Ted Cruz bought plane tickets on Feb 16th to fly IAH-CUN on Feb 17th, returning Feb 21st. For himself, his wife and his two daughters. All booked on the same flights on the same days. He obviously changed that return flight for himself to come back on the 18th.
Teq is right on this. If I were US Senator, I wouldn't act that way, but I don't fucking care since I'm not a voter in Texas.
It’s obviously a terrible look for Cruz and he way too often makes these gaffes
That said ... if this was the actions of Ted Cruz, father located in Houston, of taking his family to Cancun because he has the ability to, would anybody really give a shot if he wasn’t a Senator?
This is a huge part of the “do as I say not as I do” political class on both sides of the aisle
California is now unable to perform even basic functions of civilization, like having reliable electricity.
Biden/Harris/AOC want to make CA’s failed energy policy the standard nationwide.
-Ted Cruz
California has to shut down their power when the wind blows. Texas power was cut after an unprecedented winter weather event. Other that you fucking nailed it Dazzler.
I'm sure it seems unprecedented . . . if you're under 10.
Otherwise, it's cold weather. Texas has had that before.
Yes, nearly 90 years ago they had weather this cold. You fucking nailed it again Dazzler.
Your on an island here, blob. Even the Guv isn’t excusing the failure to winterize.
I’m on an island? You’re the Kunt who is claiming this kind of weather is common for Texas and now lying about it and claiming you didn’t say that.
Is your house bulletproof Dazzler?
Adjusting your lie now.
I didn’t say “all the time”. I didn’t say “common” either.
Don’t trip while you backpedal, blob.
And this Kunt accuses me of literalism. I said this was an unprecedented winter weather event. It hasn’t been this cold in Texas for this long in nearly 90 years.
You said:
I'm sure it seems unprecedented . . . if you're under 10.
Otherwise, it's cold weather. Texas has had that before.
So unless you believe I’m 100 years old you are claiming this is something that happens all the time in Texas.
What’s it like being a lying Kunt Dazzler?
Is your house bullet proof Dazzler? Answer the question Kunt.
They had a freeze about a decade ago, blob. The recommendation was to winterize. They didn’t.
It’s either cold enough to freeze or it isn’t. It hasn’t been 90 years since it was freezing in Texas. Nice try.
They've not had weather this cold for nearly 90 years. And since you're now performing you literalist Kunt act, show me where I said Texas hasn't had freezing weather for 90 years you fucking hypocritical worthless Kunt.
blob's going to fight to the death over picayune explorations of frozenness. Frozen in 2011-> "Hey, you guys should winterize." They didn't do it.
California is now unable to perform even basic functions of civilization, like having reliable electricity.
Biden/Harris/AOC want to make CA’s failed energy policy the standard nationwide.
-Ted Cruz
California has to shut down their power when the wind blows. Texas power was cut after an unprecedented winter weather event. Other that you fucking nailed it Dazzler.
I'm sure it seems unprecedented . . . if you're under 10.
Otherwise, it's cold weather. Texas has had that before.
Yes, nearly 90 years ago they had weather this cold. You fucking nailed it again Dazzler.
Your on an island here, blob. Even the Guv isn’t excusing the failure to winterize.
I’m on an island? You’re the Kunt who is claiming this kind of weather is common for Texas and now lying about it and claiming you didn’t say that.
Is your house bulletproof Dazzler?
Adjusting your lie now.
I didn’t say “all the time”. I didn’t say “common” either.
Don’t trip while you backpedal, blob.
And this Kunt accuses me of literalism. I said this was an unprecedented winter weather event. It hasn’t been this cold in Texas for this long in nearly 90 years.
You said:
I'm sure it seems unprecedented . . . if you're under 10.
Otherwise, it's cold weather. Texas has had that before.
So unless you believe I’m 100 years old you are claiming this is something that happens all the time in Texas.
What’s it like being a lying Kunt Dazzler?
Is your house bullet proof Dazzler? Answer the question Kunt.
They had a freeze about a decade ago, blob. The recommendation was to winterize. They didn’t.
It’s either cold enough to freeze or it isn’t. It hasn’t been 90 years since it was freezing in Texas. Nice try.
They've not had weather this cold for nearly 90 years. And since you're now performing you literalist Kunt act, show me where I said Texas hasn't had freezing weather for 90 years you fucking hypocritical worthless Kunt.
blob's going to fight to the death over picayune explorations of frozenness. Frozen in 2011-> "Hey, you guys should winterize." They didn't do it.
Not unprecedented. You lied.
Dazzler is going to dance like a Kunt. It's unprecedented in the lives of nearly everyone who is alive today. Now where did I say that it never freezes in Texas you lying Kunt?
This isn’t any different than what the Dakota’s, and the rest of the Midwest deal with on an annual basis. But your bleeding heart is duly noted. It’s also cute that you think this is a lot of money. I’m sure a PAC or two distributed most of those funds to sucker knobs like you into thinking you’re part of a movement. Your gullibility is pretty pathetic.
This isn’t any different than what the Dakota’s, and the rest of the Midwest deal with on an annual basis. But your bleeding heart is duly noted. It’s also cute that you think this is a lot of money. I’m sure a PAC or two distributed most of those funds to sucker knobs like you into thinking you’re part of a movement. Your gullibility is pretty pathetic.
No water, heat or power is routine in the Midwest?
This isn’t any different than what the Dakota’s, and the rest of the Midwest deal with on an annual basis. But your bleeding heart is duly noted. It’s also cute that you think this is a lot of money. I’m sure a PAC or two distributed most of those funds to sucker knobs like you into thinking you’re part of a movement. Your gullibility is pretty pathetic.
No water, heat or power is routine in the Midwest?
Almost makes Seattle seem less sucky.
Red states are unable to perform even basic functions of civilization.
This isn’t any different than what the Dakota’s, and the rest of the Midwest deal with on an annual basis. But your bleeding heart is duly noted. It’s also cute that you think this is a lot of money. I’m sure a PAC or two distributed most of those funds to sucker knobs like you into thinking you’re part of a movement. Your gullibility is pretty pathetic.
No water, heat or power is routine in the Midwest?
Almost makes Seattle seem less sucky.
It's not routine. Not routine in Texas either. But as we ramp up renewables, it will become a more common occurrence.
This isn’t any different than what the Dakota’s, and the rest of the Midwest deal with on an annual basis. But your bleeding heart is duly noted. It’s also cute that you think this is a lot of money. I’m sure a PAC or two distributed most of those funds to sucker knobs like you into thinking you’re part of a movement. Your gullibility is pretty pathetic.
No water, heat or power is routine in the Midwest?
Almost makes Seattle seem less sucky.
It's not routine. Not routine in Texas either. But as we ramp up renewables, it will become a more common occurrence.
Not if done properly. If we really wanted to implement renewalables correctly and effectively over time, we could. The money and politics will always get in the way though.
This isn’t any different than what the Dakota’s, and the rest of the Midwest deal with on an annual basis. But your bleeding heart is duly noted. It’s also cute that you think this is a lot of money. I’m sure a PAC or two distributed most of those funds to sucker knobs like you into thinking you’re part of a movement. Your gullibility is pretty pathetic.
This isn’t any different than what the Dakota’s, and the rest of the Midwest deal with on an annual basis. But your bleeding heart is duly noted. It’s also cute that you think this is a lot of money. I’m sure a PAC or two distributed most of those funds to sucker knobs like you into thinking you’re part of a movement. Your gullibility is pretty pathetic.
No water, heat or power is routine in the Midwest?
Almost makes Seattle seem less sucky.
It's not routine. Not routine in Texas either. But as we ramp up renewables, it will become a more common occurrence.
Not if done properly. If we really wanted to implement renewalables correctly and effectively over time, we could. The money and politics will always get in the way though.
If you like human prosperity and a clean environment, split baby split.
This isn’t any different than what the Dakota’s, and the rest of the Midwest deal with on an annual basis. But your bleeding heart is duly noted. It’s also cute that you think this is a lot of money. I’m sure a PAC or two distributed most of those funds to sucker knobs like you into thinking you’re part of a movement. Your gullibility is pretty pathetic.
No water, heat or power is routine in the Midwest?
Almost makes Seattle seem less sucky.
It's not routine. Not routine in Texas either. But as we ramp up renewables, it will become a more common occurrence.
Not if done properly. If we really wanted to implement renewalables correctly and effectively over time, we could. The money and politics will always get in the way though.
If you like human prosperity and a clean environment, split baby split.
This isn’t any different than what the Dakota’s, and the rest of the Midwest deal with on an annual basis. But your bleeding heart is duly noted. It’s also cute that you think this is a lot of money. I’m sure a PAC or two distributed most of those funds to sucker knobs like you into thinking you’re part of a movement. Your gullibility is pretty pathetic.
No water, heat or power is routine in the Midwest?
Almost makes Seattle seem less sucky.
It's not routine. Not routine in Texas either. But as we ramp up renewables, it will become a more common occurrence.
Not if done properly. If we really wanted to implement renewalables correctly and effectively over time, we could. The money and politics will always get in the way though.
The problem is that we aren't. So why pretend that renewables are a complete solution which is what is taught in school, what is preached by the green gaia nude green deal religionists. It's just math and science that you need to have sufficient baseload generation or you are going to get blackouts. I would recommend a hundred year solution and if not, then I would explain what happens if you get such an event. In Oregon, tough to get a loan to build unless you are above the hundred year flood level.
This isn’t any different than what the Dakota’s, and the rest of the Midwest deal with on an annual basis. But your bleeding heart is duly noted. It’s also cute that you think this is a lot of money. I’m sure a PAC or two distributed most of those funds to sucker knobs like you into thinking you’re part of a movement. Your gullibility is pretty pathetic.
No water, heat or power is routine in the Midwest?
Almost makes Seattle seem less sucky.
It's not routine. Not routine in Texas either. But as we ramp up renewables, it will become a more common occurrence.
Not if done properly. If we really wanted to implement renewalables correctly and effectively over time, we could. The money and politics will always get in the way though.
If you like human prosperity and a clean environment, split baby split.
This isn’t any different than what the Dakota’s, and the rest of the Midwest deal with on an annual basis. But your bleeding heart is duly noted. It’s also cute that you think this is a lot of money. I’m sure a PAC or two distributed most of those funds to sucker knobs like you into thinking you’re part of a movement. Your gullibility is pretty pathetic.
No water, heat or power is routine in the Midwest?
Almost makes Seattle seem less sucky.
It's not routine. Not routine in Texas either. But as we ramp up renewables, it will become a more common occurrence.
Not if done properly. If we really wanted to implement renewalables correctly and effectively over time, we could. The money and politics will always get in the way though.
If you like human prosperity and a clean environment, split baby split.
i have zero problems with nuclear
He just votes for people who do have a problem with it.
This isn’t any different than what the Dakota’s, and the rest of the Midwest deal with on an annual basis. But your bleeding heart is duly noted. It’s also cute that you think this is a lot of money. I’m sure a PAC or two distributed most of those funds to sucker knobs like you into thinking you’re part of a movement. Your gullibility is pretty pathetic.
No water, heat or power is routine in the Midwest?
Almost makes Seattle seem less sucky.
It's not routine. Not routine in Texas either. But as we ramp up renewables, it will become a more common occurrence.
Not if done properly. If we really wanted to implement renewalables correctly and effectively over time, we could. The money and politics will always get in the way though.
The problem is that we aren't. So why pretend that renewables are a complete solution which is what is taught in school, what is preached by the green gaia nude green deal religionists. It's just math and science that you need to have sufficient baseload generation or you are going to get blackouts. I would recommend a hundred year solution and if not, then I would explain what happens if you get such an event. In Oregon, tough to get a loan to build unless you are above the hundred year flood level.
I agree its way more complicated than many make it out to be. I still think its something to strive for.
This isn’t any different than what the Dakota’s, and the rest of the Midwest deal with on an annual basis. But your bleeding heart is duly noted. It’s also cute that you think this is a lot of money. I’m sure a PAC or two distributed most of those funds to sucker knobs like you into thinking you’re part of a movement. Your gullibility is pretty pathetic.
No water, heat or power is routine in the Midwest?
Almost makes Seattle seem less sucky.
It's not routine. Not routine in Texas either. But as we ramp up renewables, it will become a more common occurrence.
Not if done properly. If we really wanted to implement renewalables correctly and effectively over time, we could. The money and politics will always get in the way though.
If you like human prosperity and a clean environment, split baby split.
This isn’t any different than what the Dakota’s, and the rest of the Midwest deal with on an annual basis. But your bleeding heart is duly noted. It’s also cute that you think this is a lot of money. I’m sure a PAC or two distributed most of those funds to sucker knobs like you into thinking you’re part of a movement. Your gullibility is pretty pathetic.
No water, heat or power is routine in the Midwest?
Almost makes Seattle seem less sucky.
It's not routine. Not routine in Texas either. But as we ramp up renewables, it will become a more common occurrence.
Not if done properly. If we really wanted to implement renewalables correctly and effectively over time, we could. The money and politics will always get in the way though.
If you like human prosperity and a clean environment, split baby split.
i have zero problems with nuclear
He just votes for people who do have a problem with it.
Please tell me what candidates are backing nuclear?
Comments
Ted Cruz bought plane tickets on Feb 16th to fly IAH-CUN on Feb 17th, returning Feb 21st. For himself, his wife and his two daughters. All booked on the same flights on the same days. He obviously changed that return flight for himself to come back on the 18th.
Teq is right on this. If I were US Senator, I wouldn't act that way, but I don't fucking care since I'm not a voter in Texas.
Not unprecedented. You lied.
Almost makes Seattle seem less sucky.
Nice job, dumbasses who believed it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4dxQ9o9TWs
This is pretty well Oct thru March in E. Washington/Northern Idaho.
Haven't seen any offers to pay to put the power lines underground.