Noem Not Making Friends ...

RaceBannon

Garland was nominated

hardhat

TheKobeStopper said:

Kinda like denying a twice elected president from nominating a Justice for no reason at all? Or calling judges “activist judges” any time they don’t agree with you? Are these examples of what she’s talking about?

Kinda like false equivalency

SFGbob

RaceBannon said:

Garland was nominated

I hear the twice elected President was denied from nominating him.

Bob_C

SFGbob said:

RaceBannon said:

Garland was nominated

I hear the twice elected President was denied from nominating him.

Sounds bad.

WestlinnDuck

MelloDawg said:

Tequilla said:

The responses from liberals is beyond amusing ...

https://twitter.com/govkristinoem/status/1381647840452165635?s=21

I agree this SCOTUS “reform” can be perceived as changing the rules when a party doesn’t get its way. It’s sort of like these election laws that are being passed in various parts of the country.

Badabing.

There is this written document that all elected officials swear to respect. It is called the Constitution. It provides for the mechanisms to govern the Republic. One of those is that if you want to change the written language you do so through a Constitutional amendment process that provides for a new and different written document. That is called due process. For a centrist you sure love fascism.

SFGbob

Bob_C said:

SFGbob said:

RaceBannon said:

Garland was nominated

I hear the twice elected President was denied from nominating him.

Sounds bad.

I'm sure Kobe blames systemic white racism for it.

hardhat

SFGbob said:

Bob_C said:

SFGbob said:

RaceBannon said:

Garland was nominated

I hear the twice elected President was denied from nominating him.

Sounds bad.

I'm sure Kobe blames systemic white racism for it.