I agree this SCOTUS “reform” can be perceived as changing the rules when a party doesn’t get its way. It’s sort of like these election laws that are being passed in various parts of the country.
I agree this SCOTUS “reform” can be perceived as changing the rules when a party doesn’t get its way. It’s sort of like these election laws that are being passed in various parts of the country.
Badabing.
I'm more than willing to go back to the election laws that existed prior Covid, you in?
Kinda like denying a twice elected president from nominating a Justice for no reason at all? Or calling judges “activist judges” any time they don’t agree with you? Are these examples of what she’s talking about?
Kinda like denying a twice elected president from nominating a Justice for no reason at all? Or calling judges “activist judges” any time they don’t agree with you? Are these examples of what she’s talking about?
Who who was denied nominating a Justice my little racist friend?
Kinda like denying a twice elected president from nominating a Justice for no reason at all? Or calling judges “activist judges” any time they don’t agree with you? Are these examples of what she’s talking about?
I agree this SCOTUS “reform” can be perceived as changing the rules when a party doesn’t get its way. It’s sort of like these election laws that are being passed in various parts of the country.
Badabing.
There is this written document that all elected officials swear to respect. It is called the Constitution. It provides for the mechanisms to govern the Republic. One of those is that if you want to change the written language you do so through a Constitutional amendment process that provides for a new and different written document. That is called due process. For a centrist you sure love fascism.
Comments
Badabing.
Starting from scratch, what would you consider to be priorities?