43-8 speaks loud and clear.
Comments
-
But when did the ducks win it all? Close counts for something, especially for duckfuckerizartion.dnc said:
He's right you know.ApostleofGrief said:the whole seahawks thing.... and this is serious.... I am seeing it happen in droves. Even to family members
DUCKIZATION
The Ducks are just unbearable every time they win it all.
-
ApostleofGrief said:
if a seahawk fan looks like a duck, talks like a duck, .... then what follows....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y7sLYNwevDQ
-
straw man..... talking about fans acting like Ducks, not if or if not they won a natty... don't straw man the Apostle..Tailgater said:
But when did the ducks win it all? Close counts for something, especially for duckfuckerizartion.dnc said:
He's right you know.ApostleofGrief said:the whole seahawks thing.... and this is serious.... I am seeing it happen in droves. Even to family members
DUCKIZATION
The Ducks are just unbearable every time they win it all.
The straw man fallacy occurs in the following pattern of argument:
Person 1 has position X.
Person 2 disregards certain key points of X and instead presents the superficially similar position Y. The position Y is a distorted version of X and can be set up in several ways, including:
Presenting a misrepresentation of the opponent's position.
Quoting an opponent's words out of context—i.e., choosing quotations that misrepresent the opponent's actual intentions (see fallacy of quoting out of context).[4]
Presenting someone who defends a position poorly as the defender, then denying that person's arguments—thus giving the appearance that every upholder of that position (and thus the position itself) has been defeated.[3]
Inventing a fictitious persona with actions or beliefs which are then criticized, implying that the person represents a group of whom the speaker is critical.
Oversimplifying an opponent's argument, then attacking this oversimplified version.
Person 2 attacks position Y, concluding that X is false/incorrect/flawed.
This reasoning is fallacious because attacking a distorted version of a position does not address the actual position. The ostensible argument that Person 2 makes has the form:
"Don't support X, because X has an unacceptable (or absurd or contradictory or terrible) consequence."
However, the actual form of the argument is:
"Don't support X, because Y has an unacceptable (or absurd or contradictory or terrible) consequence."
This argument doesn't make sense; it is a non sequitur. Person 2 relies on the audience not noticing this. -
I don't know why anyone is celebrating the Seahawks winning the Super Bowl. If you are not Paul Allen or his immediate family, why would you celebrate?
-
It was obvious that the dew was playing havoc with Peyton's gloves. Also, being at such low elevation, Peyton couldn't adjust to the greater density of New York's atmosphere.
-
Gotta love duck fans/Portlanders who hate Seattle every waking minute of the year except when they get to jump on an NFL bandwagon after theirs breaks down. The Seahawks embrace the entire NW only becuz they're a business. Just another reason to be a dawg.
-
Anyone needing an audience for a nonsensical argument is strawless.ApostleofGrief said:
This argument doesn't make sense; it is a non sequitur. Person 2 relies on the audience not noticing this.Tailgater said:
But when did the ducks win it all? Close counts for something, especially for duckfuckerizartion.dnc said:
He's right you know.ApostleofGrief said:the whole seahawks thing.... and this is serious.... I am seeing it happen in droves. Even to family members
DUCKIZATION
The Ducks are just unbearable every time they win it all.
-
Difficult for those of us not envious of nor intimidated by the $billionaire's nerdiness....... to avoid celebrating. Football fanaticism is kind of that way, but to each his own game.RoadDawg55 said:I don't know why anyone is celebrating the Seahawks winning the Super Bowl. If you are not Paul Allen or his immediate family, why would you celebrate?
-
Be no means are most Seahawk fans like yuck fans. Here's a note from a Hawk fan here in Savannah that I watched the game with:
I watched the game at a party with about 50 people, all but three were Denver fans. Said nothing when everyone told us the Hawks had no chance. When we got up 15 - 0 I said, "They're in deep trouble." That's all. At 22 - 0 I gave a silent cut throat gesture to the crowd for Sherman. Followed by a one liner, "It's over." Never said another word after that in honor of Lynch.
If you don't know plenty of Hawk fans like this, consider who you hang out with. One in 100,000 bird fans could keep their gloating mouths shut like this. -
You're just another arrogant bird flying high above the trailer trash migratories. Come's with the insufferable Emerald turf tread by Dawgs and Hawks alike.Steve_Bowman said:Be no means are most Seahawk fans like yuck fans. Here's a note from a Hawk fan here in Savannah that I watched the game with:
I watched the game at a party with about 50 people, all but three were Denver fans. Said nothing when everyone told us the Hawks had no chance. When we got up 15 - 0 I said, "They're in deep trouble." That's all. At 22 - 0 I gave a silent cut throat gesture to the crowd for Sherman. Followed by a one liner, "It's over." Never said another word after that in honor of Lynch.
If you don't know plenty of Hawk fans like this, consider who you hang out with. One in 100,000 bird fans could keep their gloating mouths shut like this.
