Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

I'd like to teach the world to sing in perfect harmony ...

WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,638 Standard Supporter
Well, apparently big law firms in spite of their illegal affirmative action programs are discriminating against black attorneys on an institutional basis. Geezus what a bunch of sanctimonious democrat piece of sh*t. Any way, woke Coke is on the case with some even more violations of the 14th Amendment and the Civil Rights Act. I see one more white polar bear Coke commercial where one of the bear spouses and bear kids aren't black bears I'm gonna go nuts.

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2021/03/coke-demands-that-its-law-firms-engage-in-unlawful-discrimination.php

COKE DEMANDS THAT ITS LAW FIRMS ENGAGE IN UNLAWFUL DISCRIMINATION
In January 2021, the general counsel of Coca Cola sent a letter to the law firms that represent it. The letter demanded, among other things, that these firms “commit that at least 30% of each of billed associate and partner time will be from diverse attorneys, and of such amounts at least half will be from Black attorneys.”

To enforce this demand, Coke’s general counsel warned that failure to comply on a given new legal engagement over two quarterly reviews “will result in a non-refundable 30% reduction in the fees payable for such New Matter going forward until the commitment is met and, continued failure may result in your firm no longer being considered for. . .work.” Meeting Coke’s diversity requirements will also “be a significant factor in determining. . .inclusion and ongoing status on [Coke’s soon-to-be -released] panel” of “preferred firms.”

Except in very limited circumstances, it is illegal for an employer to make hiring, staffing, and assignment decisions based on race. It is also illegal for a company to require its contractors to do so. If a company demanded that law firms staff its matters with only White attorneys, no one would deny the illegality of the mandate.
«13

Comments

  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,737 Standard Supporter
    Looks like it's time to gear up a pubic hair found in a Coke can lawsuit. Because clearly their legal department doesn't know shit.

    Ka Ching!

  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,638 Standard Supporter
    I think it's pretty obvious that big heavily democratic law firms are doing their best to represent Coke. But now, they will do less than their best or just paper over the problem with hiring black attorneys to do make work and then bill it to Coke. Coke gets worse representation at a higher cost. Maximization of shareholder value? Quaint idea.
  • AtomicPissAtomicPiss Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 64,419 Founders Club

    Well, apparently big law firms in spite of their illegal affirmative action programs are discriminating against black attorneys on an institutional basis. Geezus what a bunch of sanctimonious democrat piece of sh*t. Any way, woke Coke is on the case with some even more violations of the 14th Amendment and the Civil Rights Act. I see one more white polar bear Coke commercial where one of the bear spouses and bear kids aren't black bears I'm gonna go nuts.

    https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2021/03/coke-demands-that-its-law-firms-engage-in-unlawful-discrimination.php

    COKE DEMANDS THAT ITS LAW FIRMS ENGAGE IN UNLAWFUL DISCRIMINATION
    In January 2021, the general counsel of Coca Cola sent a letter to the law firms that represent it. The letter demanded, among other things, that these firms “commit that at least 30% of each of billed associate and partner time will be from diverse attorneys, and of such amounts at least half will be from Black attorneys.”

    To enforce this demand, Coke’s general counsel warned that failure to comply on a given new legal engagement over two quarterly reviews “will result in a non-refundable 30% reduction in the fees payable for such New Matter going forward until the commitment is met and, continued failure may result in your firm no longer being considered for. . .work.” Meeting Coke’s diversity requirements will also “be a significant factor in determining. . .inclusion and ongoing status on [Coke’s soon-to-be -released] panel” of “preferred firms.”

    Except in very limited circumstances, it is illegal for an employer to make hiring, staffing, and assignment decisions based on race. It is also illegal for a company to require its contractors to do so. If a company demanded that law firms staff its matters with only White attorneys, no one would deny the illegality of the mandate.


    Unless you have activist judges, or judges who have been compromised. Therein lies the rub.
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,638 Standard Supporter
    Amazing how a leftard judge can't read. And oh, the promises.

    The legislative history of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, especially its famous section 703(j), is clear: it was intended to prohibit reverse discrimination and quotas. The Senate floor leader for the Civil Rights Act, Hubert Humphrey, declared that Title VII “would prohibit preferential treatment for any particular group,” adding famously that if this proved not the case, he would eat the pages of the statute book where the Act appeared.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,985 Standard Supporter
    Bye-Bye, Coke. Nice knowin' ya.

    My Cuba Libres taste fine with RC.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,985 Standard Supporter
    I do love the ballsiness of that initiative, though:

    "Alright you motherfuckers, get some blacks in your office now (so we don't have to hire them here at corporate), and paper over our racism in the upper ranks of the company with meaningless busy work. What the fuck do we pay you for if not to make us look virtuous and caring while we rot away the teeth in everyone's mouth! Now get on it, fucking asshole lawyers!"
  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,505
    Coke just wants their attorneys to be less white. Weren’t they at the online meeting?
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,985 Standard Supporter
    From this day forward, only fags drink Coke, wear Nike and cleanse with Dove.
  • dfleadflea Member Posts: 7,242

    Bye-Bye, Coke. Nice knowin' ya.

    My Cuba Libres taste fine with RC.

    Cancel culture.

  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,631

    Bye-Bye, Coke. Nice knowin' ya.

    My Cuba Libres taste fine with RC.

    I'll be the final adjudication of that. For now, I won't allow it.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,985 Standard Supporter
    dflea said:

    Bye-Bye, Coke. Nice knowin' ya.

    My Cuba Libres taste fine with RC.

    Cancel culture.

    Choice. Market capitalism. Learn the difference. Economis Major.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,985 Standard Supporter

    Bye-Bye, Coke. Nice knowin' ya.

    My Cuba Libres taste fine with RC.

    I'll be the final adjudication of that. For now, I won't allow it.
    You've clearly internalized your Coke oppression after decades of the Coke boot on your neck.

    RC is Freedom, baby.
  • dfleadflea Member Posts: 7,242

    dflea said:

    Bye-Bye, Coke. Nice knowin' ya.

    My Cuba Libres taste fine with RC.

    Cancel culture.

    Choice. Market capitalism. Learn the difference. Economis Major.
    Yeah, it's different when you do it, Foster boi.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,985 Standard Supporter
    dflea said:

    dflea said:

    Bye-Bye, Coke. Nice knowin' ya.

    My Cuba Libres taste fine with RC.

    Cancel culture.

    Choice. Market capitalism. Learn the difference. Economis Major.
    Yeah, it's different when you do it, Foster boi.
    Foster boi? Nice that one of us made the cut.

    Coke can go on selling woka-cola to whatever faggots want it.

    If you don't understand the difference between cancel-culture and spending my dollars elsewhere, I can't help you.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,914
    dflea said:

    Bye-Bye, Coke. Nice knowin' ya.

    My Cuba Libres taste fine with RC.

    Cancel culture.

    Love people who are either stupid enough or dishonest enough to confuse trying to get someone fired because you don't like their politics with choosing where and with who you decide to spend your money.
  • dfleadflea Member Posts: 7,242
    edited March 2021
    So cancel culture isn't about Dr. Suess?

    See, I don't fag out and stop buying Goya beans because their CEO loves Trump or stop buying Coke because of whatever shit they're up to, either.

    You social justice warriors can take care of it.

    You dopes do what they do and claim it's different. Goya bean boycotters said they were spending their dollars elsewhere - just like you guys.

    Totally different when you do it, though.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,914
    dflea said:

    So cancel culture isn't about Dr. Suess?

    See, I don't fag out and stop buying Goya beans because their CEO loves Trump or stop buying Coke because of whatever shit they're up to, either.

    You social justice warriors can take care of it.

    You dopes do what they do and claim it's different. Goya bean boycotters said they were spending their dollars elsewhere - just like you guys.

    Totally different when you do it, though.

    So stupid it is. Leftist are denying people the ability to purchase certain Dr. Suess books. Biden refused to even say his name. Say Coke all you like faggot. Buy all the Coke you like faggot.
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,638 Standard Supporter
    dflea said:

    So cancel culture isn't about Dr. Suess?

    See, I don't fag out and stop buying Goya beans because their CEO loves Trump or stop buying Coke because of whatever shit they're up to, either.

    You social justice warriors can take care of it.

    You dopes do what they do and claim it's different. Goya bean boycotters said they were spending their dollars elsewhere - just like you guys.

    Totally different when you do it, though.

    It's just not a voting issue for little flea. But it does remain a big issue for him. He never wanted Rush cancelled by attacking his advertisers. That was just a fringe group of about every leftard. Same simps want Fox cancelled.
  • dfleadflea Member Posts: 7,242

    dflea said:

    So cancel culture isn't about Dr. Suess?

    See, I don't fag out and stop buying Goya beans because their CEO loves Trump or stop buying Coke because of whatever shit they're up to, either.

    You social justice warriors can take care of it.

    You dopes do what they do and claim it's different. Goya bean boycotters said they were spending their dollars elsewhere - just like you guys.

    Totally different when you do it, though.

    It's just not a voting issue for little flea. But it does remain a big issue for him. He never wanted Rush cancelled by attacking his advertisers. That was just a fringe group of about every leftard. Same simps want Fox cancelled.
    Yeah, I've never done any of that shit, but go on with your lie anyhow.

    You hate the left's social justice warriors. But the social justice warrioring the right does is different.
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,638 Standard Supporter
    dflea said:

    dflea said:

    So cancel culture isn't about Dr. Suess?

    See, I don't fag out and stop buying Goya beans because their CEO loves Trump or stop buying Coke because of whatever shit they're up to, either.

    You social justice warriors can take care of it.

    You dopes do what they do and claim it's different. Goya bean boycotters said they were spending their dollars elsewhere - just like you guys.

    Totally different when you do it, though.

    It's just not a voting issue for little flea. But it does remain a big issue for him. He never wanted Rush cancelled by attacking his advertisers. That was just a fringe group of about every leftard. Same simps want Fox cancelled.
    Yeah, I've never done any of that shit, but go on with your lie anyhow.

    You hate the left's social justice warriors. But the social justice warrioring the right does is different.
    No habla gibberish. I could give a phuck about you flea, but you and yours care very deeply about me.
Sign In or Register to comment.