Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Another mass shooting by whitey
Comments
-
Christ, you are one dumb motherfucker.TheKobeStopper said:
Atta boy. I don’t really understand how you justify thinking IQ and race can be tied to genetics but violence can’t, but baby steps.SFGbob said:
I don't think race and genetics have anything to do with people being more or less violent Kobe.TheKobeStopper said:
Bump.TheKobeStopper said:
I mean if we’re just going to ask questions back and forth, do you think different races can be more or less violent based their genetics?SFGbob said:
Since you appear to know the answer why don't you tell us?TheKobeStopper said:I wouldn’t want to answer that question if I was you guys either.
Do you think skin color has something to do with a person's ability to avoid having kids out of wedlock?
There is no biological basis for race, there is no genetic basis for race, there is no scientific basis for race. So, if you’re asking if one race is intrinsically more likely to have kids out of wedlock, the answer is obviously no.
Nature vs. nurture. This is Life 101 shit.
Fuck.
-
And the fact that there has been no white defensive backs in the NFL for 20 years and that nearly all elite sprinters are black is due to systemic racism. Got it.TheKobeStopper said:
Atta boy. I don’t really understand how you justify thinking IQ and race can be tied to genetics but violence can’t, but baby steps.SFGbob said:
I don't think race and genetics have anything to do with people being more or less violent Kobe.TheKobeStopper said:
Bump.TheKobeStopper said:
I mean if we’re just going to ask questions back and forth, do you think different races can be more or less violent based their genetics?SFGbob said:
Since you appear to know the answer why don't you tell us?TheKobeStopper said:I wouldn’t want to answer that question if I was you guys either.
Do you think skin color has something to do with a person's ability to avoid having kids out of wedlock?
There is no biological basis for race, there is no genetic basis for race, there is no scientific basis for race. So, if you’re asking if one race is intrinsically more likely to have kids out of wedlock, the answer is obviously no.
-
Everything in TKS's world is Socially Constructed.
Or not. -
He had a white soulDJDuck said:
Aminadab Gaxiola Gonzalez
-
He has a friend who is white.greenblood said:
He had a white soulDJDuck said:
Aminadab Gaxiola Gonzalez
-
Hispanics as we know are passionate and killings of wives, girlfriends, husbands, lovers are not that uncommon when when relationships go wrong. Happens with everyone just a higher rate with the white Hispanics.greenblood said:
He had a white soulDJDuck said:
Aminadab Gaxiola Gonzalez -
Some ancestor of his 500 years ago was mistreated.PurpleThrobber said:
He has a friend who is white.greenblood said:
He had a white soulDJDuck said:
Aminadab Gaxiola Gonzalez -
Systemic racism is complete garbage, a myth propped up by woketards. I can now see why bob brings up strawman buggery.TheKobeStopper said:
Systemic racism. Now answer my question.SFGbob said:
Wasn't the Kunt just crying about other people dodging his questions?TheKobeStopper said:
I mean if we’re just going to ask questions back and forth, do you think different races can be more or less violent based their genetics?SFGbob said:
Since you appear to know the answer why don't you tell us?TheKobeStopper said:I wouldn’t want to answer that question if I was you guys either.
-
When you can't present facts or evidence, you indict the whole "system."
Much easier than owning your shit. -
This is a monumentally stupid thread. Folks like Glenn Loury have clearly laid out the chronology of this issue in a way that should be nearly unanimously agreed up. Yet we always get these shit back and forths instead.
It should be easy to recognize that minorities, black people in particular, have been dealt a shit hand through centuries of state-sanctioned racism. While those de jure practices have more or less been effectively eliminated since the 70s, their legacy isn't hard to trace to the present day. Glenn is perfectly happy to first clearly recognize that history of racism and the inequities it created, but also recognize that the state itself can do little to rectify that problem from this point forward. The gap that remains can only substantially be bridged by the black community itself, with little aid from the state. A patronizing "nanny-state", while well intentioned, has often caused more harm than good (public housing devolving into ghettos, perverse incentives from affirmative action, etc). The number of people who can simultaneously hold these two thoughts in their head at the same time is embarrassingly small.
