Biden considering executive action on gun control
Comments
-
Better to have had the Senate too.RaceBannon said:
Good thing he has two judges on SCOTUS thenGrundleStiltzkin said:
Trump appointee that wrote the opinion. At least that’s what I read on Twitter. Truthy enough.RaceBannon said:
I'd require proof on the 9th. Its a favorite liberal trick to say that although believable because the GOP always gets tricked -
Should have listened to meGrundleStiltzkin said:
Better to have had the Senate too.RaceBannon said:
Good thing he has two judges on SCOTUS thenGrundleStiltzkin said:
Trump appointee that wrote the opinion. At least that’s what I read on Twitter. Truthy enough.RaceBannon said:
I'd require proof on the 9th. Its a favorite liberal trick to say that although believable because the GOP always gets tricked
Joe gets to pack the court now
-
My only fear, as we have discussed, is that the court decides not to hear the case, then whatever dumb shit thing the lower court says is settled law.YellowSnow said:
As we've discussed many a time, eventually the issue of the legality of owning "scary looking" auto-loading rifles is going to have to be decided on by The SCOTUS. What better time to get it on in court once and for all when Team 2A has 5 or 6 slam dunk votes?Swaye said:On the one hand I abhor the idea of this dolt changing Constitutional Rights (can you make an EO that attacks my civil rights? - is that even legal?) by pen stroke. On the other hand perhaps this does signal Manchin isn't going to play along, which is a good thing.
In either case, fuck off Joe.
Why not get it over with now? -
Only in the 9th circuit but I agree.Swaye said:
My only fear, as we have discussed, is that the court decides not to hear the case, then whatever dumb shit thing the lower court says is settled law.YellowSnow said:
As we've discussed many a time, eventually the issue of the legality of owning "scary looking" auto-loading rifles is going to have to be decided on by The SCOTUS. What better time to get it on in court once and for all when Team 2A has 5 or 6 slam dunk votes?Swaye said:On the one hand I abhor the idea of this dolt changing Constitutional Rights (can you make an EO that attacks my civil rights? - is that even legal?) by pen stroke. On the other hand perhaps this does signal Manchin isn't going to play along, which is a good thing.
In either case, fuck off Joe.
Why not get it over with now? -
"national emergency" like Trump did
-
The right deserves to lose everything for being "pro-life"Swaye said:
My only fear, as we have discussed, is that the court decides not to hear the case, then whatever dumb shit thing the lower court says is settled law.YellowSnow said:
As we've discussed many a time, eventually the issue of the legality of owning "scary looking" auto-loading rifles is going to have to be decided on by The SCOTUS. What better time to get it on in court once and for all when Team 2A has 5 or 6 slam dunk votes?Swaye said:On the one hand I abhor the idea of this dolt changing Constitutional Rights (can you make an EO that attacks my civil rights? - is that even legal?) by pen stroke. On the other hand perhaps this does signal Manchin isn't going to play along, which is a good thing.
In either case, fuck off Joe.
Why not get it over with now?
The only thing dumber than that is open borders. -
Roberts pussied out in fear of being overrun with regards to election fraud.Swaye said:
My only fear, as we have discussed, is that the court decides not to hear the case, then whatever dumb shit thing the lower court says is settled law.YellowSnow said:
As we've discussed many a time, eventually the issue of the legality of owning "scary looking" auto-loading rifles is going to have to be decided on by The SCOTUS. What better time to get it on in court once and for all when Team 2A has 5 or 6 slam dunk votes?Swaye said:On the one hand I abhor the idea of this dolt changing Constitutional Rights (can you make an EO that attacks my civil rights? - is that even legal?) by pen stroke. On the other hand perhaps this does signal Manchin isn't going to play along, which is a good thing.
In either case, fuck off Joe.
Why not get it over with now?
Dude better have a bunker built if they allow lower court adverse rulings on 2A matters to stand.
Had dinner last night was a cat who is plugged fucking into the DC/money/conservative crowd - he laughed hysterically when conversation turned to gun control and confiscation of guns.
Dana Carvey/George Bush voice: Nah gun happen.
