Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Last year the Quooks made it well known that the kids were playing hard and the coach was amazing.
This year the Quooks are making it well known that the kids are playing hard and the coach is amazing.
Sweet 16 = Hard play, coaching greatness. CBI = Hard play, coaching greatness.
So, the kids aren't the problem and the coach isn't the problem. Did Oregon just have this one coming? I don't get it. Quooks assured me once we got rid of the blick guy and hired an Anglo-Saxon consistency would be achieved. CBI, NIT, Sweet 16, CBI sounds a lot like what the blick guy was doing at half the cost without needed a space ship to play out of.
How can a team that is playing hard with an amazing coach be 4-8 in conference? Anyone?
1 ·
Comments
In regards to Oregon, I'm not sure how smart it is to rely almost solely on transfers. Sometimes, they work out well, but often, there is a reason these guys are transferring. It seems like Altman has completely dropped the ball with recruiting other than getting transfers. Who is your best home grown player? Maybe Dotson? You are right. There is no difference between him and Kent, and his resume really was not very impressive to begin with.
enlighten us Mr. Naismith.
Oregon, Bro.
Oregon.
That's it. Enjoy what you got - it's much more than you deserve.
You don't see a bunch of Vermont or New Hampshire fans coming over hear bitching about their franchise's inability to play up to the salary cap and attorney's fees.
Sincerely.
Go fuck off and die in a fucking fire you worthless cunt.
Who told you, you could work with Men?
What a vulva.
LEAVE!
It's really great of you to rush to his defense, though. What are you, the hall monitor? Ban me if you like - you're dialed in.
I enjoy your pathetic Quook ass.
some "zingers"