Roster numbers - March 2021
Comments
-
You betting on Huard or Martin along with Radley?TTJ said:But only two incomers will contribute in ‘21.
Or O'Brien? -
Polk will play. Losing Jones, Nacua, and Chin from last season was about 57% of our WR snaps on passing downs.dnc said: -
-
I would guess Radley, Moore, Martin, and Polk. O'Brien may get some snaps but don't see him starting.
This makes a good point about the portal really opening up at a helpful time during the coaching transition:
https://si.com/college/washington/football/jmmy-lake-shushes-his-critics-with-big-splash-in-the-transfer-portal -
I was kidding about O'Brien.HFNY said:I would guess Radley, Moore, Martin, and Polk. O'Brien may get some snaps but don't see him starting.
This makes a good point about the portal really opening up at a helpful time during the coaching transition:
https://si.com/college/washington/football/jmmy-lake-shushes-his-critics-with-big-splash-in-the-transfer-portal
The point was about former blue chip recruits exiting versus incoming. Polk doesn't count. I dont think Moore does either iirc. From the list TTJ was going off of, he had to be referring to Huard or Martin. Nobody else on that list is playing this year. -
If Spiker and/or Osborne leave, then Tinae will play. He could easily be the 5th best WR midway through the season.chuck said:
I was kidding about O'Brien.HFNY said:I would guess Radley, Moore, Martin, and Polk. O'Brien may get some snaps but don't see him starting.
This makes a good point about the portal really opening up at a helpful time during the coaching transition:
https://si.com/college/washington/football/jmmy-lake-shushes-his-critics-with-big-splash-in-the-transfer-portal
The point was about former blue chip recruits exiting versus incoming. Polk doesn't count. I dont think Moore does either iirc. From the list TTJ was going off of, he had to be referring to Huard or Martin. Nobody else on that list is playing this year. -
That's true. It may not matter if Spiker and Osborn leave or stay. Neither seems to be on a path to playing. It wouldn't be a surprise if another true freshman beat both out.whatshouldicareabout said:
If Spiker and/or Osborne leave, then Tinae will play. He could easily be the 5th best WR midway through the season.chuck said:
I was kidding about O'Brien.HFNY said:I would guess Radley, Moore, Martin, and Polk. O'Brien may get some snaps but don't see him starting.
This makes a good point about the portal really opening up at a helpful time during the coaching transition:
https://si.com/college/washington/football/jmmy-lake-shushes-his-critics-with-big-splash-in-the-transfer-portal
The point was about former blue chip recruits exiting versus incoming. Polk doesn't count. I dont think Moore does either iirc. From the list TTJ was going off of, he had to be referring to Huard or Martin. Nobody else on that list is playing this year. -
Conventional wisdom has Spiker and Osborne transferring because @jamesosborne1959 has been all over Dawgman saying that they are both going to transfer after spring ball. If I am remembering what he said correctly, Spiker to Boise and Osborne to SJSU.HFNY said:I still haven't fully figured out why the conventional wisdom has both Spiker and Osborne transferring. It would seem that both will be in the two deeps if Bynum, Rome, and McMillan are the starting 3 and backed up by Spiker, Osborne, and Polk. Taj Davis and Sawyer are lurking too though it's hard to imagine both beating out Spiker and Osborne for 2nd string.
Maybe I missed some scuttlebutt? -
Why would they wait until after spring ball to transfer? Why not transfer now to have more tim to earn a spot on the new team?
