears to also be a new public housing unit.
This is the building. I'm not surprised you assumed it was public housing.
Office of Tax and Revenue Customer Service Center Suite W270 1101 4th Street, SW Washington, DC 20024
And that building also includes DC city government offices, making the likelihood that many if not all of the residential units in that building are subsidized housing. Do you have a point? What makes you think there aren't subsidized housing units in that complex? It's mixed used building containing City of DC government offices.
Lol. The address of the apartment building is 1150 4th St SW. You're even squirellier than usual trying to backtrack on this one.
Okay, now show me that the low income housing requirements for that unit to constructed weren't enforced.
Well I'm glad we established that it's not public housing. Very big of you to admit that. But separately, why are you now so certain that that unit is a low-income housing unit?
She was remarkably calm when her man just got shot right in front of her.
I get the impression that he was a just younger guy that came by to get some tail from time to time. The woman appears to be quite a few years older than the perp. She's also a real peach. "Get this bitch out of my house." Your tax dollars at work. Appears to also be a new public housing unit.
This is the building. I'm not surprised you assumed it was public housing.
Office of Tax and Revenue Customer Service Center Suite W270 1101 4th Street, SW Washington, DC 20024
And that building also includes DC city government offices, making the likelihood that many if not all of the residential units in that building are subsidized housing. Do you have a point? What makes you think there aren't subsidized housing units in that complex? It's mixed used building containing City of DC government offices.
Lol. The address of the apartment building is 1150 4th St SW. You're even squirellier than usual trying to backtrack on this one.
You are ankle biting as usual. The issue is whether this "hero" who was just shot was on the dole. I'd like to know. I'd also like to see the toxicology report. I'm big on facts and honest conversations.
She was remarkably calm when her man just got shot right in front of her.
I get the impression that he was a just younger guy that came by to get some tail from time to time. The woman appears to be quite a few years older than the perp. She's also a real peach. "Get this bitch out of my house." Your tax dollars at work. Appears to also be a new public housing unit.
This is the building. I'm not surprised you assumed it was public housing.
Office of Tax and Revenue Customer Service Center Suite W270 1101 4th Street, SW Washington, DC 20024
And that building also includes DC city government offices, making the likelihood that many if not all of the residential units in that building are subsidized housing. Do you have a point? What makes you think there aren't subsidized housing units in that complex? It's mixed used building containing City of DC government offices.
Lol. The address of the apartment building is 1150 4th St SW. You're even squirellier than usual trying to backtrack on this one.
Okay, now show me that the low income housing requirements for that unit to constructed weren't enforced.
Well I'm glad we established that it's not public housing. Very big of you to admit that. But separately, why are you now so certain that that unit is a low-income housing unit?
And what do you know. They rent to people using Section 8.
Future move to the apartment I just viewed this wonderful apartment building and the terrace apartment that I am happy that they allowed me a section -8 person to view it. This place is my dream apartment. With Kind, friendly and fantastic staff. I'm a disable senior who has viewed this great secure and safe place.!! But, waiting for approval from section-8 move in.
She was remarkably calm when her man just got shot right in front of her.
I get the impression that he was a just younger guy that came by to get some tail from time to time. The woman appears to be quite a few years older than the perp. She's also a real peach. "Get this bitch out of my house." Your tax dollars at work. Appears to also be a new public housing unit.
This is the building. I'm not surprised you assumed it was public housing.
Office of Tax and Revenue Customer Service Center Suite W270 1101 4th Street, SW Washington, DC 20024
And that building also includes DC city government offices, making the likelihood that many if not all of the residential units in that building are subsidized housing. Do you have a point? What makes you think there aren't subsidized housing units in that complex? It's mixed used building containing City of DC government offices.
Lol. The address of the apartment building is 1150 4th St SW. You're even squirellier than usual trying to backtrack on this one.
Okay, now show me that the low income housing requirements for that unit to constructed weren't enforced.
Well I'm glad we established that it's not public housing. Very big of you to admit that. But separately, why are you now so certain that that unit is a low-income housing unit?
And what do you know. They rent to people using Section 8.
Future move to the apartment I just viewed this wonderful apartment building and the terrace apartment that I am happy that they allowed me a section -8 person to view it. This place is my dream apartment. With Kind, friendly and fantastic staff. I'm a disable senior who has viewed this great secure and safe place.!! But, waiting for approval from section-8 move in.
Right. But section 8 is a small proportion of any luxury building's units. So tell me again why you're so certain this one was section 8?
Love the research you're doing though, keep working those Google reviews.
She was remarkably calm when her man just got shot right in front of her.
I get the impression that he was a just younger guy that came by to get some tail from time to time. The woman appears to be quite a few years older than the perp. She's also a real peach. "Get this bitch out of my house." Your tax dollars at work. Appears to also be a new public housing unit.
This is the building. I'm not surprised you assumed it was public housing.
Office of Tax and Revenue Customer Service Center Suite W270 1101 4th Street, SW Washington, DC 20024
And that building also includes DC city government offices, making the likelihood that many if not all of the residential units in that building are subsidized housing. Do you have a point? What makes you think there aren't subsidized housing units in that complex? It's mixed used building containing City of DC government offices.
Lol. The address of the apartment building is 1150 4th St SW. You're even squirellier than usual trying to backtrack on this one.
Okay, now show me that the low income housing requirements for that unit to constructed weren't enforced.
Well I'm glad we established that it's not public housing. Very big of you to admit that. But separately, why are you now so certain that that unit is a low-income housing unit?
If the government is paying and or subsidizing the rent and telling you, that you have to take people using Section 8 vouchers what the fuck is the difference?
She was remarkably calm when her man just got shot right in front of her.
I get the impression that he was a just younger guy that came by to get some tail from time to time. The woman appears to be quite a few years older than the perp. She's also a real peach. "Get this bitch out of my house." Your tax dollars at work. Appears to also be a new public housing unit.
This is the building. I'm not surprised you assumed it was public housing.
Office of Tax and Revenue Customer Service Center Suite W270 1101 4th Street, SW Washington, DC 20024
And that building also includes DC city government offices, making the likelihood that many if not all of the residential units in that building are subsidized housing. Do you have a point? What makes you think there aren't subsidized housing units in that complex? It's mixed used building containing City of DC government offices.
Lol. The address of the apartment building is 1150 4th St SW. You're even squirellier than usual trying to backtrack on this one.
You are ankle biting as usual. The issue is whether this "hero" who was just shot was on the dole. I'd like to know. I'd also like to see the toxicology report. I'm big on facts and honest conversations.
Judging by the video, Parker is an idiot who deserved to get shot. I couldn't care less whether or not this one guy was on the dole. It also wasn't his apartment.
I thought we were talking about another black life cut short by systemic racism among police who gunned him down like a dog without reason or cause. They just were out to shoot a black guy.
She was remarkably calm when her man just got shot right in front of her.
I get the impression that he was a just younger guy that came by to get some tail from time to time. The woman appears to be quite a few years older than the perp. She's also a real peach. "Get this bitch out of my house." Your tax dollars at work. Appears to also be a new public housing unit.
This is the building. I'm not surprised you assumed it was public housing.
Office of Tax and Revenue Customer Service Center Suite W270 1101 4th Street, SW Washington, DC 20024
And that building also includes DC city government offices, making the likelihood that many if not all of the residential units in that building are subsidized housing. Do you have a point? What makes you think there aren't subsidized housing units in that complex? It's mixed used building containing City of DC government offices.
Lol. The address of the apartment building is 1150 4th St SW. You're even squirellier than usual trying to backtrack on this one.
Okay, now show me that the low income housing requirements for that unit to constructed weren't enforced.
Well I'm glad we established that it's not public housing. Very big of you to admit that. But separately, why are you now so certain that that unit is a low-income housing unit?
If the government is paying and or subsidizing the rent and telling you, that you have to take people using Section 8 vouchers what the fuck is the difference?
What's the difference between the projects and low income subsidized units in a luxury building? A fucking lot. I'm also still waiting to hear why you're so certain this one unit was section 8.
But separately, why are you now so certain that that unit is a low-income housing unit?
Because if the DC city government is anything like the city governments in SF and Oakland and Berkeley they aren't allowing any residential high rise/multi-unit apartments to be built without a certain number of units set aside as low income housing. And the fact that I found that particular Apartment complex does take people using Section 8 vouchers.
So tell me how the government forcing you to rent to people using Section 8 vouchers isn't like public housing?
But separately, why are you now so certain that that unit is a low-income housing unit?
Because if the DC city government is anything like the city governments in SF and Oakland and Berkeley they aren't allowing any residential high rise/multi-unit apartments to be built without a certain number of units set aside as low income housing. And the fact that I found that particular Apartment complex does take people using Section 8 vouchers.
So tell me how the government forcing you to rent to people using Section 8 vouchers isn't like public housing?
You do understand that section 8 units are always a small percentage of a luxury building's total units, right? I've marked you down as not answering the question.
Strawman, ass, Kunt, dodging, something like that. Did I do it right?
But separately, why are you now so certain that that unit is a low-income housing unit?
Because if the DC city government is anything like the city governments in SF and Oakland and Berkeley they aren't allowing any residential high rise/multi-unit apartments to be built without a certain number of units set aside as low income housing. And the fact that I found that particular Apartment complex does take people using Section 8 vouchers.
So tell me how the government forcing you to rent to people using Section 8 vouchers isn't like public housing?
You do understand that section 8 units are always a small percentage of a luxury building's total units, right? I've marked you down as not answering the question.
Strawman, ass, Kunt, dodging, something like that. Did I do it right?
But separately, why are you now so certain that that unit is a low-income housing unit?
Because if the DC city government is anything like the city governments in SF and Oakland and Berkeley they aren't allowing any residential high rise/multi-unit apartments to be built without a certain number of units set aside as low income housing. And the fact that I found that particular Apartment complex does take people using Section 8 vouchers.
So tell me how the government forcing you to rent to people using Section 8 vouchers isn't like public housing?
You do understand that section 8 units are always a small percentage of a luxury building's total units, right? I've marked you down as not answering the question.
Strawman, ass, Kunt, dodging, something like that. Did I do it right?
Why should anyone be force to take section 8?
You're about several wrong turns away from being in the right conversation.
But separately, why are you now so certain that that unit is a low-income housing unit?
Because if the DC city government is anything like the city governments in SF and Oakland and Berkeley they aren't allowing any residential high rise/multi-unit apartments to be built without a certain number of units set aside as low income housing. And the fact that I found that particular Apartment complex does take people using Section 8 vouchers.
So tell me how the government forcing you to rent to people using Section 8 vouchers isn't like public housing?
You do understand that section 8 units are always a small percentage of a luxury building's total units, right? I've marked you down as not answering the question.
Strawman, ass, Kunt, dodging, something like that. Did I do it right?
No, I don't understand that at all that's why I've said:
Because if the DC city government is anything like the city governments in SF and Oakland and Berkeley they aren't allowing any residential high rise/multi-unit apartments to be built without a certain number of units set aside as low income housing.
And let me help you out Kunt, this is what not answering a question looks like:
So tell me how the government forcing you to rent to people using Section 8 vouchers isn't like public housing?
She was remarkably calm when her man just got shot right in front of her.
I get the impression that he was a just younger guy that came by to get some tail from time to time. The woman appears to be quite a few years older than the perp. She's also a real peach. "Get this bitch out of my house." Your tax dollars at work. Appears to also be a new public housing unit.
This is the building. I'm not surprised you assumed it was public housing.
Office of Tax and Revenue Customer Service Center Suite W270 1101 4th Street, SW Washington, DC 20024
And that building also includes DC city government offices, making the likelihood that many if not all of the residential units in that building are subsidized housing. Do you have a point? What makes you think there aren't subsidized housing units in that complex? It's mixed used building containing City of DC government offices.
Lol. The address of the apartment building is 1150 4th St SW. You're even squirellier than usual trying to backtrack on this one.
Okay, now show me that the low income housing requirements for that unit to constructed weren't enforced.
Well I'm glad we established that it's not public housing. Very big of you to admit that. But separately, why are you now so certain that that unit is a low-income housing unit?
If the government is paying and or subsidizing the rent and telling you, that you have to take people using Section 8 vouchers what the fuck is the difference?
What's the difference between the projects and low income subsidized units in a luxury building? A fucking lot. I'm also still waiting to hear why you're so certain this one unit was section 8.
Speaking of strawman ass fucks. I never said anything about the "projects."
But separately, why are you now so certain that that unit is a low-income housing unit?
Because if the DC city government is anything like the city governments in SF and Oakland and Berkeley they aren't allowing any residential high rise/multi-unit apartments to be built without a certain number of units set aside as low income housing. And the fact that I found that particular Apartment complex does take people using Section 8 vouchers.
So tell me how the government forcing you to rent to people using Section 8 vouchers isn't like public housing?
You do understand that section 8 units are always a small percentage of a luxury building's total units, right? I've marked you down as not answering the question.
Strawman, ass, Kunt, dodging, something like that. Did I do it right?
Why should anyone be force to take section 8?
You're about several wrong turns away from being in the right conversation.
Question is right on topic and one that you're dodging like a Kunt.
But separately, why are you now so certain that that unit is a low-income housing unit?
Because if the DC city government is anything like the city governments in SF and Oakland and Berkeley they aren't allowing any residential high rise/multi-unit apartments to be built without a certain number of units set aside as low income housing. And the fact that I found that particular Apartment complex does take people using Section 8 vouchers.
So tell me how the government forcing you to rent to people using Section 8 vouchers isn't like public housing?
You do understand that section 8 units are always a small percentage of a luxury building's total units, right? I've marked you down as not answering the question.
Strawman, ass, Kunt, dodging, something like that. Did I do it right?
Why should anyone be force to take section 8?
GRG thinks that the government should be able to force you to take Section 8 vouchers and dictate to you what you are allowed to rent your units out for but he doesn't consider that to be "public" housing.
But separately, why are you now so certain that that unit is a low-income housing unit?
Because if the DC city government is anything like the city governments in SF and Oakland and Berkeley they aren't allowing any residential high rise/multi-unit apartments to be built without a certain number of units set aside as low income housing. And the fact that I found that particular Apartment complex does take people using Section 8 vouchers.
So tell me how the government forcing you to rent to people using Section 8 vouchers isn't like public housing?
You do understand that section 8 units are always a small percentage of a luxury building's total units, right? I've marked you down as not answering the question.
Strawman, ass, Kunt, dodging, something like that. Did I do it right?
Why should anyone be force to take section 8?
You're about several wrong turns away from being in the right conversation.
I make right turns. You didn't answer the question why would anyone be forced to include low income housing in a private project? Answer up stop dodging and deflecting.
But separately, why are you now so certain that that unit is a low-income housing unit?
Because if the DC city government is anything like the city governments in SF and Oakland and Berkeley they aren't allowing any residential high rise/multi-unit apartments to be built without a certain number of units set aside as low income housing. And the fact that I found that particular Apartment complex does take people using Section 8 vouchers.
So tell me how the government forcing you to rent to people using Section 8 vouchers isn't like public housing?
You do understand that section 8 units are always a small percentage of a luxury building's total units, right? I've marked you down as not answering the question.
Strawman, ass, Kunt, dodging, something like that. Did I do it right?
Why should anyone be force to take section 8?
You're about several wrong turns away from being in the right conversation.
I make right turns. You didn't answer the question why would anyone be forced to include low income housing in a private project? Answer up stop dodging and deflecting.
Yeah, while accusing me of dodging questions I answered he for some reason lost his voice when answering the questions he was asked.
Comments
Future move to the apartment
I just viewed this wonderful apartment building and the terrace apartment that I am happy that they allowed me a section -8 person to view it. This place is my dream apartment. With Kind, friendly and fantastic staff. I'm a disable senior who has viewed this great secure and safe place.!! But, waiting for approval from section-8 move in.
Love the research you're doing though, keep working those Google reviews.
But separately, why are you now so certain that that unit is a low-income housing unit?
Because if the DC city government is anything like the city governments in SF and Oakland and Berkeley they aren't allowing any residential high rise/multi-unit apartments to be built without a certain number of units set aside as low income housing. And the fact that I found that particular Apartment complex does take people using Section 8 vouchers.
So tell me how the government forcing you to rent to people using Section 8 vouchers isn't like public housing?
Strawman, ass, Kunt, dodging, something like that. Did I do it right?
Because if the DC city government is anything like the city governments in SF and Oakland and Berkeley they aren't allowing any residential high rise/multi-unit apartments to be built without a certain number of units set aside as low income housing.
And let me help you out Kunt, this is what not answering a question looks like:
So tell me how the government forcing you to rent to people using Section 8 vouchers isn't like public housing?