XidenBros crushed again
Comments
-
"The media" isn't a monolith. The WSJ broke the story.Tequilla said:You mean the media didn’t do their due diligence and then corrected the story after all relevant implications to the story being wrong no longer matter and can be swept under the rug?
I’d be more surprised at this point if the media had standards
The WaPo corrected two quotations that weren't accurate, yet in were no way substantively different than what Daddy did say. -
"The WaPo corrected two quotations that weren't accurate..." The dazzler and the MSM in a nutshell. Just like Dan Rather.
-
A newspaper corrected an error in its reporting. Gasbag says "That just proves . . . something . . . blah, blah blah . . . ."WestlinnDuck said:"The WaPo corrected two quotations that weren't accurate..." The dazzler and the MSM in a nutshell. Just like Dan Rather.
-
Kinda similar logic to Pelosi talking about fighting a certified election result where her candidate lost by 6 votes ...HHusky said:
"The media" isn't a monolith. The WSJ broke the story.Tequilla said:You mean the media didn’t do their due diligence and then corrected the story after all relevant implications to the story being wrong no longer matter and can be swept under the rug?
I’d be more surprised at this point if the media had standards
The WaPo corrected two quotations that weren't accurate, yet in were no way substantively different than what Daddy did say.
It’s all semantics right? -
An error? I see a pattern. You see an excuse. I pity your clients.HHusky said:
A newspaper corrected an error in its reporting. Gasbag says "That just proves . . . something . . . blah, blah blah . . . ."WestlinnDuck said:"The WaPo corrected two quotations that weren't accurate..." The dazzler and the MSM in a nutshell. Just like Dan Rather.
-
So far you've identified Dan Rather (2001?) and WaPo (2021).WestlinnDuck said:
An error? I see a pattern. You see an excuse. I pity your clients.HHusky said:
A newspaper corrected an error in its reporting. Gasbag says "That just proves . . . something . . . blah, blah blah . . . ."WestlinnDuck said:"The WaPo corrected two quotations that weren't accurate..." The dazzler and the MSM in a nutshell. Just like Dan Rather.
"Pattern!"
The geometry students among us will note two points does establish a line. Calling it a "pattern" is a stretch.
And far from "retracting" the story, as the hack from OAN says, the WaPo corrected the story. It's not really comparable to Rathergate, but you lost your ability to do nuance at the Second Battle of the Marne, I believe.
-
Democrats used the Fake quote as evidence in the last in Peach mint exercise
I’m sure it wasn’t sworn testimony because that would be against the law -
This has legs!
-
Sorry, was referencing the old WoodshedPurpleThrobber said:
Highly unlikely. But two years on HCH.RoadTrip said:
2 years? I've read this fraud's shitpoasts for more than a decade. When was he ever not lying?PurpleThrobber said:
The Dazzler is fine with lying insofar as it accomplishes the objective.HHusky said:oh no
But we've seen 2 years of his lying so that's already been established. -
Somebody play Schiff reading the Ukrainian "transcript" that was completely made up fan fiction.
It did what it was supposed to do and there were no consequences.
With zero accountability the system is broken. People are too busy playing PS5 and dancing on Tiktok to care.
It's a great time to be a politician.
https://youtu.be/ftJc2I4_CL4
