McConnell will vote to acquit Trump

AtomicPiss

What an unprincipled corrupt hack

He just knows which way the wind is blowing.

doogie

Fuck McConnell. I want my five bucks back

HHusky

Many if not most acquittal votes will argue that it's unconstitutional--not that they approve of Daddy's actions.

In Mitch's case, of course, he created the fact he relies upon.

RaceBannon

not guilty

doogie

HHusky said:

Many if not most acquittal votes will argue that it's unconstitutional--not that they approve of Daddy's actions.

In Mitch's case, of course, he created the fact he relies upon.

Eat rat poison. All of it

HHusky

doogie said:

HHusky said:

Many if not most acquittal votes will argue that it's unconstitutional--not that they approve of Daddy's actions.

In Mitch's case, of course, he created the fact he relies upon.

Eat rat poison. All of it

It's true what they say.

So far, it's only made me stronger.

NorthwestFresh

HHusky said:

Many if not most acquittal votes will argue that it's unconstitutional--not that they approve of Daddy's actions.

In Mitch's case, of course, he created the fact he relies upon.

The “judge” is a juror who voted previously to convict the defendant. This was an illegitimate show trial. Only morons are defending it.

Such as you.

RaceBannon

HHusky said:

Many if not most acquittal votes will argue that it's unconstitutional--not that they approve of Daddy's actions.

In Mitch's case, of course, he created the fact he relies upon.

Prove it in a court of law was the order of the day here so feel free to shut the fuck up now

You lost

Again

No court has proven any of your conspiracy theories, Q

HHusky

NorthwestFresh said:

HHusky said:

Many if not most acquittal votes will argue that it's unconstitutional--not that they approve of Daddy's actions.

In Mitch's case, of course, he created the fact he relies upon.

The “judge” is a juror who voted previously to convict the defendant. This was an illegitimate show trial. Only morons are defending it.

Such as you.

We already had that vote, Boris.

HHusky

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

Many if not most acquittal votes will argue that it's unconstitutional--not that they approve of Daddy's actions.

In Mitch's case, of course, he created the fact he relies upon.

Prove it in a court of law was the order of the day here so feel free to shut the fuck up now

You lost

Again

No court has proven any of your conspiracy theories, Q

The Senate can vote to acquit or convict on any burden of proof it chooses. #Constitution

Further, where besides the Senate can a federal official be tried for violating his oath of office?

doogie

It isn’t an Impeachment trial.

Judge said so.

HHusky

doogie said:

It isn’t an Impeachment trial.

Judge said so.

he didn't

of course

doogie

Where is he?

HHusky

doogie said:

Where is he?

so he didn't say so

NorthwestFresh

Fuck off, Turtle.

https://twitter.com/jackposobiec/status/1360702724367646720?s=21

Bendintheriver

HH the lawyer throwing out empty lies. I find it funny. Sophomoric, infantile and completely dishonest but it is funny to see a grown man act like a two year old.

HHusky

Bendintheriver said:

HH the lawyer throwing out empty lies. I find it funny. Sophomoric, infantile and completely dishonest but it is funny to see a grown man act like a two year old.

awesome

PurpleThrobber

Bendintheriver said:

HH the lawyer throwing out empty lies. I find it funny. Sophomoric, infantile and completely dishonest but it is funny to see a grown man act like a two year old.

The Dazzler isn't a lawyer.

SFGbob

HHusky said:

Many if not most acquittal votes will argue that it's unconstitutional--not that they approve of Daddy's actions.

In Mitch's case, of course, he created the fact he relies upon.

Who is arguing that they approve of "Daddy's" actions my strawman ass fucking Kunt of a friend?