Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
I'm on the Spurs Bandwagon
I think Spurs or Thunder are winning the title this year. My early money is on the Spurs, provided Tony Parker is healthy. The same team as last year, with a healthier Ginobli, a huge upgrade from Neal to Belinelli, and Patty Mills is one of the most improved players in the league. I'm not just riding Mills because of tonight either, he can ball. The best bench in the league is even better this year and they have the best coach.
Tough to count out the Heat, but I don't see it happening this year. With Lebron, you always have a chance, but the rest of the team is looking dicey. A 3 peat isn't likely.
0 ·
Comments
In the NBA historically the best player on the court wins the titles. So if it isn't Miami it's going to be OKC. I know APAG will bring up 2011 Dallas but they are the exception not the rule and actually in that finals series they did have the best player on the court due to Lebron disappearing.
The Heat is all about Wade's health which is a big mystery. However, with the east being such a fucking dreckfest Spoelstra can manage Wade/Lebron's minutes the rest of the season as they are basically a lock for at worst the #2 seed.
With the East being a dreckfest you can rest Wade the first two rounds of the playoffs. I'm sure Wade will play but he'll sit like a game four when up 3-0 and won't break 35 minutes in any of those contests. So he'll be well rested for the grueling series against the Pacers which will be a war.
While in the West the Spurs if the season ended today would face Phoenix, then Houston-Dallas winner then OKC which is a grind by the time they make it to the finals.
Indiana also comes across as being more hungry than any other team in the NBA, sorta like the seahawks were.
I like the spurs but I don't think they get by OKC, I could also see them losing to a team like POR (even though that's highly unlikely)
this conversation just proves how shit the NBA is. The entire season revolves around 4 teams, cause 4 teams when the season starts have a legit chance at the title. The rest are have nots.
I'm still saying Mavericks. I am stupid.
With that said, I've got OKC over MIA in 6.
I know APAG will bring up 2011 Dallas but they are the exception not the rule and actually in that finals series they did have the best player on the court due to Lebron disappearing.
My "money" is still on Indiana, sure they have looked a little dicey lately but I think when the playoffs come their defense is going to be the decider which puts them past the Heat in a close series and winning the title.
The west is looking like all Thunder. I could see the Spurs, Clippers, or Rockets if they stay hot beating them similar to how the Grizzlies did last year, but I don't expect that to actually happen.
So I am sticking with Pacers-Thunder and the Pacers in 6.
OKC and Indiana are the two best teams but both don't have the look of a title team. Indiana is weak at guard and Westbrook for OKC, I'm not sure is a championship point guard. It will be interesting or interesting.
I am not as confident as I was with the Seahawks winning it all as the season progressed, but I am 81% confident that the team who will win it all will be the Pacers, Heat, or Thunder.
With the Seahawks, 22 very good starters > 1 great starter and 21 dudes. The NBA doesn't necessarily work that way.
I hope the Pacers win it. As RiG said, 'twill be interesting.
Roy Hibbert is a really underrated Center, one of the better ones in the league.
Paul George is definitely the focal point but I do feel they have a few more complete pieces that could put them over the top.
The reason I like the Spurs over the Pacers (if it gets there) is the abundance of weapons. Every player on the Spurs is a threat to score and they are the best 3 point shooting team in the league.
Its the Heat v the Pacers and everyone else is playing for first loser
CollegeDoog, RIP, would agree and he is a long time NBA expert